Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 1]

Madras High Court

M.A.Azeez Khaleeli vs The Tamil Nadu Waqf Board on 6 December, 2022

Author: N. Sathish Kumar

Bench: N. Sathish Kumar

                                                                                  Writ Petition No.9813 of 2017


                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                   Dated: 6/12/2022

                                                      CORAM

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR

                                            Writ Petition No.9813 of 2017
                                                        and
                                             W.M.P.No.10806 of 2017

                     M.A.Azeez Khaleeli                     ...          Petitioner

                                                           Vs

                     1. The Tamil Nadu Waqf Board
                        rep. By its Chairman
                        1 Jaffer Syrang Street
                        Behind Custom House,
                        Vallal Seethakaathi Nagar
                        Chennai 600 001.

                     2. The Chief Executive Officer
                        The Tamil Nadu Waqf Board
                        1 Jaffer Syrang Street
                        Behind Custom House,
                        Vallal Seethakaathi Nagar
                        Chennai 600 001.

                     3. Mirza Atul Kirmani Namazi

                     4. Rehana Yavar Dhala                  ...          Respondents

                     PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
                     praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorari to call for the records of the
                     second respondent in Proceedings No.6345/15/C2/Chennai dated 2/12/2016

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                     Page No:1/4
                                                                                     Writ Petition No.9813 of 2017


                     in so far as it relates to the order suspending the writ petitioner from the
                     office of Muthavalli, order directing the third and fourth respondents to take
                     charge of administration and management of the endowment and the order
                     directing the third and fourth respondents to sign a lease deed with the
                     encroachers.


                                        For Petitioner            ...   Ms.Veena Suresh

                                        For respondents           ...   Mr.V.Lakshminarayan
                                                                        for R.R.1 and 2.

                                                                        No appearance for R.3

                                                                        Mr.C.Seethapathy
                                                                        for R.4
                                                              -----
                                                            ORDER

This writ petition has been filed to quash the order dated 2/12/2016 passed by the second respondent in Proceedings No.6345/15/C2/Chennai,

2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing for the respondents produced a copy of R.C.No.14859/15/B9/Chennai, dated 5/3/2019, wherein it is stated that the son of the third respondent has been appointed as Muthawalli and the entire administration is handed over to the fourth respondent. Relevant portion of the Resolution reads as follows:-

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No:2/4 Writ Petition No.9813 of 2017 “Though Janaba.Rehana Yavar Dhala, Muthawalli of the waqf denies the said allegation orally, there are consistent complaints as against her and she has not been performing any of the ceremony of the said waqf. We are not at present go into any of the allegations made against her. However, the statement of account submitted by her to the Board for 2017 – 2018 shows that Religious expenses shown by her as nil and as such it indicates the religious ceremonies have not been performed. In these circumstances, though the office of Muthawallis are appointed by the existing Mthawalli as per title deed, the Board in exercise of power of superintendence under Section 32 read with Section 64 of the Waqf Act, 1995 can issue orders appointing Muthawalli or Joint Muthawalli for the effective and efficient administration of the wakf to give effect to the object of the waqf.
In view of the said factual and legal position, in the larger interest of the wakf, the Board deem it fit to appoint Janab.Adnan Kirman as one of the three Muthawallis of the waqf by cooption. All the three Muthawallis shall give effect to the object of waqf in letter and spirit.” N. SATHISH KUMAR, J mvs.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No:3/4 Writ Petition No.9813 of 2017

3. In view of the above, nothing survives for further adjudication in this matter. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

6/12/2022 Index : Yes / No Internet: Yes Speaking/non speaking order mvs.

W.P.No.9813 of 2017

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No:4/4