Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gauhati High Court

M/S S D Construction vs The Union Of India And 4 Ors on 17 July, 2023

Author: Kalyan Rai Surana

Bench: Kalyan Rai Surana

                                                                Page No.# 1/3

GAHC010152322023




                      THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                            Case No. : WP(C)/3971/2023

         M/S S D CONSTRUCTION
         HAVING THEIR OFFICE AT BORA SERVE BYE LANE, ULUBARI, GUWAHATI,
         ASSAM-781007 DULY REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR, SRI DEBOPRIYO DEBROY
         AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS.
         S/O LATE SANKAR DEBROY,
         R/O STAR ENCLAVE, G.N.B. ROAD, PANBAZAR, GUWAHATI-781001, ASSAM



         VERSUS

         THE UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS
         REP. BY THE SECRETARY,
         MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, NEW DELHI-110001.

         2:ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF
          MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES
          DIRECTORATE OF CONTRACT MANAGEMENT
          KASHMIR HOUSE
          RAJAJI MARG

         NEW DELHI-110011

         3:THE CHIEF ENGINEER (AF)

          SHILLONG ZONE

         MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES (MES)
         ELEPHANTA FALLS CAMP
         NONGIYER
         SHILLONG- 793009
         MEGHALAYA.

         4:THE COMMANDER WORKS ENGINEER
                                                                         Page No.# 2/3


             (AIR FORCE) MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES
             JORHAT
             ASSAM
             PIN-785005.

            5:THE GARRISON ENGINEER (AF)

             MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES
             JORHAT
             ASSAM
             PIN-78500

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MRS. R BORAH

Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I.




                                   BEFORE
                   HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA

                                          ORDER

Date : --17.07.2023.

Heard Mr. D. Bora, learned counsel for the petitioner. As pointed out that before cancellation of a contract, the respondents authorities are required to give to the petitioner an appropriate and sufficient notice as envisaged under clause 21.8.1.(A)(ii) of the MES Manual of Contracts 2020. It is asserted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that as per his instructions no notice before cancelation was served upon the petitioner. Accordingly, it is submitted that notwithstanding the petitioner had invoked arbitration clause, owing to non-compliance of the provision referred herein before, it is submitted that the writ petition would be maintainable. Mr. K.K. Parasar, learned CGC appearing for the respondent has raised issue of maintainability of this writ petition owing to existence of arbitration clause, contained in the agreement read with General Conditions of Contract.

Page No.# 3/3 Be that as it may, as the issuance of notice before cancellation of contract is raised, the Court is inclined to grant time to the learned CGC to obtain instructions and to produce documents to show that notice before cancellation of contract as indicated herein above was issued to the petitioner. List the matter on 21.07.2023 in the motion column.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant