Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

P.Chidambaram vs Latha on 27 August, 2020

Author: G.R.Swaminathan

Bench: G.R.Swaminathan

                                                      1

                    BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                              DATED: 27.08.2020

                                                   CORAM

                      THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

                                        Cont.P.(MD)No.643 of 2020
                                       in W.P.(MD)No.16623 of 2016

            P.Chidambaram                                                 ... Petitioner

                                                     Vs.
            Latha
            District Revenue Officer,
            Sivagangai District.                                           ... Respondent

            Prayer : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of
            Court Act, to initiate contempt proceedings against the respondent and
            punish the respondent for willfully disobeying the order passed in W.P.
            (MD)No.16623 of 2016, dated 18.10.2019.


                             For Petitioner         : Mr.K.P.S.Palanivel Rajan

                             For Respondent         : Mr.S.Angappan,
                                                     Government Advocate.

                                                  ORDER

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the contemnor.

2.The petitioner alleges that the order passed by this Court on 18.10.2019 in W.P.(MD)No.16623 of 2016 has been breached. The petitioner's counsel states that by passing an order dated 04.06.2020, contempt http://www.judis.nic.in has been committed.

2

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

gns

3.I went through the contents of the order dated 04.06.2020. I come to know that the respondent has only restored the position that obtained prior to the order that was quashed by this Court. The respondent has not committed any contempt. The petitioner has to necessarily workout his remedy in the pending civil proceedings.

4.The contempt petition stands closed, accordingly.

27.08.2020 Index :yes/No Internet:yes/No gns Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

Cont.P.(MD)No.643 of 2020

http://www.judis.nic.in