Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Chavda vs State on 26 April, 2007

Author: H.K.Rathod

Bench: H.K.Rathod

  
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	

 
 


	 

SCA/11107/2007	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 11107 of 2007
 

With


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 11108 of 2007
 

To


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 11115 of 2007
 
 
=========================================================

 

CHAVDA
GANPATSINH BABAJI & 8 - Petitioner(s)
 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT THRO'THE SECRETARY & 2 - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================

 

 
Appearance
: 
MR
YATIN OZA, SR. ADVOCATE WITH MS SRUSHTI A THULA for
Petitioners 
MR SUNIT SHAH, GP WITH MR HEMANT MAKWANA AGP for
Respondent : 1, 
None for Respondent(s) : 2 -
3. 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 26/04/2007 

 

 
 
ORAL
ORDER 

1. Heard the learned Senior Advocate, Mr.Yatin Oza with learned advocate, Ms.S.A.Thula, appearing on behalf of petitioners and learned Government Pleader, Mr.Sunit Shah, with learned AGP, Mr.Hemant Makwana, appearing on behalf of respondent No.1.

2. Learned Senior Advocate, Mr.Oza, submitted that minimum 350 marks for written test, 100 marks for physical test and 50 marks for oral interview were prescribed in the advertisement. The petitioners cleared the written as well as physical test but, not received the minimum marks in oral interview and, therefore, they are not selected. He also submitted that minimum passing marks for oral interview are not obtained by the petitioners, which negates the result of the petitioners, meaning thereby that it having impact on other two examinations where the petitioners have succeeded. Therefore, question is that whether any minimum marks for oral interview has been declared by the respondents in advance or whether minimum marks for oral interview have been fixed by the selection board or not and what is the procedure adopted by the respondents while selecting the candidates from the post of head constable to PSI.

3. Notice, returnable on 8.5.2007. Direct service is permitted.

(H.K.RATHOD,J.) (vipul)