Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Krishan Yadav Since Deceased, Thr. ... vs Shiv Charan And Ors on 18 September, 2017

Author: Rameshwar Singh Malik

Bench: Rameshwar Singh Malik

110
        IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                       CHANDIGARH


                                                  CM No.9731-C of 2017 in/and
                                                  RA-RS No.64-C of 2017 in
                                                  RSA No.2591 of 2016
                                                  Date of decision: 18.09.2017

Krishan Yadav (deceased) through LRs
                                                                     ... Appellant


                                            Vs.


Shiv Charan and others
                                                                  ... Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK

Present:     Mr. Anil Goel, Advocate
             for the applicant-appellant.

                   ******

RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK, J. (ORAL)

CM-9731-C-2017 Applicant seeks recalling of the order dated 04.07.2017, whereby review application of the applicant was dismissed for non-prosecution.

After hearing learned counsel for the applicant, instant application is allowed, for the reasons stated therein. Order dated 04.07.2017, dismissing the review application for non-prosecution, is hereby recalled. Consequently, review application No.64-C of 2017 in RSA No.2591 of 2016 would stand restored to its original number.

CM stands disposed of.

RA-RS-64-C-2017 After hearing learned counsel for the review applicant, no error apparent on the record has been either pointed out or found in the order dated 1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 20-09-2017 01:26:20 ::: CM No.9731-C of 2017 in/and -2- RA-RS No.64-C of 2017 in RSA No.2591 of 2016 30.03.2017. In fact, learned counsel for the review applicant-appellant wants to re-argue the case under the garb of this review application, which is not permissible in law. No ground for interference in the review application has been made out and the same is hereby dismissed.





                                   [ RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK ]
18.09.2017                                  JUDGE
vishnu


Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether reportable        Yes/No




                                   2 of 2
                ::: Downloaded on - 20-09-2017 01:26:21 :::