Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Ajay Singh vs Khacheru . on 27 January, 2020

Author: S. Ravindra Bhat

Bench: S. Ravindra Bhat

      ITEM NO.19                              COURT NO.4                           SECTION XI

                                  S U P R E M E C O U R T O F                  I N D I A
                                          RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

      Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos. 34407-34408/2013

      AJAY SINGH                                                                    Petitioner(s)
                                                       VERSUS
      KHACHERU & ORS.                                                               Respondent(s)

      Date : 27-01-2020 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

      CORAM :             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
                                            [IN CHAMBER]

      For Petitioner(s)                Dr.   Surat Singh, Adv.
                                       Mr.   Lalit Singh N., Adv.
                                       Mr.   Ashutosh Mishra, Adv.
                                       Mr.   Sudhansu Palo, AOR

      For Respondent(s)                Mr. Anil Kumar Pandey, Adv.
                                       Ms. Manjula Chaurasia, Adv.
                                       Mr. K. L. Janjani, AOR

                                       Mr. Mohit Kumar Gupta, Adv.
                                       Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, AOR

                           UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                              O R D E R

Learned counsel for the State of Uttar Pradesh is present and accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.3. In these circumstances, service is deemed complete on all the respondents. The matters shall be processed.

It is submitted that Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, learned counsel for respondent No. 5, has now been designated as standing counsel and therefore, cannot represent the private party in these proceedings. The Court sees no conflict since the dispute is a private one between the petitioner and the respondent (except respondent No. 3) who are all private parties.

In view of the representation on behalf of the State, Signature Not Verified service is deemed complete, the Registry is directed to process Digitally signed by SUSHMA KUMARI BAJAJ Date: 2020.02.01 11:22:04 IST Reason: the matter for further listing.

                           (NIDHI AHUJA)                                  (SUMAN JAIN)
                         COURT MASTER (SH)                               BRANCH OFFICER