Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Minor Rashidha Shahul Hameed vs The Deputy Collector (Revenue) on 27 April, 2023

Author: M.Dhandapani

Bench: M.Dhandapani

                                                                               W.P.No.10157 of 2023

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                    DATED : 27.04.2023

                                                           CORAM

                                    THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

                                                W.P.No.10157 of 2023
                                                        And
                                          W.M.P.Nos.10183 and 10185 of 2023

                     Minor Rashidha Shahul Hameed
                     Rep. by her Mother
                     Mrs.Akkila Banu                                      ... Petitioner

                                                             Vs.

                     1.The Deputy Collector (Revenue),
                       Department of Revenue and Disaster Management,
                       Government of Puducherry,
                       Puducherry.

                     2.The Tahsildar
                       Taluk Office,
                       Revenue Department,
                       Government of Puducherry,
                       Puducherry – 605 008.

                     3.The Convenor,
                       Centralised Admission Committee (CENTAC),
                       Government of Puducherry,
                       Pondicherry Engineering College Campus,
                       Puducherry – 605 014.                     ... Respondents


                     Prayer:

                                  Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to

                     issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the


                     1/12

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                              W.P.No.10157 of 2023

                     second          respondent    in   his   proceedings   No.1333/TOP/C/2023

                     Puducherry dated 20.03.2023 and to quash the same as being illegal

                     and unsustainable in law and for a consequential direction to the

                     second respondent to issue nativity and residence certificate to the

                     petitioner namely Rashidha Shahul Hameed based on her application

                     dated 06.02.2023 within a time frame to be fixed by this Hon'ble

                     Court.


                                  For Petitioner  : Ms.N.Kavitha Rameshwar
                                  For Respondents : Mr.J.Kumaran
                                                    Additional Government Pleader(Puducherry)


                                                         ORDER

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the second respondent in his proceedings No.1333/TOP/C/2023 Puducherry dated 20.03.2023 and to quash the same as being illegal and unsustainable in law and for a consequential direction to the second respondent to issue nativity and residence certificate to the petitioner namely Rashidha Shahul Hameed based on her application dated 06.02.2023 within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

2.The case of the petitioner is the petitioner was born on 2/12 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.10157 of 2023 08.04.2006 at Puducherry and her parents also were born on Puducherry and are natives of Puducherry. The petitioner studied upto V Standard in Puducherry. Since, her father was employed at Kuwait, the petitioner was residing in Kuwait from 2016 and did her schooling in Carmel School, affiliated to Central Board of Secondary Education, New Delhi, India. The petitioner applied for registration through Centralised Admission Committee (CENTAC) inorder to appear for NEET UG examination. In order to apply for admission under the notification issued by CENTAC for the academic year 2023 – 2024, the petitioner has to produce nativity certificate. Hence, the petitioner applied for her nativity certificate vide application dated 06.02.2023, however, the second respondent rejected her request. Hence, this writ petition.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the second respondent rejected the petitioner's request for issuance of nativity certificate on the ground that the petitioner is not a resident of Puducherry. She further submitted that the petitioner's grandparents are natives of Puducherry and the petitioner's parents are also natives of Puducherry and they have Aadhar Card and Voter Identity Card to prove that they are natives of Puducherry. She 3/12 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.10157 of 2023 further submitted that the petitioner studied upto V Standard in Puducherry and thereafter also she studied in CBSE syllabus. Hence, the impugned order is not sustainable one.

4.Per contra, the learned Additional Government Pleader (Puducherry) submitted that for issuance of nativity certificate the Government of Puducherry has issued detailed guidelines, which makes clear that while computing the period of actual residence, temporary absence for education, job etc., shall be ignored. In case where the parents have gone abroad for the purpose of employment, then the residence of grandparents in the UT of Pondicherry may also be taken for the issue of residence certificate for study purpose only to their grandchildren in exceptional and genuine cases, where the children reside with grandparents and are studying in recognized educational institutions in the UT of Pondicherry. In the present case, the petitioner resided along with her parents at Kuwait did her schooling in Kuwait and hence, the petitioner is not entitled for nativity certificate.

5.Heard the arguments advanced on either side and perused the materials available on record.

4/12

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.10157 of 2023

6.Perusal of records reveal that the petitioner was born on 08.04.2006 at Puducherry and she studied upto V Standard in Puducherry. Thereafter, since her father was employed at Kuwait, she resided along her parents in Kuwait from 2016 and did her schooling in Carmel School, affiliated to Central Board of Secondary Education, New Delhi, India. Inorder to pursue her higher studies, she applied for nativity certificate, however, the same was rejected on the ground that she did not reside at Puducherry and she resided along with her parents at Kuwait and did her schooling in Kuwait.

7.In this regard, it is relevant to extract hereunder the relevant portion of the guidelines issued in Order No.6260/C2/Rev/2003 dated 06.10.2003 of the Revenue Department, Puducherry:

“(i) While computing the period of actual residence, temporary absence for education, job etc., shall be ignored. In case where the parents have gone abroad for the purpose of employment, then the residence of grandparents in the UT of Pondicherry may also be taken for the issue of residence certificate for study purpose only to their grandchildren in exceptional and genuine cases, where the 5/12 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.10157 of 2023 children reside with grandparents and are studying in recognized educational institutions in the UT of Pondicherry.”
8.In the present case, though the petitioner's father is employed in Kuwait, her grandparents are residing in Puducherry and the petitioner also did her primary schooling in Puducherry. Thereafter, even though she resided along with her parents in Kuwait, she did her schooling in CBSE syllabus.
9.The guidelines cited supra makes it clear that where the parents have gone abroad for the purpose of employment, then the residence of grandparents in the UT of Pondicherry may also be taken for the issue of residence certificate for study purpose only to their grandchildren in exceptional and genuine cases. In the present case, the petitioner resided along with her grandparents and studied upto V Standard in Puducherry. Hence, the impugned order is not sustainable one.
10.Further, this Court has considered similar issue in the decision made in W.P.No.16532 of 2021 dated 25.11.2021 and has 6/12 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.10157 of 2023 held as follows:
“9.The facts in the case is not in dispute. The issue involved is in narrow compass. There is mechanism provided for determination of the residents in the Union Territory of Pondicherry in Circular of the Revenue Department No.6260/C2/Rev/ 2003 dated 06.10.2003 and the relevant portion reads as follows:
“(1)DETERMINATION OF THE “RESIDENTS” IN THE UNION TERRITORY OF PONDICHERRY.
The following shall be the criteria prescribed for determining persons as Residents of this Union Territory:-
(i)The candidate or whose parent(either Mother or Father or Both) or Guardian (in the case of Children who have lost both the parents) has been residing continuously in this Union Territory for atleast five years preceding the date of application.
.................................................................. .................................................................
(2)Further the certificate-issuing authorities are instructed to strictly adhere to the following instructions in deciding the resident status of the applicants, namely:-
7/12
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.10157 of 2023
(i)While computing the period of actual residence, temporary absence for education, job etc., shall be ignored. In cases where the parents have gone abroad for the purpose of employment, then the residence of Grand parents in the U.T. of Pondicherry may also be taken for the issue of Residence Certificate for study purpose only to their Grand Children in exceptional and genuine cases, where the children reside with grand parents and are studying in recognized educational institutions in the U.T. Of Pondicherry.
(ii)The actual and physical residence of the applicant/parent/ Guardian is essential. But, mere possession of evidences like Ration Card, EPIC Card or previous certificate etc. are not the sole criteria for issuance of the Residence Certificate. At the same time, such evidences should not be totally ignored.

After detailed enquiry, if it is found that such evidences are false or obtained on false representation of facts, immediate action has to be taken by the certificate-

8/12

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.10157 of 2023 issuing authorities (Tahsildar/ Dy.Tahsildar) to inform the appropriate authorities to cancel them. It shall also be brought to the knowledge of the concerned Deputy Collector (Revenue)/ Joint Secretary (Revenue) for follow up action.

                                         (3)For     getting      Nativity/Residence
                                  certificate,     the   application    has    to   be
                                  submitted        by    the     applicant    to    the

concerned Tahsildar of Taluk Office or Dy.Tahsildar of Sub-Taluk Office and it will be forwarded to the Village Administrative Officer of the concerned revenue village through the Revenue Inspector for discreet enquiry and report. If the applicant or parent or guardian resides in the concerned revenue village, as per the criteria mentioned in pre-paras, the Village Administrative Officer shall make a report and it shall be verified by the Revenue Inspector. After considering the reports of the VAO and RI, the Dy.Tahsildar or Tahsildar of concerned Sub-Taluk or Taluk may issue the certificate to the applicant.”

10.Admittedly, the petitioner is a permanent resident 9/12 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.10157 of 2023 of Mahe. Her father is working as Headmaster in Government School, Mahe and her mother is also residing at Mahe. The said fact is not disputed by the respondents.

11.This Court perused the Circular of the Revenue Department No.6260/C2/Rev/ 2003 dated 06.10.2003 wherein it is stated that while computing the period of actual residence, temporary absence for education, job etc., shall be ignored. After her marriage on 22.06.2020, the petitioner went to Gundulpet in Mysore, Karnataka and again after her husband went to Netherlands, due to employment, she started living along with her parents in Mahe. Therefore, it is clearly evident that but for the short duration after marriage, the petitioner has all along been a resident of Union Territory of Pondicherry. Such being the undisputed position, rejecting the petitioner's claim for issuance of Residence / Nativity Certificate is not acceptable as it is not in consonance with Circular of the Revenue Department No.6260/C2/Rev/ 2003 dated 06.10.2003, issued by the Pondicherry Government.”

11.In view of the above, the impugned order is set aside and the second respondent is directed to issue nativity certificate within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, so as to enable the petitioner to pursue her higher studies.

10/12

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.10157 of 2023

12.The writ petition is allowed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

27.04.2023 pri Note: Issue order copy on 28.04.2023 Speaking Order/ Non Speaking Order Index: Yes/ No Internet: Yes/ No To

1.The Deputy Collector (Revenue), Department of Revenue and Disaster Management, Government of Puducherry, Puducherry.

2.The Tahsildar Taluk Office, Revenue Department, Government of Puducherry, Puducherry – 605 008.

3.The Convenor, Centralised Admission Committee (CENTAC), Government of Puducherry, Pondicherry Engineering College Campus, Puducherry – 605 014.

11/12

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.10157 of 2023 M.DHANDAPANI,J.

pri W.P.No.10157 of 2023 And W.M.P.Nos.10183 and 10185 of 2023 27.04.2023 12/12 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis