Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

K.Rameshbabu vs The Administrator on 12 September, 2023

Author: N. Sathish Kumar

Bench: N. Sathish Kumar

                                                                 W.P.Nos.26660, 26662 & 26663 of 2023

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED : 12.09.2023

                                                    CORAM :

                            THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR

                                       W.P.Nos.26660, 26662 & 26663 of 2023

                    K.Rameshbabu                                 ... Petitioner
                                                                     in W.P.No.26660 of 2023

                    M.Nagarajan                                  ... Petitioner
                                                                     in W.P.No.26662 of 2023

                    T.Sridharan                                  ... Petitioner
                                                                     in W.P.No.26663 of 2023

                                                       Vs.

                    The Administrator,
                    Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation,
                    Employees' Pension Fund Trust,
                    Thiruvalluvar Illam,
                    Pallavan Salai,
                    Chennai -600 002.                                     ... Respondent
                                                                              in all writ petitions

                    Common Prayer : Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the
                    Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the
                    respondent to disburse the petitioners the difference sum of interest paid
                    towards the belated disbursement of the petitioners' Commuted Value of
                    Pension with further interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of
                    entitlement till the date of actual payment within a time limit to be
                    stipulated by this Court.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis


                    Page 1 of 4
                                                                     W.P.Nos.26660, 26662 & 26663 of 2023




                                  For Petitioner     : Mr.J.Lakshminarayanan
                                                       in all writ petitions

                                  For Respondent     : Mr.C.S.K.Sathish
                                                       in all writ petitions


                                               COMMON ORDER

These writ petitions have been filed to direct the respondent to disburse the petitioners the difference sum of interest paid towards the belated disbursement of the petitioners' Commuted Value of Pension with further interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of entitlement till the date of actual payment within a time limit to be stipulated by this Court.

2.It is the case of the petitioners that they retired from the respondent Corporation, however, their retirement benefits were settled belatedly. Therefore, the petitioners approached this Court earlier seeking interest for the belated payment of their retirement benefits and this Court was pleased to direct the respondent to pay interest @ 4% p.a. for the belated payment of their terminal benefits. However, now, it is the grievance of the petitioners that, insofar as the interest towards Commuted Value of Pension is concerned, the respondent has disbursed only lesser https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 2 of 4 W.P.Nos.26660, 26662 & 26663 of 2023 amount than the one as calculated by the petitioners. Hence, the petitioners seek for the difference in interest amount paid towards belated payment of Commutated Value of Pension to the petitioners. In this regard, the petitioners have also submitted representations to the respondent. Since the same was not considered, the present writ petitions have been filed.

3.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.C.S.K.Sathish, learned counsel, who takes notice for the respondent.

4.Considering the limited nature of the relief sought for in these writ petitions, the respondent is directed to pay the eligible amount, if any, towards difference in interest amount paid towards belated payment of Commutated Value of Pension to the petitioners, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5.With the above direction, these writ petitions are disposed of. No costs.

12.09.2023 mkn https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis N. SATHISH KUMAR, J.


                    Page 3 of 4
                                                              W.P.Nos.26660, 26662 & 26663 of 2023

                                                                                            mkn

                    Internet : Yes
                    Index    : Yes / No
                    Neutral citation : Yes / No
                    Speaking order / Nonspeaking order

                    To

                    The Administrator,

Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Employees' Pension Fund Trust, Thiruvalluvar Illam, Pallavan Salai, Chennai -600 002.

W.P.Nos.26660, 26662 & 26663 of 2023 12.09.2023 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 4 of 4