Karnataka High Court
North West Karnataka Road vs G.C Madhu S/O Channappa on 3 August, 2011
Author: Subhash B.Adi
Bench: Subhash B.Adi
Po & JE RARMATAS A MiG M i. IN THE HiGH COURT THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE SUBHASH B ADI MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.257 OF 2011 INV) BETWEEN: 1. NORTH WEST KARNATAKA ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, GOKUL ROAD, HUBLI, AY TTS: MANAGING « DIRECTOR, REP BY Its CHIEF LAW OFFICER ; cs NORTH ¥. wnat KAR AATAKE RO AD TRANSPORT CORPORATION INTERRAL INSU RANCE FUND GOKUL ROAD, HUBLLBY 8 MABAGING DIRECTOR; REP BY ITS CHIEF 2 LAW OF FICER . APPELLANTS SNUKA, ADV) MALABA PIMGh LOLURT OP RANNATAICA HIGH COURT GF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT iow L. G.C.MADHU 8/0 CHANNAPPA, AGE: 24 YEARS Sage RUE AGE: 33 YEARS DIO CHANRAPPA, A 12 23 YEARS . = ' 4, VELBA ni, 0/0 GCHANNAPPA, ACE: 29 YEARS SAE Sor Se? Sof PE Mo TTR SS BRO ORE RL u a cu se v a i <i =
fe ee ibe ~ is ang sewat baat oe
-
se ea ag hes 2 4 Pe a pea wnat a oa oe
--
hat ots a fos a Tribunal has awarded compersation of %.4,20,8 2 ALL ARE AGRICULTIRIST ALL ARE B/t> CETRRE LALLI VILLAGE, HAR, ALA, HOERLI, CHITRADUERGA TALITE RESPONDENTS -
Thes MPA is fled under sectins:. 1730) oF. Motor Verio cles Act against the judgment-and awart. dated 24.4.2010 passed in MVC No.323/2009 on the file of the Sr. Chal Judge amd CJM and Addi. MACT, Chitradurga avrarding a. compensation of © .4,40, 896; - With interest @ 6% p. a, froin ths date of petition till deposit. ne rr This appeal.c? ooming on fer orders this day, the Court delivers ed the folowing:
lave in Aline the al, however, the somite i Le « considered ori merit. i igh there 4 is ad
2. Tisis appeal ie filed by the KSRTC against the questioning the quarto of compensation, oe a. . 7 2 9 2, On appreciation of the evidence on record, the o "s earning m oe - a & se hist tans on [D1 mm tnese circummst BPE GASH RP RRS Res PRD BIN GPP RGABUSUIA RPL MEGS CEU P QO BURGE ARCA, FUar PE CaaUR'T GF RARMATAIA HIGH COURT GF KARNATAKA HIGH COL, Sas +
4. Leerned counsel for the appellant subm ntted * that the deceased was the father of the « claimants oral , gaimecia are maior SOUENES © GMG Sor amd ae such, 'the Trimunal could not have decd wted Lf St of the income and calculated the sormpensition "towards lnas of deperdency.
(in dispute that amonget the four ws, three "are daughters and all three are unmarried. Even the een ls aged about 23 yeara. From the ame of the claims, it does not show thet they are ag erabers a@nd-in turn, # appeara that they are al depend os on the mcome of the iather. On acoount ol f the S anita is ey death of the lather, there is me one to e of the three wrexd daughters.
the Tevbutie) hee taker calcu ted the compersation. In my 'opinion, the fidgment and award of the Tribunal does not call fer ptescteremce. SS