Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Pushpam Appala Naidu vs State Of Karnataka on 1 September, 2010

Author: Subhash B.Adi

Bench: Subhash B.Adi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

DATED THIS THE 15'1" DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2010

BEFORE

THE HONBLE MRJUSTICE SUBHASH B.AD.IE

CRIMINAL PETITION No.4244/2o:§.d' if   *' 

BETWEEN:

1.

Pushpam Appaia Naidu

W/0 Appala Naidu

Aged about 46 years

Managing Director E»   .   
Quest Net Enterprises India' Ltd.,"  _ E
9th Floor, 'B,   '  'A    

The rain tree Phas«e:T', '

Make Nikoias Road _' » :   '

Chitpet, Chennai--_ES0OO31--.A  ' "

Tamilnadw  A V' -  

 K1,_iIfl._ar A 
{V5/0 TQC.fFf._udrappa' ' _
R/'at.'--Nehn1'Njaga"r~.,¢_ " '~ 

Chif1*adLI;'ga._ ' .. PETITIONERS

 Pran9iiia..V1:\:Iesa:1'gi, Sr.AdV.}

«  of ~Kamataka

By K0te'Po1ice Station

 " Chitradurga

"  Bangalore --- 1.

CID.' 
.. RESPONDENTS

'(fey Sri.Satish R. Girji, HCGP for R1}



This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
praying to quash the proceedins in C.C.No.1'794/O9 on the file
of the Add}. C.J.[Jr.Dn.} & JMFC., Chitradurga in Crime
No.46/O8 of Kote P.S., Chitradurga. 

This petition coming on for admission this ;rt
made the followmgz   V. ' " -1- ' '

Government Pleader is directeds to 3,take*- notioefifor

respondent No. 1.

This is a joint petition filed  the accused No.1 as well

as the compiainant.

2. Petitioner.i$fo.2:=A._has  before the Kote
Police, 3 under Sections
420   that, petitioner No.1 -
accusedvxinduced  No.2 -- complainant to deposit

Rs.3.Q0,000'/ii  of  by assuring handsome income

 V. ,.out:'th._e:said amoutritd through the oniine business. However.

  po_oi1eoti.ng évthettjsaid amount, neither he paid the money nor

got'   out of the same. In turn, the accused with

"intention to cheat the complainant had collected the said

" « .amou'i)_t.

3. Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioners

A' submits that, the matter is settled and both the complainant



and accused No.1 have jointly filed this petition for
compounding. it is submitted that, there is no pubiicinterest

or public policy involved in this matter and in the"-«.si'niilar

circumstances, two other complaints were 

Mandya City Police and High Grounds Police,"  . 

this Court in Criminal Petition 

2025/ 2010 by order dated 13'~h.__.Nove1nberp  

2010 respectively has quashed t4Iie';proceedi11¢.<VgAs}'' 0}

Considering the i"tije.v'petition is allowed.
Insofar as accLised_   proceedings in
C.C.No.   Chitradurga arising
out of. ;'V'1i:.io..'éi6d/000$;«lgfegistered by Kote Police,

Chitradurga,  0 

     - 

iaage