Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 7, Cited by 0]

Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur

Harpal vs State (Home Department)Ors on 3 September, 2013

Author: Ajay Rastogi

Bench: Ajay Rastogi

    

 
 
 

 In The High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan
Jaipur Bench, Jaipur
O R D E R
D.B. Civil Writ Petition (Parole) No.13580/2013
Harpal Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. 

Date : 03.09.2013

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi
Hon'ble Mr.Justice J.K. Ranka

Mr. L.S. Tomar, for petitioner.
Mr. G.S. Fauzdar, Addl. Govt. Adv., for respondent.

The convict-petitioner Harpal S/o Ladu Ram has preferred this parole petition for grant of second regular parole of 30 days under the Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole Rules,1958.

Counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner & his brother Budhram both were convicted & sentenced for offence u/S 148, 447, 149, 302,325, 323 & 324 IPC, vide judgment dt.30.06.2009 in Sessions Case No.58/2004 (57/2004) .

Application of the petitioner for grant of second parole was rejected by the advisory committee as evident from the minutes dt.25.04.2012 (Annx.2). However, it has been informed that Budhram was granted second parole by the coordinate Bench of this Court and as regards present petitioner he availed the benefit of first parole and abide by the conditions in terms of order of this Court and his jail conduct is also found to be satisfactory and this fact has not been controverted by the respondents in their reply to the parole petition.

After considering the submissions made by counsel for the parties and the fact that conduct of convict-petitioner in jail is satisfactory, in the facts & circumstances, we consider it appropriate to grant the convict-petitioner the benefit of second regular parole to which he is entitled for under the Scheme of Rules, 1958.

Consequently, writ petition stands allowed and recommendation of committee in its meeting held on 25.04.2012 (Annx.2) qua petitioner is hereby quashed. The Superintendent, Central Jail, Ajmer is directed to release petitioner (Harpal S/o Ladu Ram) on second parole, if not availed of, for 30 days including days of journey to home & back from the date of his release on furnishing his personal bond besides one surety of Rs.25000/- to the satisfaction of jail authority with the stipulation that he shall surrender himself and return back to the Central Jail, Ajmer on expiry of 30 days (supra) to be notified by jail authority and shall maintain peace & tranquility during second parole period. In case of failure to surrender by petitioner on stipulated date, the jail authority shall proceed in accordance with law.

A copy of this order be sent to the petitioner through jail authority for compliance. No costs.

(J.K. Ranka), J.                                 (Ajay Rastogi),J.




VS Shekhawat/-PA/p.2
13580cw13Sep03FnlDsps(D41).sxw
Certificate - All corrections have been 
incorporated in the judgment/order being 
emailed/Vijay Singh Shekhawat/PAJ