Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Land And Building Department vs N.S. Vasisht on 24 March, 2023

Bench: M.R. Shah, C.T. Ravikumar

                                                               1


     ITEM NO.13                                   COURT NO.4                         SECTION XIV

                                     S U P R E M E C O U R T O F                 I N D I A
                                             RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

                SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s).7292/2023

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19-01-2016
     in WPC No.7731/2015 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi)

     LAND AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT & ANR.                                                 Petitioner(s)

                                                              VERSUS

     N.S. VASISHT & ORS.                                                                 Respondent(s)

     (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.50437/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN
     REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS )

     Date : 24-03-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
                            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.T. RAVIKUMAR


     For Petitioner(s)                     Ms. Sujeeta Srivastava, AOR


     For Respondent(s)


                             UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

                                                        O R D E R

It is the case on behalf of the petitioners that the original writ petitioner was the subsequent purchaser.

It is submitted that however still the High Court has entertained the writ petition at the instance of the subsequent purchaser by observing that the subsequent Signature Not Verified purchaser can create the deemed lapse of acquisition under Digitally signed by Jayant Kumar Arora Date: 2023.03.27 18:24:21 IST Reason: Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and 2 Resettlement Act, 2013 which is just contrary to three decisions of this Court which have been subsequently followed in which the view taken is that the subsequent purchaser has no locus either to challenge acquisition and/or pray for deemed lapse of acquisition. It is further submitted even otherwise the High Court has not property appreciated the fact that the possession could not be taken over due to stay. Reliance is placed on the decision of this court in the case of Indore Development Authority vs. Manoharlal and Others reported in (2020)8 SCC 129.

Issue notice on the application for condonation of delay as well as on the Special Leave Petition, returnable on 01.05.2023.

Dasti, in addition, is permitted.

Concerned respondents be served within 10 days from today.

(DEEPAK JOSHI)                                               (NISHA TRIPATHI)
COURT MASTER (SH)                                          ASSISTANT REGISTRAR