Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Sri Mohan S/O B S Ramalingam vs Smt Janaki Kirshnappa on 17 November, 2011

Author: B.Sreenivase Gowda

Bench: B.Sreenivase Gowda

THE HIG Boswil 1 COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGAL ORE. EMBER | 201 Pas DATED THIS THE L177?" DAY OF NCR 4 BEFORE THE HOWBLE ME. JUSTIC EE AGED ABOUT 57} VE RypA NO. 164, SWARNALINGA VIELAGE,. iN ROAD, WES S.OF CHORD ROAR, MAHALAKSHMIPURAM, BAN SALG REGGE 1086 a (BY SRI KALYAN ee tT KIRS! &.

WIO © ae es 5 iene BAPE AGED ABOUT 42 YE | 'su sworn SLATE EB I ARE Ri A NO.SS, PALACE ROAD, " BANGALORE-560052 , as = EE PE AR BOTH ey . RESPORDENTS #EY @RIS G VENKATACHALAPATHY, ADV. FOR RI . §L-SERVICE HELD SUFFICIENT) RFA FILED UNDER SEC.G6 OF CPC., AGAINST TEE JVUDGRENT AND DECREE DATED: 194.9010 PASSED I8 ie bed C.8.NO.9563/007 ON THE MILE OF THE XLIV ADDL. © avin & SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE, (CCE 45). DECRERING THE SUIT FOR EIECTMENT. me ig progr ey Pisce Ual b iG ON FOR ADMISSION THIS Day, tHE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: |

8) The appeal @ by the dstexdant challenging: he ea judgment and decree passed by the Trial Court in O.8.No.9563/ 2007 dex brought for the relief of efectmment.and daeoting him ts ate axl deliver "the weet 'poseeagion of the suit achedule. oro peity prvaiines in ixvour of the plaintht within a period 0 of 3 montha fom the date of judl

2. Daaiveag the perulency of this appesl, cartes have a the matter settled amicably by reducing the & terme ane conditions of settlement inte writing by way

3. The joint meme signed by the varties and ther w fteber: ert £ Pottery &.¢ me 2 EA fi a at a é bes bas ca 2 Bh TH ENE Boh BB EM ty ee a a er) Ba EI, soe ak ha Raed The learned counsel appearing for the partics p wey the Court to dispose off the appeal mm ms of the jpn a

4. Accordingly, the appeal stands dingesed off mi terme of the joint mero erxl the joint meric i ordered to be treated aa aa part of this ordsr, of (Mice = direc tek to drew final decree in eo terme of Gwe 3 int ieme and | ef the Court fe paid on tue ape mee i faa or of the

6. in view oF dieporal of Mise.CvL ic 054.2/ 2010 flied for stay does not survive pees Beenie 2 argon apg of fe BE Tie meer enn ta, 4. | Soreiceratiow and i @ orders' to be fed,