Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Central Information Commission

Mr. J D Kataria vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 6 July, 2012

                        CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
                            Club Building (Near Post Office)
                          Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067
                                 Tel: +91-11-26161796

                                                           Decision No. CIC/SG/A/2012/001430/19477
                                                                   Appeal No. CIC/SG/A/2012/001430

Relevant Facts emerging from the Appeal

Appellant                          :   Mr. J.D. Kataria
                                       9398, Tokriwalan, Azad Market
                                       Delhi- 110006

Respondent                             Mr. Rakesh Mehta

PIO & AC Municipal Corporation of Delhi O/o the Assistant Commissioner Karol Bagh zone, Anand Parvat Delhi- 110005 RTI application filled on : 15/02/2012 PIO replied : 26/05/2012 First appeal filed on : 15/03/2012 First Appellate Authority order : 30/03/2012 Second Appeal received on : 10/05/2012 Sl. Information Sought Reply of the Public Information Officer (PIO)

1. All the information related to RTI to be given The information being provided is in Hindi. in Hindi.

2. How many wards are their in the above 11 wards.

mentioned area? Names with number to be 1) Ward no. 74 - Inderlok provided with everything in detail. 2) Ward no. 91 - Karol Bagh

3) Ward no. 92 - Dev Nagar

4) Ward no. 93 - Baljit Nagar

5) Ward no. 95 - Patel Nagar

6) Ward no. 96 - South Patel Nagar

7) Ward no. 149 - Rajinder Nagar

8) Ward no. 150 - Pusa

9) Ward mo. 151 - Inderpuri

10) Ward no. 152 - Narayana

11) Ward no. 94 - West Patel Nagar

3. All licensing/ health and garden department 1)Suresh Sharma - Food, Housing inspector and R.C.O to be provided of 2)Dhanprakash Sharma - 74,96 different wards with full details. 3)Puneet Sharma - 91,95

4)Susheel Tandon - 149,152

5)Rajeev Yadav - 93,94 and 151

6)Harish Chandra - 150

7)Sohan Lal - 92

4. All the inspectors and R.C.O are deployed in Suresh Sharma was posted in April, 2011 rest have been their respective wards for how many years? posted since February, 2010.

Full details to be provided.

5. For how many years have the above No inspector has been posted here for more than 3 years.

mentioned officers served in this zone if, they have been posted here for more than 3 years then what is the reason they have not been transferred- political, official or facility charges? Information to be provided with full detail.

6. Will the related officers start proceedings for This is a personal matter and not related to the Zonal transferring an employee who has served for office. more than 3 years? Full detail to be provided on this.

Grounds for the First Appeal:

No reply from PIO.

Order of the First Appellate Authority (FAA):

FAA ordered the PIO/A.C/KBZ to provide the information to the appellant though, the appeal application reveals that the appellant has received the reply but is not satisfied with the same.

Grounds for the Second Appeal:

Not provided with full information from PIO and FAA.

Relevant Facts emerging during Hearing: The following were present Appellant: Mr. J.D. Kataria;

Respondent: Mr. Rakesh Mehta, PIO & AC;

There appears to be some mixed up of papers with the PIO. The Commission directs the PIO to provide complete point-wise information to the appellant as per the records available before 20 July 2012.

Decision:

The Appeal is allowed.

The PIO is directed to provide the information as directed above to the appellant before 20 July 2012.

This decision is announced in open chamber. Notice of this decision be given free of cost to the parties. Any information in compliance with this Order will be provided free of cost as per Section 7(6) of RTI Act.

Shailesh Gandhi Information Commissioner 06 July 2012 (In any correspondence on this decision, mention the complete decision number.)(MB) Page 2 of 2