Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Central Information Commission

Bhartendra Singh vs Rural / Gramin Banks on 8 October, 2018

                                    के   ीय सूचना आयोग
                         Central Information Commission
                              बाबा गंगनाथ माग
, मुिनरका
                          Baba Gangnath Marg, Munirka
                             नई  द
ली, New Delhi - 110067



ि तीय अपील सं या / Second Appeal No. CIC/RUGBK/A/2017/151675


Bhartendra Singh                                                ... अपीलकता /Appellant


                                         VERSUS
                                          बनाम


CPIO, Gramin Bank of Aryavart,                              ... ितवादीगण /Respondents
Head Office, Gomti Nagar,
Lucknow, U.P.


Relevant dates emerging from the appeal:

RTI : 03.02.2017               FA      : 21.03.2017           SA       : 26.07.2017

CPIO : 04.03.2017              FAO : No Order                 Hearing : 04.10.2018


                                        ORDER

1. The appellant filed an application under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (RTI Act) before the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO), Gramin Bank of Aryavart, Head Office, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow seeking information on seven points pertaining to the interview conducted for the post of Office Assistant (Multipurpose), including, inter-alia, (i) the last cut off for the final selection in the Page 1 of 3 interview and (ii) the minimum and maximum marks that the interview board was supposed to award.

2. The appellant filed a second appeal before the Commission on the grounds that the appellant is not satisfied with the information provided on point nos. 1, 2 and 5 to 7 of the RTI application. The appellant requested the Commission to direct the CPIO to provide complete and correct information to him.

Hearing:

3. The appellant Shri Bhartendra Singh and the respondent Shri Vikas Kumar Verma, Manager, Gramin Bank of Aryavart, Head Office, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow attended the hearing through videoconferencing.

4. The appellant submitted that he is not satisfied with the information provided by the CPIO as he was not selected for the post of Office Assistant (Multipurpose) despite the fact that he was not failed in the interview.

5. The respondent submitted that in response to the RTI application a point wise reply was provided to the appellant vide letter dated 04.03.2017. He stated that total marks obtained in written teat and interview were considered for final selection for the post of Office Assistant (Multipurpose). The total marks obtained by the appellant were less than the cutoff marks and, hence, he was not selected for the said post. The respondent stated that the information available on record has already been provided to the appellant and there is no further information to provide.

Decision:

6. The Commission, after hearing the submissions of both the parties and perusing the records, observes that due information has been provided to the appellant by the respondent. Hence, no further intervention of the Commission is required in the matter.

7. With the above observations, the appeal is disposed of.

8. Copy of the decision be provided free of cost to the parties.

Sudhir Bhargava (सुधीर भाग व) Information Commissioner (सूचना आयु ) दनांक / Date 05.10.2018 Authenticated true copy (अिभ मािणत स यािपत ित) S. S. Rohilla (एस. एस. रोिह ला) Dy. Registrar (उप-पंजीयक) 011-26105682 / [email protected] Addresses of the parties:

1. The Central Public Information Officer (CPIO), Gramin Bank of Aryavart, Head Office, A-2/46, Vijay Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow, U.P.

2. Shri Bhartendra Singh Page 3 of 3