Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Raashida Tabassum Pathan vs The State Of Rajasthan on 23 May, 2022

Author: Rekha Borana

Bench: Rekha Borana

         HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                         JODHPUR

                S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1084/2019




 Raashida Tabassum Pathan D/o Mehabub Khan, Aged About 30
 Years, R/o 3016, Bhur Ji Ki Sadak, Ward No. 13, Shahpura,
 Bhilwara (Raj.).
                                                                          ----Petitioner
                                          Versus
 1.       The   State         Of    Rajasthan,         Through         Secretary   Cum
          Commissioner, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj
          Department, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.).
 2.       The Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner (Raj.).
 3.       The District Education Officer, Elementary Education,
          Distt. Bhilwara (Raj.).
 4.       The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Bhilwara
          (Raj.).
                                                                       ---Respondents


For Petitioner(s)               :     Mr. Pritam Joshi
For Respondent(s)               :     Ms. Bhavan Jangid.



              HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA

Order 23/05/2022 Counsel for the petitioner submits that the controversy in the present writ petition rests decided by the Division Bench judgment passed by this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.16853/2015; Tarannum Khan vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. decided on 21.04.2017.

Counsel for the respondents does not refute the above submission.

(Downloaded on 24/05/2022 at 08:46:09 PM)

(2 of 2) [CW-1084/2019] In view of the submission made and in view of the ratio laid down in case of Tarannum Khan (supra), the present writ petition is allowed.

The respondents are directed to afford appointment to the petitioner on the post which was already kept vacant in pursuance of the order dated 23.01.2019 passed by this Court. The petitioner would be afforded appointment and would be granted notional benefits with effect from the date the person lower to her in merit had been afforded appointment.

All the pending applications also stand disposed of.

(REKHA BORANA),J Ashutosh-135(S) (Downloaded on 24/05/2022 at 08:46:09 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)