Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Rashi Peripheral Limited vs Principal Commissioner And Customs ... on 2 November, 2023

Author: G. S. Kulkarni

Bench: G. S. Kulkarni

2023:BHC-OS:13152-DB
                 Tauseef                                               17-IA.L.23273.2023.doc


                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                               ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

                              INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO.23273 OF 2023
                                                IN
                            CUSTOMS APPEAL (CUAPP) (L) NO.22393 OF 2023

                 Rashi Peripheral Limited                           ...Applicant/Appellant
                           Versus
                 Principal Commissioner & Customs
                 Authority for Advance Ruling, Mumbai & Anr.        ...Respondents

                                               ********

Mr. Jas Sanghavi i/by M/s. PDS Legal for the Applicant/Appellant. Mr. Karan Adik a/w. Ms. Kavita Shukla for the Respondent.


                                                   ********
                                            CORAM :      G. S. KULKARNI,
                                                         JITENDRA JAIN, J.J.
                                            DATE    :    2nd NOVEMBER, 2023.

                 P.C.

                 .          By this application, the Applicant/Appellant as prayed for

condonation of delay of 16 days in filing the appeal in question. It is contended that applying the provisions of Section 28KA of the Customs Act, 1962, the delay is within the condonable limits of the extended limitation of 30 days.

2. We have perused the reasons/justification in that regard in paragraphs 3 and 9 of the application, as to why the delay ought be condoned. Having considered such averments, we are of the opinion that there is sufficient explanation to condone the delay which falls 1 of 2 Tauseef 17-IA.L.23273.2023.doc within the extended period of limitation of 30 days as provided under Section 28KA of the Customs Act, 1962. It is thus in the interest of justice that the delay needs to be condoned. It is accordingly condoned by allowing the application in terms of prayer clause (a). [JITENDRA JAIN, J.] [G. S. KULKARNI, J.] Signed by: Tauseef Farooqui Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 04/11/2023 19:01:42 2 of 2