Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Central Information Commission

K Udayakumar vs Aligarh Muslim University on 22 June, 2022

                                               CIC/ALMUV/A/2021/600409

                              के   ीय सूचना आयोग
                    Central Information Commission
                         बाबा गंगनाथ माग,मुिनरका
                     Baba Gangnath Marg, Munirka
                       नई द ली, New Delhi - 110067

ि तीय अपील सं या/ Second Appeal No. CIC/ALMUV/A/2021/600409

In the matter of:

K Udayakumar                                                  ... अपीलकता/Appellant
                                       VERSUS
                                        बनाम

CPIO,                                                    ... ितवादीगण /Respondent
/Section Officer,
Aligarh Muslim University
Aligarh, Selection Committee
Section(T), Aligarh,
Uttar Pradesh - 202002

Relevant dates emerging from the appeal:

RTI Application filed on                  :   25.10.2020
CPIO replied on                           :   08.11.2020
First Appeal filed on                     :   25.11.2020
First Appellate Authority order           :   Not on Record
Second Appeal received on                 :   14.01.2021
Date of Hearing                           :   27.05.2022

The following were present:

Appellant: Absent (despite being served the hearing notice)

Respondent: Shri Haseeb Baig, SO & then CPIO, participated in the hearing
through video conferencing from NIC Aligarh




                                                                     Page 1 of 6
                                                    CIC/ALMUV/A/2021/600409

                                     ORDER

Information sought:

The Appellant filed an online RTI Application dated 25.10.2020 seeking information on the following four points:
"Subject : ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY ALIGARH (UP) Advertisement No. 2/2019(T) (1) Dated: 16.02.2019 - The Interview for Professor (Serial No:
26), Associate Professor (Serial No: 27) and Assistant Professor (Serial No:
28) has been conducted on 23.10.2020 & 24.10.2020 for College of Nursing Regarding:
1) I need the Copy of list of selected candidate for an interview for the post of Professor, Associate Professor and Assistant Professor.
2) I need the Copy of API Score of selected candidate for the aforesaid interview at College of Nursing.
3) How many candidate were fulfilled the eligible experience as per your notification among the received applications. I need the copy of eligible and non eligible candidate list.
4) Are you recruiting the Teaching staff as per UGC norms 2018?

Kindly issue the aforesaid details as soon as possible."

Shri Haseeb Baig,SO/CPIO, Selection Committee Section (Teaching), Aligarh vide letter dated 08.11.2020, denied information to the Appellant as under:

Page 2 of 6
CIC/ALMUV/A/2021/600409 Being dissatisfied, the appellant filed a First Appeal dated 25.11.2020, which has not been adjudicated by the First Appellate Authority as per available records.
Grounds for Second Appeal:
The Appellant filed a Second Appeal u/s 19 of the Act on the ground of unsatisfactory reply furnished by the Respondent. Appellant requested the Commission to direct the CPIO to provide complete information sought for.
Submissions made by Appellant and Respondent during Hearing:
The Appellant did not participate in the hearing despite being served the hearing notice.
The Respondent submitted that the relevant information as sought in the instant RTI Application could not be given to the Appellant as the averred interview was under process at that point. He further added that the requisite information regarding the selected candidates in the averred interview has been given to the Appellant in some other RTI Application.
A written submission has been received by the Commission from Shri Haseeb Baig, Former CPIO, Selection Committee Section (Teaching), AMU, Aligarh vide letter dated 21.05.2022, wherein the Commission has been apprised as under:
Page 3 of 6
CIC/ALMUV/A/2021/600409 Decision:
Upon perusal of the facts on record as well as on the basis of the proceedings during the hearing, the Commission observes that though an appropriate reply has been provided by the Respondent on point no. 2 of the RTI Application, the reply provided by the Respondent on point no. 1 and 3 of the RTI Application is not satisfactory. Hence, the Commission directs the present CPIO to provide revised reply on point no. 1 and 3 of the RTI Application to the Appellant, with a copy marked to the Commission, within 10 days from the date of receipt of this order.

The Commission further observes that point no. 4 of the RTI Application has not been attended by the Respondent and the said conduct is admonished. Hence, the Commission directs the present CPIO to provide a fresh and specific reply qua point no. 4 of the RTI Application to the Appellant, with a Page 4 of 6 CIC/ALMUV/A/2021/600409 copy marked to the Commission, within 10 days from the date of receipt of this order.

With the above observations, the instant Second Appeal is disposed of. Copy of the decision be provided free of cost to the parties.

The Appeal, hereby, stands disposed of.

Amita Pandove (अिमता पांडव) Information Commissioner (सूचना आयु ) दनांक / Date: 21.06.2022 Authenticated true copy (अिभ मािणत स यािपत ित) R. P. Grover (आर. पी. ोवर) Dy. Registrar (उप-पंजीयक) 011-26105027 Page 5 of 6 CIC/ALMUV/A/2021/600409 Addresses of the parties:

1. The First Appellate Authority (FAA) Aligarh Muslim University Aligarh, Selection Committee Section(T), Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh - 202002
2. The Central Public Information Officer /Section Officer, Aligarh Muslim University Aligarh, Selection Committee Section(T), Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh - 202002
3. Mr. K Udayakumar Page 6 of 6