Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 15, Cited by 0]

Allahabad High Court

Vikram Singh And 4 Others vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 9 December, 2020

Bench: Ramesh Sinha, Samit Gopal





HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 

?Court No. - 1
 

 
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 14384 of 2020
 

 
Petitioner :- Vikram Singh And 4 Others
 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Rahul Kumar Sharma
 
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
 

 
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J.
 

Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.

Heard Sri Rahul Singh Dahiya holding brief of Sri R.K. Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners, Km. Meena, learned AGA for the State and perused the First Information Report and the material on record.

The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioners, namely, Vikram Singh, Smt. Laxmi, Mahtab, Smt. Rekha and Suresh, seeking quashing of the First Information Report of Case Crime No. 59 of 2020 under sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506, 354A, 354B, 354C I.P.C. and 3/4 D.P. Act, police station Mahila Thana, District Hathras with a further prayer to stay the arrest during the pendency of the investigation of the said case.

It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioner no. 1 is the husband of daughter of respondent no. 4, namely, Priti @ Priyanka. Their marriage was solemnized in the year 2013. Thereafter the impugned FIR has been lodged by the respondent no. 4 roping in the entire family of his daughter's husband, petitioner no. 1 containing absolutely false, concocted, vague and sweeping allegations against them that they were demanding dowry from him and his daughter and on account of non fulfilment of the alleged demands of dowry she was being tortured and maltreated by them in her matrimonial home. He submits that petitioner no. 1 has also been challaned under section 151/107/116 Cr.P.C. The F.I.R. of the incident has been lodged after 21 days of the incident. It has next been submitted that apart from the bald allegations made in the FIR no credible evidence whatsoever is forthcoming even prima facie indicating at the petitioners' complicity in the commission of the alleged offence, hence the impugned FIR is liable to be quashed.

Learned AGA opposed the prayer for quashing of the First Information Report and argued that from the perusal of the First Information Report, a cognizable offence is made out against the petitioner, and therefore, the present writ petition be dismissed.

The Full Bench of this Court in Ajit Singh @ Muraha Vs. State of U.P. and others : (2006) 56 ACC 433 reiterated the view taken by the earlier Full Bench in Satya Pal Vs. State of U.P. and others : 2000 Cr.L.J. 569 after considering the various decisions including State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal and others : AIR 1992 SC 604 that there can be no interference with the investigation or order staying arrest unless cognizable offence is not ex-facie discernible from the allegations contained in the F.I.R. or there is any statutory restriction operating on the power of the police to investigate a case.

Further the Apex Court in the case of State of Telangana v. Habib Abdullah Jellani : (2017) 2 SCC 779 has disapproved an order restraining the Investigating Agencies arresting the accused where prayer of quashing the First Information Report has been refused.

From the perusal of the FIR, prima facie it cannot be said that no cognizable offence is made out. Hence, no ground exists for quashing of the F.I.R. or staying the arrest of the petitioners.

Accordingly, this writ petition fails and is dismissed.

The party shall file computer generated copy of order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad, self attested by it alongwith a self attested identity proof of the said person (s) (preferably Aadhar Card) mentioning the mobile number (s) to which the said Aadhar Card is linked before the concerned Court/Authority/Official.

The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of the computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.

(Samit Gopal, J.)       (Ramesh Sinha, J.)
 
Order Date :- 9.12.2020
 
Shiraz