Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Orissa High Court

Kunal Kumar Mishra vs State Of Odisha ... Opp. Party on 16 March, 2021

Author: S.K. Sahoo

Bench: S.K. Sahoo

                            BLAPL No.1395 of 2021




                   Kunal Kumar Mishra                         ...        Petitioner

                                                         -Versus-

                   State of Odisha                            ...      Opp. party


02.   16.03.2021        This    matter     is   taken    up         through   Hybrid
                   arrangement (video conferencing/physical mode).
                        Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
                   learned counsel for the State.
                        This is an application under section 439 of
                   Cr.P.C. in connection with G.R. Case No.325 of 2020
                   arising out of Joda P.S. Case No.115 of 2020 pending
                   in the Court of learned J.M.F.C., Barbil for offences
                   punishable under section 9B of Explosives Act, 1884
                   and under section 5(b) of Explosive Substances Act,
                   1908.
                        The petitioner moved an application for bail
                   before the Court of learned Addl. Sessions Judge,
                   Champua which was rejected on 13.01.2021.
                        Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that
                   the petitioner is in judicial custody since 16.07.2020
                   and charge sheet has been submitted under section 9B
                   of Explosives Act, 1884 and under section 5(b) of
                   Explosive Substances Act, 1908. He further submitted
                   that the bail application was rejected by the learned
                   trial Court mainly on the ground that the petitioner
                   belonged    to   the   State   of    Jharkhand.       He    further
                   submitted that the petitioner, in fact, is residing with
 his family in House No.688, near Tarini chak, Joda in
the State of Odisha and his daughter is prosecuting her
study in ST. TERESA'S SCHOOL, Joda and to that effect,
he has annexed the admit card as well as the fees
receipt.
      Learned counsel for the State submitted that he
has not yet obtained instruction about the averments
taken in paragraph-4 of the bail application as well as
Annexure-2 series, which are the documents of the
school of ST. TERESA'S SCHOOL, Joda.
      Considering    the   submissions    made   by   the
learned counsel for the respective parties, the nature
of accusation against the petitioner and the period of
detention of the petitioner in judicial custody, I am
inclined to release the petitioner on bail.
      Let the petitioner be released on bail in the
aforesaid case on furnishing bail bond of Rs.50,000.00
(rupees fifty thousand) with two local solvent sureties
each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the
Court in seisin over the matter with further terms and
conditions as the learned Court may deem just and
proper.
      Before accepting the bail bond, the learned trial
Court shall take instruction from the Inspector in-
charge of Joda police station as to whether the
petitioner's daughter is prosecuting her study in ST.
TERESA'S SCHOOL, Joda or not and if it is found to be
correct then, the bail bond shall be accepted.
            The BLAPL is accordingly disposed of.
           Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on
      proper application.

                                      .............................
                                       S.K. Sahoo, J.

RKM