Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

S.Selvaraj vs The Superintendent Of Police on 2 May, 2018

Author: S.Ramathilagam

Bench: S.M.Subramaniam, S.Ramathilagam

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 02.05.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
and
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.RAMATHILAGAM
									
H.C.P.No.2134 of 2017

S.Selvaraj						..	Petitioner
vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police,
   Namakkal.

2.The Inspector of Police,
   Puduchatram Police Station,
   Namakkal District.																	..  Respondents

	Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondents to produce the person of Jeyakumar, aged about 25 years, S/o.S.Selvaraj before this Hon'ble Court and set him at liberty.
			
		For petitioner	: M/s.I.Abrar MD Abdullah
		For Respondents	: M/s.Hari Hara Arun Soma Sankar.G
					    Government Advocate 	        

     ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM.,J) The relief sought for in this Habeas Corpus Petition is for a direction to direct the respondents to produce the person of Mr.Jeyakumar, aged about 25 years, son of the petitioner Mr.S.Selvaraj, before this Court and to set him at liberty.

2. The learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondents produced the confession statement recorded before the Inspector of Police, Puduchatram Police Station, Namakkal District.

3. On a perusal of the entire confession statement, it is categorically admitted that the detenu Mr.Jeyakumar and one minor girl, viz., Priya married and thereafter, the Police arrested the detenu, Mr.Jeyakumar on the ground that the minor girl was kidnapped and remanded him to judicial custody.

4. In view of the fact that a criminal case of kidnapping has been already registered under girl missing and subsequently, the case was altered into Sections 366(A) IPC and 5(1) 6 POCSO ACT against the detenu Mr.Jeyakumar and he was remanded to judicial custody. Hence, now the case has been registered and altered, no further adjudication is required in this Habeas Corpus Petition.

5.Accordingly, this Habeas Corpus Petition is closed. No costs.

							 [S.M.S.,J.]	     [S.R.T.., J.]
							            02.05.2018
kak/vsm

To
1.The Superintendent of Police,
   Namakkal.

2.The Inspector of Police,
   Puduchatram Police Station,
   Namakkal District.

3.The Public Prosecutor
   High Court, Madras.

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.,
AND
S.RAMATHILAGAM, J.

kak/vsm
















  
    H.C.P.No.2134/2017









02.05.2018