Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

The Bank Of Baroda, Branch Office Ausa ... vs Shrikrishna Madhavrao Patil ... on 24 January, 2020

Author: V. K. Jadhav

Bench: V. K. Jadhav

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                        BENCH AT AURANGABAD
                  955 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.13946 OF 2019
                           IN CRAST/34562/2019
            THE BANK OF BARODA, BRANCH OFFICE AUSA ROAD,
                  LATUR THROUGH ITS MANAGER, LATUR
                              VERSUS
            SHRIKRISHNA MADHAVRAO PATIL (THORMOTE) AND
                              OTHERS
                                      ...
                 Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Kalani Pravin N.
                                      ...
                                 CORAM :      V. K. JADHAV, J.
                                 DATE :       24.01.2020
     PER COURT :-

     1.       Heard the learned counsel for the applicant.               None

appears for the respondents though duly served. There is a delay of 39 days caused in filing the Civil Revision Application. The applicant-bank required to seek permission / consent from the Regional Office and as such the delay has been occurred.

2. In view of the same and for the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 'B'.

3. The Civil Application is accordingly disposed off.

(V. K. JADHAV, J.) ...

vmk/-

::: Uploaded on - 28/01/2020 ::: Downloaded on - 11/06/2020 09:12:01 :::