Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Smt. Samala Rajak vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 16 March, 2022

Author: Shampa Sarkar

Bench: Shampa Sarkar

16.3.2022
 Ct. No.19
Sl.no.24
sn


                            W.P.A. No. 18317 of 2021

                               Smt. Samala Rajak
                                        Vs.
                        The State of West Bengal & ors.

                     Mr. Chittaranjan Chakraborty
                     Mr. Kashiswar Ghosal
                                            .... the petitioner
                     Mr. Dipankar Pal
                     Mr. Monoranjan Mahata
                                  ..for the respondent no,6

Mr. Lalit Mohan Mahata Mr. Prasanta Behari Mahata ..for the State This matter cannot be heard without affidavits in view of the decision passed by this Court in the matter of Prahbati Sarkar & Ors. Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors. reported in (2010) 2 WBLR(Cal) 201. No interim order can be passed at this stage.

The petitioner is the sole Scheduled Caste candidate in Mankiary Gram Panchayat, District Purulia. The petitioner was removed. The petitioner proposed her name for being elected but the election was not held because none had proposed the name of the petitioner. It is submitted that the law does not permit the petitioner to propose her own name. The Hon'ble Division Bench in the matter of Prahbati Sarkar & Ors. Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors. reported in (2010) 2 WBLR(Cal) 201, held that one member should be compelled to resign and a by-election must be 2 held so that a scheduled caste candidate can be elected by the electorate and thereafter the said elected candidate may be elected as a Pradhan.

Let affidavit-in-opposition be filed within a period of four weeks; reply thereto, if any, be filed within a period of two weeks thereafter.

Liberty is given to the parties to mention the matter before the appropriate Bench after completion of the aforementioned period.

(Shampa Sarkar, J.)