Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

C.Samiselva Kirubakaran vs P.T.Manimegalai on 30 March, 2023

Author: N. Anand Venkatesh

Bench: N. Anand Venkatesh

                                                                          Crl RC .No.440 of 2018


                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED : 30.03.2023

                                                     CORAM

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH

                                              Crl RC No.440 of 2018
                                            and Crl MP No.5321 of 2018


                     C.Samiselva Kirubakaran                  ...Petitioner / Respondent
                                                       Vs.


                     1. P.T.Manimegalai

                     2. S.Lawrence                            ...Respondent / Petitioner


                     Prayer: Criminal Revision case is filed under Section 397 (1) r/w
                     401 of Cr.PC to set aside the order passed in R.C.No.63 of 2017
                     dated 14.03.2018 on the file of the II Additional Sessions Court at
                     Erode from enhancing the order of maintenance passed in MC.No.18
                     of 2018 dated 14.03.2017 on the file of the District Munsif cum
                     Judicial Magistrate Court at Perundurai and consequently, allow this
                     Criminal Revision.


                                                        1/6



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                  Crl RC .No.440 of 2018


                                            For Petitioner    : Mr.B.Lenin Balu
                                            For Respondent : Mr.R.Vigneswari
                                                             for M/s.M.Guruprasad

                                                        ORDER

This Criminal Revision case has been filed against the order passed by the II Additional District and Sessions Court, Erode in Crl RC No.63 of 2017 dated 14.03.2018, enhancing the maintenance amount payable to the 1st respondent from Rs.1,000/- to RS.2,500/- from the date of filing of the petition i.e., from 08.10.2012 onwards.

2. Heard Mr.B.Lenin Balu, learned counsel for the petitioner and M/s.R.Vigneswari, for M/s.M.Guruprasad, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.

3. The 1st respondent is the wife of the petitioner and the 2nd respondent is the son. The 1st respondent filed the maintenance 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl RC .No.440 of 2018 petition under Section 125 of Cr.PC before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Perundurai in MC No.18 of 2012. The learned Judicial Magistrate by order dated 24.07.2017, fixed the maintenance amount of Rs.1,000/- payable to the 1st respondent and a sum of Rs.2,500/- payable to the 2nd respondent.

4. Aggrieved by the above order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Perundurai, the respondents filed the Criminal Revision case before the II Additional District and Sessions Court, Erode. The learned Sessions Judge on considering the facts and circumstances of the case and after considering the income earned by the petitioner and the expenses incurred by him, was pleased to enhance the maintenance amount insofar as the 1st respondent is concerned from Rs.1,000/- to Rs.2,500/-. Insofar as the 1st respondent is concerned, the maintenance amount that was fixed by the Trial Court was sustained. Aggrieved by the same, this 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl RC .No.440 of 2018 Criminal Revision case has been filed by the respondent before this Court.

5. In the considered view of this Court, the learned II Additional District and Sessions Court at Erode, on considering the income of the petitioner and had also taken into consideration the fact that the sum of Rs.1,000/- which was ordered as maintenance was pittance with which the 1st respondent cannot sustain herself. Accordingly, maintenance was enhanced only insofar as the 1st respondent (Wife) from Rs.1,000/- to Rs.2,500/-. This Court does not find any illegality in the order passed by the Court below and this Court exercising its revisional jurisdiction will never interfere with an order where the maintenance has been fixed at the rate of Rs.2,500/- per month. In view of the fact that the 2nd respondent has already become a major, the maintenance payable to him after he attained majority comes to an end. Thereafter, it is confined 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl RC .No.440 of 2018 only to the payment of maintenance to the 1st respondent. The petitioner has to necessarily pay the maintenance to the 1st respondent who is none other than the wife of the petitioner and this Court does not find any merits in this Criminal Revision Case.

6. In the result, this Criminal Revision Case stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.





                                                                               30.03.2023
                     Internet : Yes
                     Index     : Yes
                     Speaking Order / Non Speaking Order
                     rka




                                                                 N. ANAND VENKATESH, J.

                                                         5/6



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                         Crl RC .No.440 of 2018




                                                                                          rka


                     To
                     1. II Additional Sessions Court at Erode


2. The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court at Perundurai Crl RC No.440 of 2018 30.03.2023 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis