Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Kerala High Court

P.Govindan vs State Of Kerala

Author: P.Ubaid

Bench: P.Ubaid

       

  

   

 
 
                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                    PRESENT:

                     THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.UBAID

      WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/20TH PHALGUNA, 1936

                          WP(C).No. 17455 of 2013 (F)
                            ----------------------------

PETITIONER(S):
-----------------

         P.GOVINDAN
         S/O. RAMAN NAIR, A RETIRED SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE
         RESIDING AT KANIKUNNU, THALIPARAMBA-670141
         KANNUR DISTRICT.

         BY ADV. SRI.SURESH KUMAR KODOTH

RESPONDENT(S):
-------------------

         STATE OF KERALA
         REPRESENTED BY DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
         VIGILANCE AND ANTI-CORRUPTION BUREAU, KANNUR UNI
         KANNUR-670702.

         BY ADV. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.P.MAYA

         THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
11-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 17455 of 2013 (F)
----------------------------

                                  APPENDIX

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
----------------------------

EXT.P1:         TRUE COOPY OF THE ENQUIRY REPORT DATED `10-6-08.

EXT.P2:         TRUE COPY OF FIR IN VC 4/2009/VACB KANNUR.

EXT.P3:         TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 5-7-11 BEFORE THE
                 DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE

EXT.P4:         TRTUE COPY OF THE CMP. 283/11
EXT.P5:         TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 22-12-11.
EXT.P6:         TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 24-12-`11 IN CMP NO. 283/11.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS
------------------------------


                                 /TRUE COPY/


                                            P.S TO JUDGE



                             P.UBAID, J.
                          ~~~~~~~~~~
                    W.P (C) No.17455 of 2013
                          ~~~~~~~~~~~
                 Dated this the 11th March 2015


                          J U D G M E N T

The writ petitioner herein seeks a writ of mandamus for effective investigation in a vigilance crime VC 4/2009/VACB Kannur. Now it is reported that investigation is already over, and the VACB has submitted final report in court. In such a situation, this writ petition need not proceed. It can be closed without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to seek appropriate relief as regards the final report, if he is really aggrieved.

In the result, this petition is closed without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to seek appropriate remedies under the law as regards the final report, if he is in any manner aggrieved.

Sd/-

P.UBAID JUDGE ma /True copy/ P.S to Judge