Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 3]

State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

Shri Sanjay Bapurao Yawale & Anr. vs Maharashtra State Electricity Board & ... on 21 October, 2011

  
 
 
 
 
 
 STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA
  
 
 
 







 



 
   
   
   


   
     
     
     

STATE CONSUMER
    DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,  MAHARASHTRA
    
   
    
     
     

CIRCUIT BENCH
    AT   NAGPUR
    
   
    
     
     

5 TH FLOOR,
    ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1
    
   
    
     
     

CIVIL LINES,
    NAGPUR-440 001
    
   
  
  
   

 
  
 
  
   
   

 
  
 
  
   
   
     
     
     
       
       
       

First Appeal
      No. A/08/696
      
     
      
       
       

(Arisen
      out of Order Dated 31/07/2008 in Case No. CC/08/85 of District Forum,   Amravati ) 
      
     
    
     

 
    
   
    
     
     

 
    
   
    
     
     
       
       
       
         
         
         

1.

Shri Sanjay Bapurao Yawale  

2. Shri Bapurao Baliramji Yawale   Both R/o Daryapur, Tah. Daryapur Dist. Amravati ...........Appellant(s) Versus

1. Maharashtra State Electricity Board Achalpur Division Achalpur, Through its Executive Engineer MSEB, Achalpur Dist Amravati  

2. Assistant Engineer Maharashtra State Electricity Board At Daryapur, Tah. Daryapur Dist. Amravati  

3. Jr. Engineer Maharashtra State Electricity Board At Kohlapur, Tah. Bhatkukli Dist. Amravati.

 

Maharashtra State Electricity Board now known as Maharashtra State Electricity Distrbution Company Ltd.

   

...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:

   
Hon'ble Mr.S.M. Shembole Presiding Member   Hon'ble Smt.Jayshree Yengal Member   Hon'ble Mr N. Arumugam Member PRESENT:
None ......for the Appellant   None ......for the Respondent ORDER   Per Mr S M Shembole, Hon'ble Presiding Member      The appellants as well as respondents and their respective counsel are absent. The record reflects that since the month of May 2011 both the parties are absent. 
       
Hence, appeal is dismissed in default. 
       
No order as to cost.
       
Copy of this order be supplied to the parties.
       Delivered on 21.10.2011.      
 
[ HON'BLE S.M. SHEMBOLE] PRESIDING MEMBER     [ HON'BLE SMT.JAYSHREE YENGAL] MEMBER     [ HON'BLE N. ARUMUGAM] MEMBER sj