Supreme Court - Daily Orders
State Of Bihar vs Chhotu Pandey @ Roshan Pandey on 5 January, 2015
Bench: Jagdish Singh Khehar, S.A. Bobde
1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1845 OF 2013
State of Bihar ..Appellant
versus
Chhotu Pandey @ Roshan Pandey ..Respondent
O R D E R
The issue which arises for consideration in the present appeal is, whether the respondent was a juvenile on the date of the commission of the offence. It is not in dispute that the offence was committed on 21.8.2011.
The respondent in order to establish his juvenility placed reliance on his matriculation certificate which depicted his date of birth as 2.1.1994. If the aforesaid date of birth is to be taken into consideration, the respondent would admittedly be a juvenile on the date of occurrence. Despite the availability of the matriculation certificate for the determination of the age of the respondent, the trial Court directed a medical examination of the respondent. The said direction was assailed by the respondent before the High Court. The High Court by the impugned order set aside the said direction.
Signature Not Verified
It is in these circumstances, that the State of Digitally signed by Bihar has filed the present appeal before this Court. Parveen Kumar Chawla Date: 2015.01.05 17:52:11 IST Reason:
Having given our thoughtful consideration to the controversy in hand, we are satisfied, that in terms of the 2 mandate contained in Rule 12 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Rules, 2007, in the event of the claim of juvenility being ascertainable on the basis of a matriculation certificate, it is not open to the opposite party to demand a medical examination for establishing the age of the accused/convict. Insofar as the instant aspect of the matter is concerned, this Court, having considered the matter in Ashwani Kumar Saxena vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2012) 9 SCC 750, observed as under:
“32. “Age determination inquiry” contemplated under Section 7-A of the Act read with Rule 12 of the 2007 Rules enables the court to seek evidence and in that process, the court can obtain the matriculation or equivalent certificates, if available. Only in the absence of any matriculation or equivalent certificates, the court needs to obtain the date of birth certificate from the school first attended other than a play school. Only in the absence of matriculation or equivalent certificate or the date of birth certificate from the school first attended, the court needs to obtain the birth certificate given by a corporation or a municipal authority or a panchayat (not an affidavit but certificates or documents). The question of obtaining medical opinion from a duly constituted Medical Board arises only if the abovementioned documents are unavailable. In case exact assessment of the age cannot be done, then the court, for reasons to be recorded, may, if considered necessary, give the benefit to the child or juvenile by considering his or her age on lower side within the margin of one year.” In view of the clear expression contained in Rule 12(3) of the aforementioned Rules, which have been duly considered by this Court in Ashwani Kumar Saxena's case (supra), we are satisfied, that the instant appeal filed by the State of Bihar 3 is wholly misconceived. The same is accordingly hereby rejected.
It is not a matter of dispute, that the respondent has already undergone three years of incarceration, i.e., the maximum period of incarceration by a juvenile under the provisions of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000. Keeping the above period of incarceration in mind, we direct that the respondent be released forthwith, as he must be deemed to have undergone the maximum sentence.
The instant appeal is disposed of in the above terms.
As a sequel to the above, all pending criminal miscellaneous petitions are also disposed of.
…........................J.
[JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR]
NEW DELHI; …........................J.
JANUARY 05, 2015. [S.A. BOBDE]
4
ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.5 SECTION IIA
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
CRLMP. 18844,18845,18846 & 18847 in Criminal Appeal No(s).
1845/2013
STATE OF BIHAR Appellant(s)
VERSUS
CHHOTU PANDEY @ ROSHAN PANDEY Respondent(s)
(for vacating stay and exemption from filing O.T. and bail
and office report)
Date : 05/01/2015 These application were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE For Appellant(s) Mr. Rudreshwar Singh, Adv.
for Mr. Samir Ali Khan,AOR(NP) For Respondent(s) Mr. Amit Pawan,Adv.
Mr. Salendra Pandey, Adv.
Mr. Suryodaya Tiwari, Adv.
Mr. Abhishekh Amritansu, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The appeal is disposed of in terms of the signed order.
The respondent be released forthwith, as he must be deemed to have undergone the maximum sentence under the provisions of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000.
(Parveen Kr. Chawla) (Renuka Sadana)
Court Master Court Master
[signed order is placed on the file]