Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 14]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Ramprabhav vs Tulsidas on 16 January, 2017

                               COMMON CONDITIONAL ORDER
                      IN MATTERS NOTIFIED AT SERIAL NOS. 1001 TO 1063
                               ON THE BOARD DATED 16.1.2017
                           DUE TO NON-COMPLIANCE OF COURT ORDER
16.01.2017
                      The Court proposes to pass this common conditional order to
             obviate passing of identical conditional order in these matters involving
             similar office objection/default.

                      In all these matters, due to non-removal of office objection within
             the prescribed time as per the Rules, the concerned matter was placed
             before the Registrar in the first instance. The Registrar granted sufficient
             time     to    the   petitioner(s)/applicant(s)/appellant(s)     to   cure   the
             defect/office objection, however, due to             non-removal of office
             objection/default within the prescribed time, the concerned matter was
             required to be once again listed before the Court. The Court granted
             further time, by passing common order on the earlier occasion.

                      In spite of repeated opportunity (three times-one under Rules,
             second by the Registrar and third by Court), the petitioner(s)/
             applicant(s)/appellant(s) has failed to cure the office objection/default.
             As a result, by way of indulgence and last opportunity, in terms of this
             order,        SIX    WEEKS'     further      time   is      granted    to    the
             petitioner(s)/applicant(s)/ appellant(s) in the respective matters to
             remove office objection/default and make the matter ready for further
             hearing        within   that    time,     failing   which      the    concerned
             petition/application/appeal shall stand dismissed for non-prosecution
             without further reference to the Court.

                      Provided, however, in cases, where the objection/default
             is about non-service of any of the respondent, on expiry of the

extended period, the concerned matter will stand dismissed for non-prosecution only against the unserved respondent(s), without further reference to the Court. The matter would then proceed against the remaining respondent(s).

In cases where the office objection/default has already been cured before passing of this order, it will be open to the concerned party to bring that fact to the notice of the Registrar (Judicial-II), who may examine the same and proceed with the matter as per the listing scheme, if ready for hearing.

If the office objections are removed within the time extended in terms of this order, the concerned matter(s) be made returnable on the date notified hereafter:

S.No. Cases as per Cause List No. Returnable Date 1 1001 to 1020 06/03/17 2 1021 to 1040 07/03/17 3 1041 to 1060 08/03/17 4 1061 to 1063 09/03/17 ` (J.K.Maheshwari) Judge