Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Sri Nagaraj N Naik vs The State Of Karnataka on 28 February, 2014

Bench: K.L.Manjunath, Ravi Malimath

                           1




IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

   DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2014

                      PRESENT


    THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.L.MANJUNATH

                         AND

     THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH

 WRIT PETITION NOS.18252-253 OF 2013(EDN-RES)

BETWEEN:

  1. Sri Nagaraj N.Naik
     Aged about 33 years
     S/o Madev Naik
     Agriculturist
     R/at Bailur
     Taluk Bhatkal

  2. Sri Bhaskar L Naik
     Aged about 28 years
     Agriculturist
     S/o Laxman Naik,
     R/at Hiredomi, Mavalli -1,
     Murdeshwar,
     Taluk Bhatkal,
     Uttara Kannada District.      ...PETITIONERS

(By Sri Ashok N.Nayak, Advocate)
                               2




AND:

  1. The State of Karnataka
     Represented by its Secretary
     Department of Education
     M.S.Building, Ambedkarveedhi,
     Bangalore - 01.

  2. The Commissioner
     Of Public Instructions
     Dharwad - 580 001.

  3. The Deputy Director of Public Instructions
     Uttara Kannada,
     Karwar - 581 301.

  4. The Block Education Officer
     Bhatkal,
     Uttara Kannada District - 581 320.

  5. Beena Viadya Educational Trust
     Basti Kaikini, Murdeshwara,
     Bhatkal,
     Bhatkal Taluk,
     Uttara Kannada District - 581 320
     By its Secretary.             ...RESPONDENTS

(By Smt.Niloufer Akbar, AGA for R1 to R4)

                         *****

     These Writ Petitions are filed under Article 226
and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash
the registration and permission granted to 5th
                             3




respondent vide Annexure-C dated 12.12.2011 issued
by the 3rd respondent etc.,

      These Writ Petitions coming on for preliminary
hearing this day, K.L.Manjunath J., made the
following:-

                        ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioners submit that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty to avail other remedies open for them.

2. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to avail other remedies available to them in accordance with Law.

Sd/-

JUDGE Sd/-

JUDGE JJ