Gujarat High Court
State Of Gujarat vs Govindbhai Mathurbhai Jani on 2 May, 2025
Author: Sunita Agarwal
Bench: Sunita Agarwal
NEUTRAL CITATION
C/CA/1160/2025 ORDER DATED: 02/05/2025
undefined
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 1160 of
2025
In F/MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 331 of 2025
With
F/MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 331 of 2025
In R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 74 of 2024
With
CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR STAY) NO. 1 of 2025 In F/MISC. CIVIL
APPLICATION NO. 331 of 2025
In R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 74 of 2024
==========================================================
STATE OF GUJARAT
Versus
GOVINDBHAI MATHURBHAI JANI & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MS HETAL PATEL AGP for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR BJ TRIVEDI(921) for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MRS. JUSTICE
SUNITA AGARWAL
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE
Date : 02/05/2025
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MRS. JUSTICE SUNITA AGARWAL) The Review Application has been filed with the delay of 268 days, for which no plausible explanation has been offered in the Application seeking Condonation of Delay. The reference to various communications made prior to filing of the Review Application do not form plausible explanation. The delay in taking the decision does not make out a sufficient cause to condone the delay. The reference to the communications between the authorities prior to grant of sanction for the purpose of filing the Revision Application, is only an eye-wash. Even otherwise, the grounds for review are not Page 1 of 2 Uploaded by CHANDRASHEKHAR MEHESHKUMAR KOSHTI(HC01066) on Sat May 03 2025 Downloaded on : Sat May 03 21:03:23 IST 2025 NEUTRAL CITATION C/CA/1160/2025 ORDER DATED: 02/05/2025 undefined within the four corners of review, as no error, apparent on the face of the record, could be demonstrated. The grounds taken for review are in the nature of re-arguing the matter, which is not permissible within the scope of review.
The Review Application is, accordingly, rejected both on the grounds of delay as well as on merits. The Civil Application for stay also stands disposed of.
(SUNITA AGARWAL, CJ ) (ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE, J.) cmk Page 2 of 2 Uploaded by CHANDRASHEKHAR MEHESHKUMAR KOSHTI(HC01066) on Sat May 03 2025 Downloaded on : Sat May 03 21:03:23 IST 2025