Karnataka High Court
Smt K N Sumalatha @ K A Lavanya vs State Bank Of India on 21 September, 2017
Author: A.S.Bopanna
Bench: A.S. Bopanna
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2017
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA
WRIT PETITION Nos.41609-41612/2017 (GM-TEN)
BETWEEN:
1. SMT. K.N.SUMALATHA @ K.A.LAVANYA
W/O.LATE SRI K.A.SUBRAMANYA
AGED 42 YEARS
NO.53, BINNY LAYOUT II PHASE
10TH MAIN, VIJAYANAGAR
BANGALORE-560 040.
2. SRI K.V.ANANTHA PADMANABHA
S/O.LATE SRI K.A.SUBRAMANYA
AGED 75 YEARS
NO.53, BINNY LAYOUT II PHASE
10TH MAIN, VIJAYANAGAR
BANGALORE-560 040.
3. MR. SHASHANK
S/O.LATE SRI K.A.SUBRAMANYA
AGED 21 YEARS
NO.53, BINNY LAYOUT II PHASE
10TH MAIN, VIJAYANAGAR
BANGALORE-560 040.
4. SRI K.A.ASHWATH NARAYAN
AGED 37 YEARS
NO.401, VIJAYALAKSHMI APARTMENT
ABHAYA REDDY LAYOUT
KAGGADASAPURA
BANGALORE-560 093. ...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI D.R.RAVISHANKAR, ADV.)
AND:
1. STATE BANK OF INDIA
HEAD OFFICE:
2
"STATE BANK BHAVAN"
8TH FLOOR
MADAME CAMA ROAD
NEAR VIDHAN BHAVAN
NIRMAN POINT
MUMBAI-400 021
REPRESENTED BY ITS
MANAGING DIRECTOR.
2. STRESSED ASSETS
MANAGEMENT GROUP
BRANCH:BANGALORE
LHO CAMPUS, NO.65
ST. MARKS ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001.
3. SHANTHI CHARITABLE
TRUST (REGISTERED)
KAGGADASAPURA MAIN ROAD
VIGNANA NAGAR
NEW THIPPASANDRA POST
BANGALORE-560 075
BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE
SRI BASAVARAJ V.V. ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI K. PRAKASH, ADV. FOR CAVEATOR R2)
THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLE
226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH
THE ANNEXURE-D THE AUCTION NOTIFICATION DATED
16.08.2017 IN TENDER IN SO FAR AS THE SCHEDULE
PROPERTIES ARE CONCERNED AND ETC.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR
PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE
FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The petitioners are before this Court assailing the auction notification dated 16.08.2017 as at Annexure-D to the petitions.
3
2. The respondents No.1 and 2, who have entered caveat, have filed a memo dated 21.09.2017 through the learned counsel representing respondent No.2 indicating therein that the auction sale notice fixing the auction on 25.09.2017 has been cancelled. If that be the position, further consideration in these petitions would not arise, as the prayer has rendered itself infructuous.
3. In the meanwhile, if the petitioners desire to settle the matter with the respondents No.1 and 2 before any fresh action is initiated by them, the petitioners may submit their proposal for settlement and if such proposal is submitted, the respondents No.1 and 2 shall consider the same in accordance with law, before any fresh action is initiated.
The writ petitions are accordingly disposed of.
Sd/-
JUDGE ST