Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Narayana Gowda K P vs Mr M B Rajesh Gowda Ias on 25 July, 2022

Author: Alok Aradhe

Bench: Alok Aradhe

                          1



 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

         DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JULY 2022

                      PRESENT

            THE HON'BLE MR. ALOK ARADHE
                ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

                         AND

     THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. VISHWAJITH SHETTY

                C.C.C. NO.383 OF 2022

BETWEEN:

1.    NARAYANA GOWDA K.P.
      S/O LATE PUTTAVENKATE GOWDA
      AGED 67 YEARS
      RESIDENT OF NO.825
      SUVEY NO.136
      CHELEKERE VILLGE
      ARKAVATHI LAYOUT
      19TH BLOCK
      KALYAN NAGAR POST
      BENGALURU 560043.

2.    LAKSHMANA SAVANURU
      S/O LATE P.B. SAVANURU
      AGED 56 YEARS
      RESIDENT OF NO.22
      BASAPPA LANE
      TANNERY ROAD, FRAZER TOWN
      BENGALURU 560005.

                                  ... COMPLAINANTS


(BY MRS. KUSUM RANGANATH, ADV.,)
                           2



AND:

MR. M.B. RAJESH GOWDA, IAS
COMMISSIONER
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD
KUMARA PARK WEST
BENGALURU 560020.
                                         ... ACCUSED

(BY MR. D.N. NANJUNDA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR
    MR. GOWTHAMDEV C. ULLAL, ADV.,)
                         ---

     THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF
THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT 1971, R/W ARTICLE 215
OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO INITIATE
CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED FOR
WILLFUL DISOBEDIENCE OF THE ORDER OF THIS HON BLE
COURT PASSED IN WP NO.14501/2020 DATED 17.08.2021.

     THIS CCC COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MADE THE FOLLOWING:

                         ORDER

Smt.Kusum Ranganath, learned counsel for the complainants.

Mr.D.N.Nanjunda Reddy, learned Senior counsel for the respondent.

3

This petition has been filed for non-compliance of the order dated 17.08.2021 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.14501/2020.

2. Learned counsel for the complainant submitted that this contempt petition does not survive for consideration as the aforesaid order has already been recalled in a review petition namely R.P.No.539/2022.

3. In view of the aforesaid submission, we are not inclined to proceed further with the contempt proceedings.

Accordingly, the contempt petition is disposed of.

Sd/-

ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/-

JUDGE RV