Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court

Tata Consultancy Services Limited vs Forum Project Holdings Pvt. Ltd on 4 August, 2023

Author: Moushumi Bhattacharya

Bench: Moushumi Bhattacharya

OCD-10
                                ORDER SHEET

                               IA No.GA/1/2023
                                      In
                                 AP/429/2023

                     IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
                      Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction
                               ORIGINAL SIDE
                            (Commercial Division)

                  TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITED
                               Versus
                   FORUM PROJECT HOLDINGS PVT. LTD.


  BEFORE:
  The Hon'ble JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA
  Date : 4th August, 2023.



                                                                       Appearance:
                                                      Mr. Jishnu Chowdhury, Adv.
                                                       Mr. Soumabho Ghose, Adv.
                                                          Mr. Ritoban Sarkar, Adv.
                                                            Mr. S. K. Singhee, Adv.
                                                         Mr. Sayan Banerjee, Adv.
                                                                 ...for the petitioner

                                                   Mr. Suddhasatva Banerjee, Adv.
                                                           Mr. Aditya Sarkar, Adv.
                                                              ...for the respondent

The Court: This is an application filed by the respondent in a Section 9 application which was disposed of by an order dated 12th July, 2023. The respondent was directed to put in the amount of Rs.1.64 crores in a separate interest bearing account with the State Bank of India and maintain the same until orders are passed in the arbitration proceedings. 2

Learned counsel appearing for the applicant (respondent in the arbitration proceeding) submits that the respondent has complied with the directions passed by the Court but has deposited the amount with ICICI Bank instead of the State Bank of India.

The receipt of the ICICI Bank reflecting the fixed deposit amount is part of the application.

Since the respondent has carried out the directions of the order dated 12th July, 2023, this Court finds no difficulty in allowing the respondent to change the bank.

GA/1/2023 is, accordingly, allowed and disposed of. The petitioner in the arbitration proceeding is represented.

(MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA, J.) kc