Madras High Court
Thyrocare Hospitals Ltd vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 20 December, 2017
Author: M.S.Ramesh
Bench: M.S.Ramesh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 20.12.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH
Crl.O.P.No.28624 of 2017
Thyrocare Hospitals Ltd.,
Rep by its Director & Authorized Signatory,
Mr.A.Sundararaju,
Having its Registered Office at Tanushree Heights,
Flat No.601, 6th Floor, Plot No.34, Sector 42A, Nerul ...Petitioner
Vs.
1. The State of Tamil Nadu,
Rep. by the Superintendent of Police(Rural)
State Bank Road, Coimbatore-641 018.
2. The Inspector of Police,
Chettipalayam Police Station,
Coimbatore-641 201. ...Respondents
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying to direct the respondents to register a complaint by lodging a First Information Report on the complaint of the petitioner dated 06.09.2017, conduct investigation and proceed in accordance with law.
For Petitioner : Mr.Sundar Narayan
For Respondents : Mr.C.Iyyappa Raj
Additional Public Prosecutor.
ORDER
This petition is filed seeking a direction to the second respondent to register the complaint given by the petitioner dated 06.09.2017 .
2.By consent of both sides, this Criminal Original Petition is taken up for final disposal.
3.The grievance of the petitioner is that inspite of a complaint given by the petitioner on 06.09.2017 to the first respondent , the same has been kept in abeyance without any action. It is well settled in the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and others [2013 (6) CTC 353], that registration of an FIR is mandatory under Section 154 of the Code of Criminal Procedure if an information furnished to the police officer disclose commission of a cognizable offence and in cases where the information does not disclose a cognizable offence, a preliminary enquiry has to be conducted.
4. The first respondent is not justified in having received the complaint and keeping it unattended without any further action. In view of the same, the petitioner has made out a case for this Court to invoke its inherent powers under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
5.In the result, the petitioner is directed to give a copy of the complaint dated 06.09.2017 to the Station House Officer having territorial jurisdiction over the issue. On receipt of the said copy of the complaint, the concerned Station House Officer shall adhere to the following directions.
1)If the information received by the second respondent discloses commission of a cognizable offence, then, the same shall be forthwith registered.
2)If an information received does not disclose a cognizable offence, the second respondent shall conduct a preliminary inquiry to ascertain whether cognizable offence is disclosed therein or not and such inquiry shall be completed within a period of fifteen days from the date of information.
3) If the inquiry discloses the commission of a cognizable offence, the FIR must be registered, if not already registered or closed.
4) If the preliminary inquiry ends in closing the complaint, the closure report must be recorded along with the reasonings and a copy of the same shall be furnished to the complainant within one week.
M.S.RAMESH.J., smn
5)All information relating to cognizable offences whether resulting in registration of FIR or leading an inquiry must be reflected in the general diary/station diary/daily diary of the second respondent's police station.
6. In the result, the Criminal Original Petition is allowed with the above directions.
20.12.2017 Index:Yes/No Internet: Yes/No smn To
1. The Superintendent of Police(Rural) State Bank Road, Coimbatore-641 018.
2. The Inspector of Police, Chettipalayam Police Station, Coimbatore-641 201.
3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. Crl.O.P.No.28624 of 2017