Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 6, Cited by 1]

Bombay High Court

Puja @ Dipali Shivcharan Agarwal vs The State Of Maharashtra on 4 November, 2020

Author: C.V. Bhadang

Bench: C.V. Bhadang

                                                              7, 12, 18,19 & 22 aba st 3915-20 grp



                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
 Sneha                         CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
 N.
 Chavan               CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION (ST) NO. 3915 OF 2020
Digitally signed
by Sneha N.
Chavan
                   Subhash Nagnath Jadhav                            .. Applicant
Date: 2020.11.05        V/s.
10:42:57 +0530


                   The State of Maharashtra                          ..Respondent

                                                  WITH
                      CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION (ST) NO. 3952 OF 2020

                   Jayant Pandurang Shelake                          .. Applicant
                        V/s.

                   The State of Maharashtra                          ..Respondent

                                                  WITH
                      CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION (ST) NO. 3951 OF 2020

                   Shivcharan Mulchand Agarwal               .. Applicant
                        V/s.

                   The State of Maharashtra                  ..Respondent

                                                  WITH
                      CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION (ST) NO. 3948 OF 2020

                   Puja @ Dipali Shivcharan Agarwal          .. Applicant
                        V/s.

                   The State of Maharashtra                  ..Respondent

                                                  WITH
                      CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION (ST) NO. 3974 OF 2020



                   Suresh @ Suryakant Annapa Kokatnur                .. Applicant
                        V/s.

                   The State of Maharashtra                          ..Respondent



                      Sneha Chavan                                                  page 1 of 5
                                                7, 12, 18,19 & 22 aba st 3915-20 grp


                                   WITH
       CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION (ST) NO. 4022 OF 2020

Subhash Guruling Rajmane                              .. Applicant
     V/s.

The State of Maharashtra                              ..Respondent

                                   WITH
       CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION (ST) NO. 4025 OF 2020

Soham @ Soham Surendra Gaikwad                        .. Applicant
    V/s.

The State of Maharashtra                              ..Respondent
                                 ----
Mr. Balkrishna Joshi for the Applicant in ABA(ST)/3915/2020
Mr. Aabad Ponda, Senior Advocate a/w Vrushali Maindad for the
Applicant in ABA(ST)/ 3952/2020.
Mr. Aniket Nikam a/w Mr. V.V. Arote           for the Applicant in
ABA(ST)/3951/2020 and ABA(ST)/3978/2020.
Mr. V.V. Purwant for the Applicant in ABA(ST)/4022/2020 & ABA
(ST)/3974/2020.
Mr. Ritesh Thobade for the Applicant in ABA(ST)/4025/2020.
Mr. H. J. Dedhia, APP for the Respondent-State in
ABA(ST)/3915/2020 & ABA (ST)/3951/2020.
Mr. Arfan Sait APP for the Respondent-State in ABA(ST)/3952/2020
and ABA (ST)/3974/2020.
Mrs.     M.H.Mhatre,     APP    for     the   Respondent-State  in
ABA(ST)/3978/2020.

                                    ----
                            CORAM : C.V. BHADANG, J.

                            DATE : 04th November, 2020
                            (Through Video Conferencing)

P.C.


1.        Criminal Anticipatory Bail Application (ST) Nos. 4022 of 2020

and 4025 of 2020 are not on board. The same are taken on board.

       Sneha Chavan                                                  page 2 of 5
                                               7, 12, 18,19 & 22 aba st 3915-20 grp


2.      All these applications are by the accused in Crime No. 1238 of

2020 registered with Jail Road Police Station, Solapur City, District

Solapur under Section 306, 504, 506 of I.P.C. and Section 39 and 45

of the Maharashtra Money Lending (Regulation) Act, 2014.



3.      Although, the role played by each of the applicants is

distinguishable on some aspects, it is the common contention raised

on behalf of the applicants, that even assuming that the deceased

committed suicide, the demand allegedly made by the applicants or

the ill-treatment meted out and the coercion practiced cannot

amount to an offence of abetment of suicide under Section 306 of

I.P.C.. It is common contention on behalf of the applicants, that a

person lending money would only be interested in recovery of the

amount and he may not be intending or even knowing that the

person borrowing would commit suicide.



4.      For the purpose of said proposition, reliance is placed by Mr.

Nikam, the learned Counsel for the applicant in Cr. ABA No. 3951

and 3948 of 2020 on the decision of the Supreme Court in the case

of Madan Mohan Singh v/s. State of Gujarat and Anr (2010) 3 SCC

(Cri) 1048; the order passed by this court in the case of Santosh

Nathumal Goenka and Ors. v/s State of Maharashtra (Criminal

     Sneha Chavan                                                   page 3 of 5
                                               7, 12, 18,19 & 22 aba st 3915-20 grp


Application No. 2553 of 2019 decided on 06.10.2009), Milind

Makaji Barate v/s. State of Maharashtra (ABA No. 1020/2016

decided on 21.06.2016) and Sainath Bhiraj Kapse V/s. State of

Maharashtra,(ABA No. 521/2020 decided on 17.07.2020) in order

to submit that in the context of similar allegations it was found

prime facie that the offence under Section 306 is not made out.



5.      The learned A.P.P. appearing in these applications have placed

reliance on Section 107 of IPC in order to submit that the abetment

can either be by instigation, engagement in conspiracy or by

intentional aiding, by any act or illegal omission of doing of that

thing. It is submitted that it would be a matter which would depend

upon the facts and circumstances of the case whether the act and

the coercion practiced is of such a degree so as to amount to

intentionally aiding of the act of committal of suicide by the

deceased.



6.      The learned APP sought time to assist the court further in the

matter.



7.      Having regard to the over all circumstances for the present,

the following order is passed:

     Sneha Chavan                                                   page 4 of 5
                                                       7, 12, 18,19 & 22 aba st 3915-20 grp




                                       ORDER

i) In the event of their arrest, in connection with the investigation of Crime No. 1238 of 2020 registered with Solapur City Police Station, Dist. Solapur, the applicants shall be released on bail on executing a PR Bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/-each with one or two solvent sureties each in the like amount.

ii) The Applicants shall attend the Investigating Officer once in two weeks on Monday between 11.00 a.m. to 1.00 p.m. and as and when required by the Investigating Officer.

iii) The first of such attendance shall be made on 16.11.2020.

iv) The Applicants shall co-operate with the Investigating Agency in all respect and shall not directly or indirectly make any attempt to contact, influence or coerce the complainant and shall not otherwise tamper with the prosecution evidence/witnesses.

v) In the event of breach of any of the conditions, the interim protection is liable to be vacated.

vi) This order shall remain in force till next date.

8. Stand over to 25.11.2020.

C.V. BHADANG, J.

     Sneha Chavan                                                           page 5 of 5