Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Kerala High Court

M/S. Asian Motors Mp Iv/165 vs State Of Kerala on 28 December, 2015

Author: A.M. Shaffique

Bench: A.M.Shaffique

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                            PRESENT:

            THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE

     THURSDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF AUGUST 2016/3RD BHADRA, 1938

                  WP(C).No. 28182 of 2016 (W)
                  ----------------------------


PETITIONER:
-----------

           M/S. ASIAN MOTORS  MP IV/165,
           6 TO 167, EDAPPALLY, KALPATTA,
           WAYANAD, REPRESENTED BY ITS
           PARTNER MR.ANTO AUGUSTINE.


            BY ADVS.SMT.K.LATHA
                   SMT.M.K.HAJARA
                   SRI.C.RAMACHANDRAN

RESPONDENT(S):
--------------

          1.STATE OF KERALA,
            REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY
            TO THE GOVT. OF KERALA,
            SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

          2.THE INSPECTING ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER,
            COMMERCIAL TAX DEPARTMENT, WAYANAD-670110.

          3.THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (APPELAS)/
            THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS),
            COMMERCIAL TAXES, KOZHIKODE - 670 115.

          4.TAHSILDAR (REVENUE RECOVERY)/
            SALES TAX OFFICER,(REVENUE RECOVERY),
            COMMERCIAL TAXES, AMBALAVAYAL,
            WAYANAD - 671 105.


            BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.C.P.PRADEEP


       THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL)  HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
       ON  25-08-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
       FOLLOWING:
mbr/

WP(C).No. 28182 of 2016 (W)
----------------------------

                            APPENDIX

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:
-----------------------

EXHIBIT P1   :  COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE YEAR 2014-
                2015 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE
                PETITIONER DATED 28.12.2015.

EXHIBIT P2   :   COPY OF THE APPEAL IN FORM NO.29 ALONG WITH
                GROUND OF APPEAL FILE BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE
                THE 3RD RESPONDENT AGAINST THE P1 ASSESSMENT
                ORDER FOR THE YEAR 2014-2015.

EXHIBIT P3   :   COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE
                PETITIONER IN THE P2 APPEAL.

EXHIBIT P4   :   COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE BASED ON THE P1
                ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE YEAR 2014-2015 ISSUED
                TO THE PETITIONER DATED 28.12.2015 ALONG WITH
                THE REVENUE RECOVERY NOTICE DATED 23.3.2016
                ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER
                AGAINST THE DEMAND OF RS.1,50,811/- BASED ON THE
                P1 ASSESSMENT ORDER.


RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:         NIL
-----------------------


                                            //TRUE COPY//


                                            P.S. TO JUDGE


mbr/



                     A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.
              -------------------------------------
                  W.P.(C) No. 28182 of 2016
               --------------------------------------
            Dated this the 25th day of August, 2016


                           JUDGMENT

Petitioner has filed Ext.P2 appeal as well as Ext.P3 application for stay before the 3rd respondent. It is submitted that during the pendency of the appeal, steps are being taken by the respondent authorities for recovering the amount in terms of Ext.P4 demand notice.

2. Having regard to the fact that an appeal is pending before the competent authority, I do not think it necessary to consider the matter on merits. Suffice to say that the appellate authority has to consider the stay petition on merits within a specified time and in the meantime, recovery can be kept in abeyance.

Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of as under:

i) The 3rd respondent shall consider Ext.P3 stay petition filed along with the appeal within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
W.P.(C) No. 28182 of 2016 -2-
ii) In the meantime, the demand made in terms of Ext.P4 shall be kept in abeyance.

Sd/-

A.M. SHAFFIQUE JUDGE Scl/25.08.2016