Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Ramasubbu vs State Rep By The Inspector Of Police . on 14 September, 2015

Bench: Jagdish Singh Khehar, R. Banumathi

     ITEM NO.12                               COURT NO.4                   SECTION IIA

                                   S U P R E M E C O U R T O F          I N D I A
                                           RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).6622/2015

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 03/07/2015
     in CRLOP No.11119/2015 passed by the High Court of Madras at
     Madurai)

     RAMASUBBU                                                              Petitioner(s)

                                                      VERSUS

     STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE & ORS.                            Respondent(s)

     (With interim relief and office report)

     Date : 14/09/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR
                             HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI

     For Petitioner(s)                    Mr.Shyam Divan, Sr.Adv.
                                          Mr.A.R.Sethupathi, Adv.
                                          Mr. S. Ravi Shankar, Adv.

     For Respondent(s)                    Mr. A. Venayagam Balan, Adv.
                                          Mrs.V.S.Lakshmi, Adv.

                                          Mr.M.Yogesh Kanna, Adv.
                                          Mr.Jayant Patel, Adv.

                         Upon hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                            O R D E R

Learned counsel for the respondent does not dispute the fact that the petitioner appeared before respondent No.1 on 17.08.2015 (at the time indicated in the Motion Bench order dated 14.08.2015). It is also not disputed, that even thereafter, the petitioner appeared before the Investigating Officer as and when he was summoned.

In view of the above, we dispose of the instant petition Signature Not Verified by confirming the order dated 14.08.2015.

Digitally signed by Satish Kumar Yadav Date: 2015.09.14 16:30:53 IST Reason:
     (SATISH KUMAR YADAV)                                                    (RENUKA SADANA)
          AR-CUM-PS                                                           COURT MASTER