Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Unknown vs By Advs.Sri.M.Ramesh Chander

Author: Alexander Thomas

Bench: Alexander Thomas

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                       PRESENT:

                  THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS

                 FRIDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JUNE 2018 / 8TH ASHADHA, 1940

                                 WP(C).No. 17771 of 2018




PETITIONER


     BABU,
     AGED 51 YEARS, S/O. LATE SHAMBU,
     BEKAL, PALLIKKARE 2ND VILLAGE,
     NEAR SREE KURUMBA BHAGAVATHI TEMPLE,
     BEKAL, KASARAGOD DISTRICT.


     BY ADVS.SRI.M.RAMESH CHANDER , SENIOR ADVOCATE
             SMT.K.A.SANJEETHA
             SRI.BALU TOM


RESPONDENTS:

1.   LEELA K., W/O.LATE SHAMBU,
     K.K. HOUSE, NEAR SREE KURUMBA BHAGAVATHI TEMPLE,
     BEKAL, KASARAGOD DISTRICT.

2.   PRESIDING OFFICER,
     MAINTENANCE TRIBUNAL AND REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,
     KANHANGAD - 671 315.

3.   STATION HOUSE OFFICER,
     BEKAL POLICE STATION, KASARAGOD DISTRICT,
     PIN - 671 318.

        R1 BY ADVS. SRI. BALU TOM
                    SRI.SURESH KUMAR KODOTH
                    SRI.K.P.ANTONY BINU
        R2 & R3 BY SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. SAIGI JACOB PALATTY


     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
     ON 29-06-2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
     FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 17771 of 2018 (V)

                                       APPENDIX

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS


EXHIBIT P1         PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE JUDICIAL
                   FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-II, HOSDURG DATED
                   10.01.2018 IN MC 237/16

EXHIBIT P2         PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE APPLICATION BY THE 1ST
                   RESPONDENT DATED 28.02.2018

EXHIBIT P3         PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE 2ND
                   RESPONDENT DATED 18.04.2018

EXHIBIT P4         PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE COUNTER FILED BY THE
                   PETITIONER DATED 25.05.2018

EXHIBIT P5         PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE 2ND
                   RESPONDENT DATED 28.04.2018

EXHIBIT P6         PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE COUNTER FILED BY THE
                   PETITIONER DATED 23.05.2018


RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS
--------------------


EXT.R1(A)    TRUE COPY OF FIR NO. 56/2017 OF BEKAL POLICE STATION

EXT.R1(B)    TRUE COPY OF FIR NO 79/2018 OF BEKAL POLICE STAITON

EXT.R1(C)    TRUE COPY OF CRL MP 1814/18 IN CRL APPEAL NO. 22/18 BEFORE
             DISTRICT COURT

EXT.R1(D)    TRUE COPY OF COMPLAINT DATED 4.6.18

EXT.R1(E)    TRUE COPY OF COMPLAINT DATED 5.6.18

                                                   /TRUE COPY/

                                                   PA TO JUDGE

sdr/-
6.7.18

                   ALEXANDER THOMAS, J.
                -------------------------------------------
                     W.P.(C)No.17771 of 2018
               ---------------------------------------------
              Dated this the 29th day of June, 2018

                             JUDGMENT

The 1st respondent herein is the mother of the petitioner herein. The petitioner is aggrieved by the impugned Ext.P3 order dated 18.4.2018 and the directions issued in the letter dated 28.4.2018 by the 2nd respondent Tribunal (presided over by the R.D.O., Kanhangad, Kasaragod District), under the provisions of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007. The 1 st respondent (mother) had filed a complaint under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 before the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court, Hosdurg as M.C.No.237 of 2016, seeking protection against domestic violence allegedly committed by the petitioner. The said application under the Domestic Violence Act was dismissed by the learned Magistrate as per Ext.P1 order dated 10.1.2018. Aggrieved thereby the 1st respondent had filed Crl.Appeal No.22 of 2018 before the Sessions Court, Kasaragod so as to impugn Ext.P1 order. In the said Criminal Appeal, the Sessions Court had passed an interlocutory direction as per order dated 23.3.2018 on Crl.M.P.No.599 of 2018 in the said Criminal Appeal directing the W.P.(C)No.17771/2018 ..2..

respondents therein (petitioner herein and his wife), not to obstruct the peaceful residence of the appellant therein (respondent No.1 herein), in the residence and not to commit any act of domestic violence on her. In the meanwhile, the 1st respondent had filed Ext.P2 application dated 28.2.2018 before the 1st respondent/ Tribunal, under the provisions contained under Rule 4(1) of the Rules framed under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007. In Column No.4 of Ext.P2 application, which deals with 'reason for making the application', is shown as b