Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 61]

Kerala High Court

K.P.Binu Raj Alias K.P.Binukumar vs K.P.Binu Raj Alias K.P.Binukumar on 20 July, 2006

       

  

   

 
 
                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALAAT ERNAKULAM

                                                         PRESENT:

                            THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD

                     TUESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF JULY 2015/16TH ASHADHA, 1937

                                               RSA.No. 891 of 2006 ( F)
                                                    ------------------------
       AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN AS NO. 288/2003 of SUB COURT,NEYYATTINKARA
                                                   DATED 20-07-2006

      AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE IN OS NO. 1526/1990 of PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
                                COURT,NEYYATTINKARA DATED 28-02-2003

APPELLANT/14TH RESPONDENT/ADDL.DEFENDANT NO.17:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

            K.P.BINU RAJ ALIAS K.P.BINUKUMAR,
            S/O.PRABHAKARAN NADAR, KUZHINGAKALA, MURUKA VILASOM
            MACHIYODU DESOM, CHENKAL VILLAGE.

            BY ADVS.SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN
                         SRI.SAIJO HASSAN
                         SRI.SABU SREEDHARAN
                         SRI.VIMAL KUMAR.A.V.
                         SRI.A.G.GIRISHKUMAR

RESPONDENT(S)/APPELLANT/RESPONDENTS 1 TO 13/PLAINTIFF/
DEFENDANTS 1, 3,4,6,7,8 AND 10,11,14,15 & 16:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. JANARDHANAN SASIDHARAN,
            MURUKAVILASOM BUGLOW, KUZHINGAKALA, MACHIKODE DESOM
            CHENKAL VILLAGE.

       2. KARTHIYAYINI SANTHAKUMARY,
            MUNDAPLAVILA PUTHEN VEEDU, PARAVOOR DESOM
            CHENKAL VILLAGE.

       3. SUBRAMONIYAN NADAR PRABHAKARAN NADAR,
            MURUKAVILASOM BUNGLOW, MACHIKODE DESOM
            HAVING ALSO GIREESH BHAVAN, KALLUVILA, NOCHIYOOR DESOM
            CHENKAL VILLAGE.

       4. BHAGEERATHI AMMA,
            KUZHINJAKALA MURUKAVILASOM BUNGLOW,NOCHIYOOR DESOM
            CHENKAL VILLAGE.

       5. BHAGEERATHI AMMA SULOCHANA,
            KUZHINJAKALA MURUKAVILASOM BUNGLOW,NOCHIYOOR DESOM
            CHENKAL VILLAGE.

RSA NO.891/2006           2


    6. JANARDHANAN SUKUMARAN,
        KUZHINJAKALA MURUKAVILASOM BUNGLOW,NOCHIYOOR DESOM
        CHENKAL VILLAGE.

    7. BHAGEERATHI AMMATHANKAMONI,
        KUZHINJAKALA MURUKAVILASOM BUNGLOW,NOCHIYOOR DESOM
        CHENKAL VILLAGE.

    8. JANARDHANAN MANOHARAN,
        KUZHINJAKALA MURUKAVILASOM BUNGLOW,NOCHIYOOR DESOM
        CHENKAL VILLAGE.

    9. BHAGEERATHI AMMA KANCHANA,
        KUZHINJAKALA MURUKAVILASOM BUNGLOW,NOCHIYOOR DESOM
        CHENKAL VILLAGE.

    10. JANARDHANAN PREMAN,
        KUZHINJAKALA MURUKAVILASOM BUNGLOW,NOCHIYOOR DESOM
        CHENKAL VILLAGE.

    11. JANARDHANAN SHYLESHKUMAR,
        KUZHINJAKALA MURUKAVILASOM BUNGLOW,NOCHIYOOR DESOM
        CHENKAL VILLAGE.

    12. SUBHASHINI, D/O.KARTHIYANI,
        MINI COTTAGE, CHAMBAYIL ROAD, KADAVATTARAM DESOM
        NEYYATTINKARA VILLAGE.

    13. DAKSHAYANI KARTHIYAYINI,
        GIREESH BHAVAN, KALLUVILA, NOCHIYOOR DESOM
        CHENKAL VILLAGE.

        R2 & R12 BYADV.SRI.BLAZE K.JOSE


        THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
07-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:



                             A.HARIPRASAD, J.
                        --------------------------------------
                           R.S.A. No.891 of 2006
                        --------------------------------------
                  Dated this the 7th day of July, 2015

                                  JUDGMENT

Heard the learned counsel for the appellant. Perused memo dated 23.06.2015. Learned counsel submitted that the parties have settled the matter. Hence, he seeks permission to withdraw the appeal.

Permission is granted. Appeal dismissed as withdrawn. All pending interlocutory applications will stand dismissed.

A. HARIPRASAD, JUDGE.

cks