Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 7, Cited by 0]

Orissa High Court

BLAPL/2730/2018 on 2 May, 2018

Author: J.P. Das

Bench: J.P. Das

                                            BLAPL No.2730 of 2018




03.   02.05.2018            Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
                   counsel for the State.
                            The petitioner is an accused in G.R. Case No.292 of
                   2013 on the file of learned J.M.F.C.(R), Cuttack charge-
                   sheeted under Sections 420/467/468/34, I.P.C. read with
                   Sections 4, 5 and 6 of the Prize Chits and Money Circulation
                   Scheme (Banning) Act, 1978.
                            It is alleged that the present petitioner collected
                   money from the local persons to be deposited in one
                   company in the name and style of M/s. SEDIL India in its
                   branch at Niali market. Subsequently, the depositors found
                   out that they have been cheated for which they lodged the
                   F.I.R.
                            It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that in the
                   meantime, two co-accused persons, namely, Dillip Kumar
                   Padhi and Bibeka Nayak faced trial and have been acquitted
                   by the judgment dated 06.01.2017. It is further submitted
                   that taking into consideration the said judgment of acquittal
                   five co-accused persons have already been granted with
                   anticipatory bail by this Court in different bail application.
                   The anticipatory bail application of the petitioner having
                   been rejected he has surrendered before the learned courts
                   below on 17.04.2018 as directed by this Court and his bail
                   application has been rejected by both the courts below.
                                             2




                          Copy of the bail orders and the copy of the acquittal
                   judgment are placed before the Court.
                          Considering the submissions and the materials placed
                   before the Court, it is directed that let the petitioner be
                   released on bail by furnishing bond of Rs.50,000/-(rupees
                   fifty thousand) with two sureties for the like amount to the
                   satisfaction of the learned J.M.F.C.(R), Cuttack in the
                   aforesaid case with further conditions that he shall not
                   tamper with the prosecution evidence in any manner
                   whatsoever and shall not default in personal attendance of
                   the court during trial on each date.
                          The Bail Application is accordingly disposed of.
                          Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on
                   proper application.
                                                               ....................
                                                                J.P. Das, J.

I.A. No.463 of 2018

04. 02.05.2018 In view of the above order passed in BLAPL No.2730 of 2018, the Interim application stands disposed of.

.................... J.P. Das, J.

JB