Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Supriya Chandrakiran Salvi Alias ... vs The State Of Maharashtra Through Its ... on 1 November, 2023

Author: Mangesh S. Patil

Bench: Mangesh S. Patil

2023:BHC-AUG:23652-DB

                                                      1                        WP / 12213 / 2023


                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                     BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                       913 WRIT PETITION NO.12213 OF 2023

                     SUPRIYA CHANDRAKIRAN SALVI ALIAS SUPRIYA JITENDRA DHAWDE
                                             VERSUS
                   THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS

                                                         ...
                             Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Latange Vijay Prabhakarrao
                          AGP for the respondent - State : Mr. S.R. Yadav - Lonikar
                                                    ...

                                               CORAM      : MANGESH S. PATIL &
                                                            NEERAJ P. DHOTE, JJ.
                                               DATE       : 01 NOVEMBER 2023

              PC :

Heard learned advocate for the petitioner as also the learned AGP.

2. Leave granted to correct the nomenclature of the respondent no. 2 as Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Pune.

3. Learned AGP waives service for respondents no. 1 and 2.

4. The petitioner is challenging the order passed by respondent no. 2 refusing to exercise the power under clause 26.4 of the Secondary School Code, 1977 and thereby refusing to sanction correction of the school record only on the ground that she had left the school.

::: Uploaded on - 02/11/2023 ::: Downloaded on - 02/11/2023 16:25:33 :::

2 WP / 12213 / 2023

5. In the light of the decision in the matter of Janabai d/o. Himmatrao Thakur Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors.; 2019 (6) Mh.L.J. 769, merely because a pupil leaves the school, the Education Officer is not denuded of his powers under clause 26.4 in an appropriate case.

6. The impugned order refusing to exercise the powers only on the ground of petitioner having left the school would not be sustainable and the Education Officer would be guided by the decision in the matter of Janabai (supra).

7. Writ petition is partly allowed.

8. The impugned order is quashed and set aside. Respondent no. 2 shall take a fresh decision on its own merits and in the light of the decision in the matter of Janabai (supra). The decision shall be taken as expeditiously as possible and in any case within four weeks.




     [ NEERAJ P. DHOTE ]                            [ MANGESH S. PATIL ]
           JUDGE                                          JUDGE

arp/




 ::: Uploaded on - 02/11/2023                       ::: Downloaded on - 02/11/2023 16:25:33 :::