Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 11, Cited by 0]

Jharkhand High Court

Banarshi Bhuiyan And Ors vs The State Of Jharkahnd on 7 January, 2015

Author: D. N. Upadhyay

Bench: D. N. Upadhyay

               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                             B. A. No.7275 of 2014
               1. Banarshi Bhuiyan.
               2. Lalan Bhuiyan.
               3. Mani Bhuiyan.                    .......... Petitioners.
                                    ­Versus­
            The State of Jharkhand.                .......... Opposite Party.
                                      ­­­­­­
               CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D. N. UPADHYAY
                                      ­­­­­­
            For the Petitioners :     Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate
            For the State       :     A.P.P.
                                      ­­­­­­
04/07.01.2015

: Heard learned counsel for the parties. 

The   petitioners   are   accused   in   connection   with   Sadar  (Town) P.S. Case No.209 of 2014, corresponding to G.R. No.919 of  2014, registered under Sections 147148149341323324325326307353 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the  court   of   learned   Chief   Judicial   Magistrate,   Palamau   at  Daltonganj. 

It reveals from the first information report that the accused  persons,   who   are   named   in   the   first   information   report,   along  with their associates, who were 30­35 in numbers, made attack  on the policy party, while they were returning after executing a  decree   in   favour   of   decree   holder.   In   the   incident,   six   police  personnel   had   sustained   injuries.   The   accused   persons   were  armed with Lathi, Tangi etc.  It is submitted that three accused persons, who are also  named  in the first information report, have been granted bail by  this   Court   vide   B.A.   No.6610   of   2014.   There   is   no   specific  allegation   against   any   of   the   petitioners   as   alleged.   The  petitioners have remained in custody for more than six months.   

 Counsel for the State has opposed the petitioners' prayer  for bail. 

­2­  Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the  period of detention of the petitioners in jail custody and grant of  bail to other co­accused, the petitioners above named are also  directed   to   be   released   on   bail   on   furnishing   bail   bond   of  Rs.10,000/­ (rupees ten thousand), each, with two sureties of the  like amount, each, to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial  Magistrate, Palamau at Daltonganj, in connection with   Sadar  (Town) P.S. Case No.209 of 2014, corresponding to G.R. No.919 of  2014.

(D. N. Upadhyay, J.) Sanjay/