Kerala High Court
Suresh.R vs The Kerala State Vanitha Commission on 2 December, 2022
Author: Shaji P.Chaly
Bench: Shaji P.Chaly
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
FRIDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF DECEMBER 2022 / 11TH AGRAHAYANA,
1944
WP(C) NO. 30492 OF 2013
PETITIONER/S:
SURESH.R
AGED 49 YEARS
S/O.RAGHAVAN,CHARUVILA VEDU,PARACODE
P.O,ADOOR,PATHANAMTHITTA WORKING AS ASSISTANT
PROFESSOR OF MATHEMATICS,COLLEGE OF
ENGINEERING,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 16
BY ADVS.
SRI.SASTHAMANGALAM S. AJITHKUMAR
SRI.V.S.THOSHIN
RESPONDENT/S:
1 THE KERALA STATE VANITHA COMMISSION
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,OFFICE OF THE KERALA
STATE VANITHA COMMISSION,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM NEAR
LOURED CHURCH,PMG PATTOM P.O,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
695 004
2 THE PRINCIPAL
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 016
3 THE DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION
OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL
EDUCATION,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 013
4 THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
MEDICAL COLLEGE POLICE STATION,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
695 011
5 MRS. SAFIYA BEEVI
ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR IN MATHEMATIC,COLLEGE OF
ENGINEERING,THIRUVANATHAPURAM 695 016
BY ADVS.
SRI.P.S.APPU
SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON
SRI. JOBY JOSEPH, SR. GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 02.12.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W. P. (C) No. 30492 of 2013
-2-
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking the following relief:-
"To pass a writ of certiorari to quash the proceedings Exhibit P6 dated 25/11/13 in P2/1716/TVM/2013 in the interest of justice."
2. Petitioner was aggrieved by an order issued by the Kerala Vanitha Commission, Thiruvananthapuram. The matter was pending before this Court from 11.12.2013 without securing any interim orders.
3. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner Sri. Sasthamangalam S. Ajithkumar, learned Senior Government Pleader Sri. Joby Joseph and learned counsel Sri. T. C. Suresh Menon for the party respondent Ms. Safiya Beevi, Associate Professor in Mathematics, College of Engineering, Thiruvananthapuram and perused the pleadings and material on record.
Nine years have elapsed from the filing of the writ petition before this Court. Since there was no stay granted, one cannot legally W. P. (C) No. 30492 of 2013 -3- presume and visualize that anything survives to be adjudicated in the writ petition with respect to a notice issued by the Kerala Vanitha Commission for appearance of the petitioner.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
SHAJI P. CHALY JUDGE Eb ///TRUE COPY/// P. A. TO JUDGE