Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur
Urn: Saw / 590U / 2023Satya Prakash Saini ... vs Manish Kumar Aloria S/O, Shri Kailash ... on 21 May, 2026
[2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.256/2023
1. Narendra Saini S/o Bharat Singh Saini, Aged About 30
Years, R/o Swami Dayanand Nagar, Ward No. 4, Tijara,
District Alwar, Rajasthan.
2. Dashrath Singh S/o Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 30 Years,
R/o 53/151, Badrinath Colony, Sagar Road, Amer, Jaipur
(Raj.).
3. Bhupendra Singh S/o Om Prakash, Aged About 29 Years,
R/o Vpo Bachhrain, Tehsil Weir, District Bharatpur,
Rajasthan.
4. Pankaj Kumar S/o Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 29 Years,
R/o Bhootoli, District Bharatpur - 321642.
----Appellants
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of
Transport, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, (Rssb), Through Its
Secretary, State Agriculture Management Institution
Campus, Durgapura, Jaipur.
3. The Principal Secretary, To Government, Department Of
Personal, Main Building, Secretariat, Jaipur.
4. Manish Kumar Aloria S/o Shri Kailash Chand Aloria,
Resident Of Samod, Jaipur.
5. Ramkesh Choudhary S/o Shri Shyoji Lal Choudhary,
Resident Of In Front Of Bade Hospital, Nainwa, Bundi.
6. Virendra Singh S/o Shri Balveer Singh Gurjar, Resident Of
Jagdishpura, Karauli, Rajasthan.
7. Hansraj Sidh S/o Shri Bhagwan Nath Sidh, Resident Of
Sidho Ka Bass, Vpo Benisar, Tehsil Shridungargarh,
Bikaner.
8. Samaksh Bhardwaj S/o Shri Ramavtar Bhardwaj, Resident
Of Plot No. 30-A, Pratap Nagar, Old Ramgarh Mod, Jaipur.
9. Manjeet Singh S/o Shri Harphool Singh, Resident Of Ward
No. 13, Jhunjhunu.
10. Yudhishthar S/o Shri Devendra Kumar, Resident Of House
No. 133, Meghwala Pada, Dabla, Jaisalmer.
(Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM)
(Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM)
[2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (2 of 84) [SAW-256/2023]
11. Mohammad Aasif S/o Abdul Rseed, Resident Of B-971,
Bhatta Basti, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur.
12. Sunil Kumar S/o Shri Mahendra Singh, Dabri,
Hanumangarh, Rajasthan.
13. Khagesh Sharma S/o Shri Surendra Kumar Sharma,
Resident Of Arya Samaj Gali, Deeg, Bharatpur.
14. Ram Lal S/o Shri Prem Das, Resident Of 2 Bpsm,
Ganganagar, Rajasthan.
15. Roshan Kumar S/o Shri Kashi Ram, Resident Of Manpura
Bas, Bhalau Teeba, Bhalau Tal, Churu.
16. Lalit Jangid S/o Shri Shishpal Jangid, Resident Of
Navadera Chourya, Ratanpur Road, Dungarpur, Rajasthan.
17. Magram Poonar S/o Shri Tikku Ram Poonar, Resident Of B-
106, Shankar Nagar, Jhawar Road, Jodhpur.
18. Ravin Shekhawat S/o Shri Padam Singh, R/o Karni Colony,
Ajeetgarh, Tehsil Srimadhopur, District Sikar, Rajasthan-
332701.
19. Bharat Bhusan Pandey S/o Suresh Chand Pandey, Aged
About 34 Years, R/o 588A, Sukya Nagar, Gopalpura
Byepass, Jaipur, (Raj.).
20. Prahlad Singh Achara Son Of Shri Phool Singh Achara,
Aged about 25 years, Resident Of Village And Post
Shahpura, Thikariya, District Sikar, Rajasthan (Roll No.
406926).
21. Naresh Kumar Son Of Shri Kishana Ram, Aged About 28
Years, Resident Of Village And Post Daudsor, Tehsil
Didwana, District Nagaur (Rajasthan) (Roll No. 402192)
22. Krishna Pal Singh Rathore Son Of Shri Narendra Singh
Rathore, Aged about 27 years, Resident Of 197,
Bemlavaya, Kuradabad Kuraear, Kurawar Girwa, District
Udaipur (Roll No. 505553).
----Respondents
Connected With D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 228/2023
1. Manoj Sharma S/o Murari Lal Sharma, Aged About 34 Years, R/o 59 A, Shivaji Nagar, Near Jai Sharda School, Sector-71, Shyopur, Pratap Nagar, Jaipur 302033 (Raj.).
2. Udit Kumar Sharma S/o Anil Kumar Sharma, Aged About (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (3 of 84) [SAW-256/2023] 25 Years, R/o Mansarover Colony, Behind Naveen Bus Stand, Rajgarh, Alwar 301408 (Raj.).
3. Akhilesh Paliwal S/o Narendra Kumar, Aged About 33 Years, R/o 3/ma/ 516, Indira Gandhi Nagar, Jagatpura, District Jaipur - 302017.
4. Naresh Kumawat S/o Laxminarayan, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Near Kedia Guest House, Ward No. 15/6, Chirwa, Distt. Jhunjhunu (Raj.).
5. Jeetendra Sharma S/o Hardayal Sharma, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Krishi Nagar, Toll Tax, Sanganer, Jaipur 302033 (Raj.).
6. Ram Naresh S/o Rampal Jakhar, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Opposite Of Sdm Office, Bhoplagarh, Tehsil Bhopalgarh, Distt. Jodhpur (Raj.).
7. Vikas Yadav S/o Kailash Chand Yadav, Aged About 26 Years, R/o 163/29 Pratap Nagar, Sanganer, Distt. Jaipur (Raj.).
8. Keshav Kumar Meena S/o Rajendra Kumar Meena, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Naharkhora, Post Dainda Badedi, Sikari, Distt. Dausa, Rajasthan - 303502.
9. Ashish Agarwal S/o Kailash Chand Goyal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o House No. 5, Prem Mandir Colony, Bajariya, Distt. Sawaimadhopur 322001 (Raj.).
10. Ankit Punia S/o Chandgi Ram Punia, Aged About 25 Years, R/o 229-A, Ganni Colony, Distt. Jhunjhunu 333001 (Raj.).
11. Mahesh Chand Meena S/o Omprakash Meena, Aged About 28 Years, R/o 55, Patel Nagar, Ranthambhore Road, Distt. Sawaimadhopur 322001 (Raj.).
12. Kana Ram S/o Harikaran Ram, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village Harnawa Patty, Tehsil-Parbatsar, Distt. Nagaur (Raj.).
13. Lalit Jyani S/o Ramdeen Jyani, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 52-A, Civil Airport Road, Pabapura, Distt. Jodhpur - 342001 (Raj.).
14. Shailendra Kumar Meena S/o Ramji Lal Meena, Aged About 35 Years, R/o 4/b, Moti Nagar, Bandikui, Distt. Dausa - 303313 (Raj.).
15. Mahesh Meghwal S/o Chunni Lal, Aged About 32 Years, (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (4 of 84) [SAW-256/2023] R/o Village And Post Rani Station, Pratap Bazar, Subhash Nagar, Distt. Pali 306115 (Raj.).
16. Akshay Joshi S/o Kamal Nayan Joshi, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Opp. Govt. Girls School, Govt. Hospital Road, Makrana, Distt. Nagaur-341505 (Raj.).
17. Ravi Saraswat S/o Madan Mohan Saraswat, Aged About 31 Years, R/o 53, Bohro Ka Bass, Village And Post Muhana, Tehsil Sanganer, Distt. Jaipur-302029 (Raj.).
18. Pradeep Thinger S/o Shankar Lal Thinger, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Near Gren View Thinger Niwas, Mount Abu, Distt. Sirohi 307501 (Raj.).
19. Vivek Kumar Sharma S/o Vasudev Sharma, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village And Post Mocha, Tehsil Wazirpur, Distt. Sawaimadhopur - 322205 (Raj.).
20. Ved Prakash S/o Girraj Prasad, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Village And Post Ghansoli, Tehsil-Kishangarh Bas, Distt. Alwar - 301405 (Raj.).
21. Prahlad Singh Achara S/o Phool Singh Achara, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village And Post Shahpura, Thikariya, Tehsil Khandela, Distt. Sikar - 332411 (Raj.).
22. Rajesh Kumar S/o Roor Mal Meena, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 128, Shyam Nagar, Near Nadi Ka Phatak, Benar Road, Jhothwara, Distt. Jaipur - 302012 (Raj.).
23. Yogender Singh S/o Vijay Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village-9 Ptd (B), Post Mokhamwala, Tehsil Raisingh Nagar, Distt. Shriganagar-335051 (Raj.).
24. Ajay Pal Singh S/o Heera Singh, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 384, Krishna Nagar, Bharatpur-321001 (Raj.).
25. Anil Kumar Meghwal S/o Bhanwar Lal Meghwal, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Gatod Sarada, Ghatod, Distt. Udaipur-13905 (Raj.).
26. Dharmendra Meena S/o Shivram Meena, Aged About 26 Years, R/o House No. 22 Gali No. 2, New Kesari Colony, Balupura Road, Adarsh Nagar, Distt. Ajmer-305001 (Raj.).
27. Bharat Kumar Sen S/o Devi Lal, Aged About 31 Years, R/o 189, Dagalmand Lakadwas, Girva, Distt. Udaipur - 313001 (Raj.).
28. Krishna Pal Singh Rathore S/o Narendra Singh Rathore, (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (5 of 84) [SAW-256/2023] Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Bemla, Post Bemla, Tehsil-Girwar, Distt. Udaipur-313002 (Raj.).
29. Bharat Bansal S/o Sunil Bansa, Aged About 25 Years, R/o 2/18, Rhb Colony, Sector-9, Saweena, (Rural) Distt. Udaipur - 313002 (Raj.).
30. Pradeep Singh Shekhawat S/o Ramesh Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o 4/48, Vivekanand Nagar, Near Meera Mandir, Kala Kuan, Distt. Alwar-301001 (Raj.).
31. Satyapal S/o Deva Ram, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Budharri Hudon Ki Dhani, Neembal Kot, Barmer - 344033 (Raj.).
32. Trilok Jangid S/o Lokmani Jangid, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Village Malootana, Thanagazi, Distt. Alwar (Raj.)
33. Arvind Singh S/o Kan Singh Rathore, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 52-A, Laxmi Nagar-A, Niwaru Road, Jhotwara, Distt. Jaipur 302012 (Raj.).
34. Sunita Choudhary S/o Gopal Krishan Choudhary, Aged About 26 Years, R/o 3/83 Panchsheel Enclave, Makdawali Road, Distt. Ajmer-305001 (Raj.).
35. Manish Kumar S/o Ranveer Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Budaniya, Distt. Jhunjhunu - 333025 (Raj.).
36. Pooja Chaudhary D/o Bhanwar Lal Chaudhary, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Bawari, Post Rasidpura, Tehsil - Didwana, Distt. Nagaur - 341517 (Raj.).
37. Jaipal Singh S/o Phool Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Pehal, Tehsil - Mundawar, Distt. Alwar-301404 (Raj.).
38. Saurabh Singh S/o Sanjay Kumar, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Village And Post Pathena, Tehsil, Distt. Bharatpur (Raj.).
39. Narendra Saini S/o Bharat Singh Saini, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Swami Dayanand Nagar, Ward No. 4, Tijara, District Alwar, Rajasthan.
40. Dashrath Singh S/o Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o 53/151, Badrinath Colony, Sagar Road, Amer, Jaipur (Raj.).
41. Bhupendra Singh S/o Om Prakash, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Vpo Bachhrain, Tehsil Weir, District Bharatpur, (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (6 of 84) [SAW-256/2023] Rajasthan.
42. Pankaj Kumar S/o Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Bhootoli, District Bharatpur - 321642.
----Appellants Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Transport, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.).
2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board (Rssb), Through Its Secretary, State Agriculture Management Institution Campus, Durgapura, Jaipur.
3. Tanuj Sharma S/o Shri Gajendra Kumar Sharma, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Near Gopal Talkies Civil Line, Alwar - 301001.
----Respondents D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 230/2023
1. Manoj Sharma S/o Murari Lal Sharma, Aged About 34 Years, R/o 59 A, Shivaji Nagar, Near Jai Sharda School, Sector-71, Shyopur, Pratap Nagar, Jaipur 302033 (Raj.).
2. Udit Kumar Sharma S/o Anil Kumar Sharma, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Mansarover Colony, Behind Naveen Bus Stand, Rajgarh, Alwar 301408 (Raj.).
3. Akhilesh Paliwal S/o Narendra Kumar, Aged About 33 Years, R/o 3/ma/ 516, Indira Gandhi Nagar, Jagatpura, District Jaipur - 302017.
4. Naresh Kumawat S/o Laxminarayan, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Near Kedia Guest House, Ward No. 15/6, Chirwa, Distt. Jhunjhunu (Raj.).
5. Jeetendra Sharma S/o Hardayal Sharma, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Krishi Nagar, Toll Tax, Sanganer, Jaipur 302033 (Raj.).
6. Ram Naresh S/o Rampal Jakhar, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Opposite Of Sdm Office, Bhoplagarh, Tehsil Bhopalgarh, Distt. Jodhpur (Raj.).
7. Vikas Yadav S/o Kailash Chand Yadav, Aged About 26 Years, R/o 163/29 Pratap Nagar, Sanganer, Distt. Jaipur (Raj.).
8. Keshav Kumar Meena S/o Rajendra Kumar Meena, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Naharkhora, Post Dainda (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (7 of 84) [SAW-256/2023] Badedi, Sikari, Distt. Dausa, Rajasthan - 303502.
9. Ashish Agarwal S/o Kailash Chand Goyal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o House No. 5, Prem Mandir Colony, Bajariya, Distt. Sawaimadhopur 322001 (Raj.).
10. Ankit Punia S/o Chandgi Ram Punia, Aged About 25 Years, R/o 229-A, Ganni Colony, Distt. Jhunjhunu 333001 (Raj.).
11. Mahesh Chand Meena S/o Omprakash Meena, Aged About 28 Years, R/o 55, Patel Nagar, Ranthambhore Road, Distt. Sawaimadhopur 322001 (Raj.).
12. Kana Ram S/o Harikaran Ram, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village Harnawa Patty, Tehsil-Parbatsar, Distt. Nagaur (Raj.).
13. Lalit Jyani S/o Ramdeen Jyani, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 52-A, Civil Airport Road, Pabapura, Distt. Jodhpur - 342001 (Raj.).
14. Shailendra Kumar Meena S/o Ramji Lal Meena, Aged About 35 Years, R/o 4/b, Moti Nagar, Bandikui, Distt. Dausa - 303313 (Raj.).
15. Mahesh Meghwal S/o Chunni Lal, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village And Post Rani Station, Pratap Bazar, Subhash Nagar, Distt. Pali 306115 (Raj.).
16. Akshay Joshi S/o Kamal Nayan Joshi, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Opp. Govt. Girls School, Govt. Hospital Road, Makrana, Distt. Nagaur-341505 (Raj.).
17. Ravi Saraswat S/o Madan Mohan Saraswat, Aged About 31 Years, R/o 53, Bohro Ka Bass, Village And Post Muhana, Tehsil Sanganer, Distt. Jaipur-302029 (Raj.).
18. Pradeep Thinger S/o Shankar Lal Thinger, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Near Gren View Thinger Niwas, Mount Abu, Distt. Sirohi 307501 (Raj.).
19. Vivek Kumar Sharma S/o Vasudev Sharma, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village And Post Mocha, Tehsil Wazirpur, Distt. Sawaimadhopur - 322205 (Raj.).
20. Ved Prakash S/o Girraj Prasad, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Village And Post Ghansoli, Tehsil-Kishangarh Bas, Distt. Alwar - 301405 (Raj.).
21. Prahlad Singh Achara S/o Phool Singh Achara, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village And Post Shahpura, Thikariya, Tehsil (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (8 of 84) [SAW-256/2023] Khandela, Distt. Sikar - 332411 (Raj.).
22. Rajesh Kumar S/o Roor Mal Meena, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 128, Shyam Nagar, Near Nadi Ka Phatak, Benar Road, Jhothwara, Distt. Jaipur - 302012 (Raj.).
23. Yogender Singh S/o Vijay Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village-9 Ptd (B), Post Mokhamwala, Tehsil Raisingh Nagar, Distt. Shriganagar-335051 (Raj.).
24. Ajay Pal Singh S/o Heera Singh, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 384, Krishna Nagar, Bharatpur-321001 (Raj.).
25. Anil Kumar Meghwal S/o Bhanwar Lal Meghwal, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Gatod Sarada, Ghatod, Distt. Udaipur
-13905 (Raj.).
26. Dharmendra Meena S/o Shivram Meena, Aged About 26 Years, R/o House No. 22 Gali No. 2, New Kesari Colony, Balupura Road, Adarsh Nagar, Distt. Ajmer-305001 (Raj.).
27. Bharat Kumar Sen S/o Devi Lal, Aged About 31 Years, R/o 189, Dagalmand Lakadwas, Girva, Distt. Udaipur - 313001 (Raj.).
28. Krishna Pal Singh Rathore S/o Narendra Singh Rathore, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Bemla, Post Bemla, Tehsil-Girwar, Distt. Udaipur-313002 (Raj.).
29. Bharat Bansal S/o Sunil Bansal, Aged About 25 Years, R/o 2/18, Rhb Colony, Sector-9, Saweena, (Rural) Distt. Udaipur - 313002 (Raj.).
30. Pradeep Singh Shekhawat S/o Ramesh Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o 4/48, Vivekanand Nagar, Near Meera Mandir, Kala Kuan, Distt. Alwar-301001 (Raj.).
31. Satyapal S/o Deva Ram, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Budharri Hudon Ki Dhani, Neembal Kot, Barmer - 344033 (Raj.).
32. Trilok Jangid S/o Lokmani Jangid, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Village Malootana, Thanagazi, Distt. Alwar (Raj.)
33. Arvind Singh S/o Kan Singh Rathore, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 52-A, Laxmi Nagar-A, Niwaru Road, Jhotwara, Distt. Jaipur 302012 (Raj.).
34. Sunita Choudhary S/o Gopal Krishan Choudhary, Aged About 26 Years, R/o 3/83 Panchsheel Enclave, Makdawali Road, Distt. Ajmer-305001 (Raj.).
(Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (9 of 84) [SAW-256/2023]
35. Manish Kumar S/o Ranveer Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Budaniya, Distt. Jhunjhunu - 333025 (Raj.).
36. Pooja Chaudhary D/o Bhanwar Lal Chaudhary, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Bawari, Post Rasidpura, Tehsil - Didwana, Distt. Nagaur - 341517 (Raj.).
37. Jaipal Singh S/o Phool Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Pehal, Tehsil - Mundawar, Distt. Alwar-301404 (Raj.).
38. Saurabh Singh S/o Sanjay Kumar, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Village And Post Pathena, Tehsil, Distt. Bharatpur (Raj.).
----Appellants Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Transport, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, (Rssb), Through Its Secretary, State Agriculture Management Institution Campus, Durgapura, Jaipur.
3. The Principal Secretary, To Government, Department Of Personal, Main Building, Secretariat, Jaipur.
4. Manish Kumar Aloria S/o Shri Kailash Chand Aloria, Resident Of Samod, Jaipur.
5. Ramkesh Choudhary S/o Shri Shyoji Lal Choudhary, Resident Of In Front Of Bade Hospital, Nainwa, Bundi.
6. Virendra Singh S/o Shri Balveer Singh Gurjar, Resident Of Jagdishpura, Karauli, Rajasthan.
7. Hansraj Sidh S/o Shri Bhagwan Nath Sidh, Resident Of Sidho Ka Bass, Vpo Benisar, Tehsil Shridungargarh, Bikaner.
8. Samaksh Bhardwaj S/o Shri Ramavtar Bhardwaj, Resident Of Plot No. 30-A, Pratap Nagar, Old Ramgarh Mod, Jaipur.
9. Manjeet Singh S/o Shri Harphool Singh, Resident Of Ward No. 13, Jhunjhunu.
10. Yudhishthar S/o Shri Devendra Kumar, Resident Of House No. 133, Meghwala Pada, Dabla, Jaisalmer.
11. Mohammad Aasif S/o Abdul Rseed, Resident Of B-971, Bhatta Basti, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur.
(Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (10 of 84) [SAW-256/2023]
12. Sunil Kumar S/o Shri Mahendra Singh, Dabri, Hanumangarh, Rajasthan.
13. Khagesh Sharma S/o Shri Surendra Kumar Sharma, Resident Of Arya Samaj Gali, Deeg, Bharatpur.
14. Ram Lal S/o Shri Prem Das, Resident Of 2 Bpsm, Ganganagar, Rajasthan.
15. Roshan Kumar S/o Shri Kashi Ram, Resident Of Manpura Bas, Bhalau Teeba, Bhalau Tal, Churu.
16. Lalit Jangid S/o Shri Shishpal Jangid, Resident Of Navadera Chourya, Ratanpur Road, Dungarpur, Rajasthan.
17. Magram Poonar S/o Shri Tikku Ram Poonar, Resident Of B-
106, Shankar Nagar, Jhawar Road, Jodhpur.
18. Ravin Shekhawat S/o Shri Padam Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Karni Colony, Ajeetgarh, Tehsil Srimadhopur, District Sikar, Rajasthan- 332701.
19. Narendra Saini S/o Bharat Singh Saini, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Swami Dayanand Nagar, Ward No. 4, Tijara, District Alwar, Rajasthan.
20. Bharat Bhusan Pandey S/o Suresh Chand Pandey, Aged About 34 Years, R/o 588A, Sukya Nagar, Gopalpura Byepass, Jaipur, (Raj.).
21. Dashrath Singh S/o Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o 53/151, Badrinath Colony, Sagar Road, Amer, Jaipur (Raj.).
22. Bhupendra Singh S/o Om Prakash, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Vpo Bachhrain, Tehsil Weir, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan.
23. Pankaj Kumar S/o Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Bhootoli, District Bharatpur - 321642.
24. Prahlad Singh Achara Son Of Shri Phool Singh Achara, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Shahpura, Thikariya, District Sikar, Rajasthan (Roll No. 406926).
25. Naresh Kumar Son Of Shri Kishana Ram, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Daudsor, Tehsil Didwana, District Nagaur (Rajasthan) (Roll No. 402192)
26. Krishna Pal Singh Rathore Son Of Shri Narendra Singh Rathore, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of 197, (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (11 of 84) [SAW-256/2023] Bemlavaya, Kuradabad Kuraear, Kurawar Girwa, District Udaipur (Roll No. 505553).
----Respondents D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 236/2023
1. Manoj Sharma S/o Murari Lal Sharma, Aged About 34 Years, R/o 59 A, Shivaji Nagar, Near Jai Sharda School, Sector-71, Shyopur, Pratap Nagar, Jaipur 302033 (Raj.).
2. Udit Kumar Sharma S/o Anil Kumar Sharma, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Mansarover Colony, Behind Naveen Bus Stand, Rajgarh, Alwar 301408 (Raj.).
3. Akhilesh Paliwal S/o Narendra Kumar, Aged About 33 Years, R/o 3/ma/ 516, Indira Gandhi Nagar, Jagatpura, District Jaipur - 302017.
4. Naresh Kumawat S/o Laxminarayan, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Near Kedia Guest House, Ward No. 15/6, Chirwa, Distt. Jhunjhunu (Raj.).
5. Jeetendra Sharma S/o Hardayal Sharma, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Krishi Nagar, Toll Tax, Sanganer, Jaipur 302033 (Raj.).
6. Ram Naresh S/o Rampal Jakhar, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Opposite Of Sdm Office, Bhoplagarh, Tehsil Bhopalgarh, Distt. Jodhpur (Raj.).
7. Vikas Yadav S/o Kailash Chand Yadav, Aged About 26 Years, R/o 163/29 Pratap Nagar, Sanganer, Distt. Jaipur (Raj.).
8. Keshav Kumar Meena S/o Rajendra Kumar Meena, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Naharkhora, Post Dainda Badedi, Sikari, Distt. Dausa, Rajasthan - 303502.
9. Ashish Agarwal S/o Kailash Chand Goyal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o House No. 5, Prem Mandir Colony, Bajariya, Distt. Sawaimadhopur 322001 (Raj.).
10. Ankit Punia S/o Chandgi Ram Punia, Aged About 25 Years, R/o 229-A, Ganni Colony, Distt. Jhunjhunu 333001 (Raj.).
11. Mahesh Chand Meena S/o Omprakash Meena, Aged About 28 Years, R/o 55, Patel Nagar, Ranthambhore Road, Distt. Sawaimadhopur 322001 (Raj.).
12. Kana Ram S/o Harikaran Ram, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village Harnawa Patty, Tehsil-Parbatsar, Distt. Nagaur (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (12 of 84) [SAW-256/2023] (Raj.).
13. Lalit Jyani S/o Ramdeen Jyani, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 52-A, Civil Airport Road, Pabapura, Distt. Jodhpur - 342001 (Raj.).
14. Shailendra Kumar Meena S/o Ramji Lal Meena, Aged About 35 Years, R/o 4/b, Moti Nagar, Bandikui, Distt. Dausa - 303313 (Raj.).
15. Mahesh Meghwal S/o Chunni Lal, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village And Post Rani Station, Pratap Bazar, Subhash Nagar, Distt. Pali 306115 (Raj.).
16. Akshay Joshi S/o Kamal Nayan Joshi, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Opp. Govt. Girls School, Govt. Hospital Road, Makrana, Distt. Nagaur-341505 (Raj.).
17. Ravi Saraswat S/o Madan Mohan Saraswat, Aged About 31 Years, R/o 53, Bohro Ka Bass, Village And Post Muhana, Tehsil Sanganer, Distt. Jaipur-302029 (Raj.).
18. Pradeep Thinger S/o Shankar Lal Thinger, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Near Gren View Thinger Niwas, Mount Abu, Distt. Sirohi 307501 (Raj.).
19. Vivek Kumar Sharma S/o Vasudev Sharma, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village And Post Mocha, Tehsil Wazirpur, Distt. Sawaimadhopur - 322205 (Raj.).
20. Ved Prakash S/o Girraj Prasad, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Village And Post Ghansoli, Tehsil-Kishangarh Bas, Distt. Alwar - 301405 (Raj.).
21. Prahlad Singh Achara S/o Phool Singh Achara, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village And Post Shahpura, Thikariya, Tehsil Khandela, Distt. Sikar - 332411 (Raj.).
22. Rajesh Kumar S/o Roor Mal Meena, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 128, Shyam Nagar, Near Nadi Ka Phatak, Benar Road, Jhothwara, Distt. Jaipur - 302012 (Raj.).
23. Yogender Singh S/o Vijay Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village-9 Ptd (B), Post Mokhamwala, Tehsil Raisingh Nagar, Distt. Shriganagar-335051 (Raj.).
24. Ajay Pal Singh S/o Heera Singh, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 384, Krishna Nagar, Bharatpur-321001 (Raj.).
25. Anil Kumar Meghwal S/o Bhanwar Lal Meghwal, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Gatod Sarada, Ghatod, Distt. Udaipur (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (13 of 84) [SAW-256/2023]
- 13905 (Raj.).
26. Dharmendra Meena S/o Shivram Meena, Aged About 26 Years, R/o House No. 22 Gali No. 2, New Kesari Colony, Balupura Road, Adarsh Nagar, Distt. Ajmer-305001 (Raj.).
27. Bharat Kumar Sen S/o Devi Lal, Aged About 31 Years, R/o 189, Dagalmand Lakadwas, Girva, Distt. Udaipur - 313001 (Raj.).
28. Krishna Pal Singh Rathore S/o Narendra Singh Rathore, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Bemla, Post Bemla, Tehsil-Girwar, Distt. Udaipur-313002 (Raj.).
29. Bharat Bansal S/o Sunil Bansal, Aged About 25 Years, R/o 2/18, Rhb Colony, Sector-9, Saweena, (Rural) Distt. Udaipur - 313002 (Raj.).
30. Pradeep Singh Shekhawat S/o Ramesh Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o 4/48, Vivekanand Nagar, Near Meera Mandir, Kala Kuan, Distt. Alwar-301001 (Raj.).
31. Satyapal S/o Deva Ram, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Budharri Hudon Ki Dhani, Neembal Kot, Barmer - 344033 (Raj.).
32. Trilok Jangid S/o Lokmani Jangid, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Village Malootana, Thanagazi, Distt. Alwar (Raj.)
33. Arvind Singh S/o Kan Singh Rathore, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 52-A, Laxmi Nagar-A, Niwaru Road, Jhotwara, Distt. Jaipur 302012 (Raj.).
34. Sunita Choudhary S/o Gopal Krishan Choudhary, Aged About 26 Years, R/o 3/83 Panchsheel Enclave, Makdawali Road, Distt. Ajmer-305001 (Raj.).
35. Manish Kumar S/o Ranveer Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Budaniya, Distt. Jhunjhunu - 333025 (Raj.).
36. Pooja Chaudhary D/o Bhanwar Lal Chaudhary, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Bawari, Post Rasidpura, Tehsil - Didwana, Distt. Nagaur - 341517 (Raj.).
37. Jaipal Singh S/o Phool Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Pehal, Tehsil - Mundawar, Distt. Alwar-301404 (Raj.).
38. Saurabh Singh S/o Sanjay Kumar, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Village And Post Pathena, Tehsil, Distt. Bharatpur (Raj.).
(Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (14 of 84) [SAW-256/2023]
39. Narendra Saini S/o Bharat Singh Saini, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Swami Dayanand Nagar, Ward No. 4, Tijara, District Alwar, Rajasthan.
40. Dashrath Singh S/o Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o 53/151, Badrinath Colony, Sagar Road, Amer, Jaipur (Raj.).
41. Bhupendra Singh S/o Om Prakash, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Vpo Bachhrain, Tehsil Weir, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan.
42. Pankaj Kumar S/o Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Bhootoli, District Bharatpur - 321642.
----Appellants Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Transport, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.).
2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board (Rssb), Through Its President, State Agriculture Management Institution Campus, Durgapura, Jaipur.
3. Arun Kumar Yadav S/o Shri Ramesh Chand Yadav, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Village Manchal, Tehsil Behror, Alwar, Rajasthan.
----Respondents D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 242/2023
1. Manoj Sharma S/o Murari Lal Sharma, Aged About 34 Years, R/o 59 A, Shivaji Nagar, Near Jai Sharda School, Sector-71, Shyopur, Pratap Nagar, Jaipur 302033 (Raj.).
2. Udit Kumar Sharma S/o Anil Kumar Sharma, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Mansarover Colony, Behind Naveen Bus Stand, Rajgarh, Alwar 301408 (Raj.).
3. Akhilesh Paliwal S/o Narendra Kumar, Aged About 33 Years, R/o 3/ma/ 516, Indira Gandhi Nagar, Jagatpura, District Jaipur - 302017.
4. Naresh Kumawat S/o Laxminarayan, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Near Kedia Guest House, Ward No. 15/6, Chirwa, Distt. Jhunjhunu (Raj.).
5. Jeetendra Sharma S/o Hardayal Sharma, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Krishi Nagar, Toll Tax, Sanganer, Jaipur 302033 (Raj.).
(Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (15 of 84) [SAW-256/2023]
6. Ram Naresh S/o Rampal Jakhar, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Opposite Of Sdm Office, Bhoplagarh, Tehsil Bhopalgarh, Distt. Jodhpur (Raj.).
7. Vikas Yadav S/o Kailash Chand Yadav, Aged About 26 Years, R/o 163/29 Pratap Nagar, Sanganer, Distt. Jaipur (Raj.).
8. Keshav Kumar Meena S/o Rajendra Kumar Meena, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Naharkhora, Post Dainda Badedi, Sikari, Distt. Dausa, Rajasthan - 303502.
9. Ashish Agarwal S/o Kailash Chand Goyal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o House No. 5, Prem Mandir Colony, Bajariya, Distt. Sawaimadhopur 322001 (Raj.).
10. Ankit Punia S/o Chandgi Ram Punia, Aged About 25 Years, R/o 229-A, Ganni Colony, Distt. Jhunjhunu 333001 (Raj.).
11. Mahesh Chand Meena S/o Omprakash Meena, Aged About 28 Years, R/o 55, Patel Nagar, Ranthambhore Road, Distt. Sawaimadhopur 322001 (Raj.).
12. Kana Ram S/o Harikaran Ram, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village Harnawa Patty, Tehsil-Parbatsar, Distt. Nagaur (Raj.).
13. Lalit Jyani S/o Ramdeen Jyani, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 52-A, Civil Airport Road, Pabapura, Distt. Jodhpur - 342001 (Raj.).
14. Shailendra Kumar Meena S/o Ramji Lal Meena, Aged About 35 Years, R/o 4/b, Moti Nagar, Bandikui, Distt. Dausa - 303313 (Raj.).
15. Mahesh Meghwal S/o Chunni Lal, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village And Post Rani Station, Pratap Bazar, Subhash Nagar, Distt. Pali 306115 (Raj.).
16. Akshay Joshi S/o Kamal Nayan Joshi, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Opp. Govt. Girls School, Govt. Hospital Road, Makrana, Distt. Nagaur-341505 (Raj.).
17. Ravi Saraswat S/o Madan Mohan Saraswat, Aged About 31 Years, R/o 53, Bohro Ka Bass, Village And Post Muhana, Tehsil Sanganer, Distt. Jaipur-302029 (Raj.).
18. Pradeep Thinger S/o Shankar Lal Thinger, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Near Gren View Thinger Niwas, Mount Abu, Distt. Sirohi 307501 (Raj.).
(Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (16 of 84) [SAW-256/2023]
19. Vivek Kumar Sharma S/o Vasudev Sharma, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village And Post Mocha, Tehsil Wazirpur, Distt. Sawaimadhopur - 322205 (Raj.).
20. Ved Prakash S/o Girraj Prasad, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Village And Post Ghansoli, Tehsil-Kishangarh Bas, Distt. Alwar - 301405 (Raj.).
21. Prahlad Singh Achara S/o Phool Singh Achara, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village And Post Shahpura, Thikariya, Tehsil Khandela, Distt. Sikar - 332411 (Raj.).
22. Rajesh Kumar S/o Roor Mal Meena, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 128, Shyam Nagar, Near Nadi Ka Phatak, Benar Road, Jhothwara, Distt. Jaipur - 302012 (Raj.).
23. Yogender Singh S/o Vijay Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village-9 Ptd (B), Post Mokhamwala, Tehsil Raisingh Nagar, Distt. Shriganagar-335051 (Raj.).
24. Ajay Pal Singh S/o Heera Singh, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 384, Krishna Nagar, Bharatpur-321001 (Raj.).
25. Anil Kumar Meghwal S/o Bhanwar Lal Meghwal, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Gatod Sarada, Ghatod, Distt. Udaipur
- 13905 (Raj.).
26. Dharmendra Meena S/o Shivram Meena, Aged About 26 Years, R/o House No. 22 Gali No. 2, New Kesari Colony, Balupura Road, Adarsh Nagar, Distt. Ajmer-305001 (Raj.).
27. Bharat Kumar Sen S/o Devi Lal, Aged About 31 Years, R/o 189, Dagalmand Lakadwas, Girva, Distt. Udaipur - 313001 (Raj.).
28. Krishna Pal Singh Rathore S/o Narendra Singh Rathore, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Bemla, Post Bemla, Tehsil-Girwar, Distt. Udaipur-313002 (Raj.).
29. Bharat Bansal S/o Sunil Bansal, Aged About 25 Years, R/o 2/18, Rhb Colony, Sector-9, Saweena, (Rural) Distt. Udaipur - 313002 (Raj.).
30. Pradeep Singh Shekhawat S/o Ramesh Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o 4/48, Vivekanand Nagar, Near Meera Mandir, Kala Kuan, Distt. Alwar-301001 (Raj.).
31. Satyapal S/o Deva Ram, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Budharri Hudon Ki Dhani, Neembal Kot, Barmer - 344033 (Raj.).
(Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (17 of 84) [SAW-256/2023]
32. Trilok Jangid S/o Lokmani Jangid, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Village Malootana, Thanagazi, Distt. Alwar (Raj.)
33. Arvind Singh S/o Kan Singh Rathore, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 52-A, Laxmi Nagar-A, Niwaru Road, Jhotwara, Distt. Jaipur 302012 (Raj.).
34. Sunita Choudhary S/o Gopal Krishan Choudhary, Aged About 26 Years, R/o 3/83 Panchsheel Enclave, Makdawali Road, Distt. Ajmer-305001 (Raj.).
35. Manish Kumar S/o Ranveer Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Budaniya, Distt. Jhunjhunu - 333025 (Raj.).
36. Pooja Chaudhary D/o Bhanwar Lal Chaudhary, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Bawari, Post Rasidpura, Tehsil - Didwana, Distt. Nagaur - 341517 (Raj.).
37. Jaipal Singh S/o Phool Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Pehal, Tehsil - Mundawar, Distt. Alwar-301404 (Raj.).
38. Saurabh Singh S/o Sanjay Kumar, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Village And Post Pathena, Tehsil, Distt. Bharatpur (Raj.).
39. Narendra Saini S/o Bharat Singh Saini, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Swami Dayanand Nagar, Ward No. 4, Tijara, District Alwar, Rajasthan.
40. Dashrath Singh S/o Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o 53/151, Badrinath Colony, Sagar Road, Amer, Jaipur (Raj.).
41. Pankaj Kumar S/o Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Bhootoli, District Bharatpur - 321642.
----Appellants Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Transport Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.).
2. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Transport Commissioner, Parivahan Bhawan, 22 Godown, Jaipur (Raj.).
3. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Chairman, Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.).
4. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.).
(Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (18 of 84) [SAW-256/2023]
5. Rahul Aswal S/o Jagmal Aswal, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Manohparpur, Jaipur, (Raj.)
6. Ajit Saini S/o Mr. Moharpal Saini, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Satna, Malakhera, Alwar, (Raj.)
7. Vipin Meena S/o Bhandu Lal Meena, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Vpo Jandmohalla Jastana, Tehsil Bonli, Sawai Madhopur (Raj.)
8. Prithavi Singh S/o Kishor Singh, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Vpo Dabari Vai Jaswantgarh, Ladnun, District Nagaur, (Raj.)
9. Bhupendra Singh S/o Om Prakash, Aged about 29 years, Resident Of Vpo Bachhren, Tehsil Bhusawar, District Bharatpur Pincode 321407.
----Respondents D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 244/2023
1. Manoj Sharma S/o Murari Lal Sharma, Aged About 34 Years, R/o 59 A, Shivaji Nagar, Near Jai Sharda School, Sector-71, Shyopur, Pratap Nagar, Jaipur 302033 (Raj.).
2. Udit Kumar Sharma S/o Anil Kumar Sharma, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Mansarover Colony, Behind Naveen Bus Stand, Rajgarh, Alwar 301408 (Raj.).
3. Akhilesh Paliwal S/o Narendra Kumar, Aged About 33 Years, R/o 3/ma/ 516, Indira Gandhi Nagar, Jagatpura, District Jaipur - 302017.
4. Naresh Kumawat S/o Laxminarayan, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Near Kedia Guest House, Ward No. 15/6, Chirwa, Distt. Jhunjhunu (Raj.).
5. Jeetendra Sharma S/o Hardayal Sharma, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Krishi Nagar, Toll Tax, Sanganer, Jaipur 302033 (Raj.).
6. Ram Naresh S/o Rampal Jakhar, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Opposite Of Sdm Office, Bhoplagarh, Tehsil Bhopalgarh, Distt. Jodhpur (Raj.).
7. Vikas Yadav S/o Kailash Chand Yadav, Aged About 26 Years, R/o 163/29 Pratap Nagar, Sanganer, Distt. Jaipur (Raj.).
8. Keshav Kumar Meena S/o Rajendra Kumar Meena, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Naharkhora, Post Dainda (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (19 of 84) [SAW-256/2023] Badedi, Sikari, Distt. Dausa, Rajasthan - 303502.
9. Ashish Agarwal S/o Kailash Chand Goyal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o House No. 5, Prem Mandir Colony, Bajariya, Distt. Sawaimadhopur 322001 (Raj.).
10. Ankit Punia S/o Chandgi Ram Punia, Aged About 25 Years, R/o 229-A, Ganni Colony, Distt. Jhunjhunu 333001 (Raj.).
11. Mahesh Chand Meena S/o Omprakash Meena, Aged About 28 Years, R/o 55, Patel Nagar, Ranthambhore Road, Distt. Sawaimadhopur 322001 (Raj.).
12. Kana Ram S/o Harikaran Ram, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village Harnawa Patty, Tehsil-Parbatsar, Distt. Nagaur (Raj.).
13. Lalit Jyani S/o Ramdeen Jyani, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 52-A, Civil Airport Road, Pabapura, Distt. Jodhpur - 342001 (Raj.).
14. Shailendra Kumar Meena S/o Ramji Lal Meena, Aged About 35 Years, R/o 4/b, Moti Nagar, Bandikui, Distt. Dausa - 303313 (Raj.).
15. Mahesh Meghwal S/o Chunni Lal, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village And Post Rani Station, Pratap Bazar, Subhash Nagar, Distt. Pali 306115 (Raj.).
16. Akshay Joshi S/o Kamal Nayan Joshi, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Opp. Govt. Girls School, Govt. Hospital Road, Makrana, Distt. Nagaur-341505 (Raj.).
17. Ravi Saraswat S/o Madan Mohan Saraswat, Aged About 31 Years, R/o 53, Bohro Ka Bass, Village And Post Muhana, Tehsil Sanganer, Distt. Jaipur-302029 (Raj.).
18. Pradeep Thinger S/o Shankar Lal Thinger, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Near Gren View Thinger Niwas, Mount Abu, Distt. Sirohi 307501 (Raj.).
19. Vivek Kumar Sharma S/o Vasudev Sharma, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village And Post Mocha, Tehsil Wazirpur, Distt. Sawaimadhopur - 322205 (Raj.).
20. Ved Prakash S/o Girraj Prasad, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Village And Post Ghansoli, Tehsil-Kishangarh Bas, Distt. Alwar - 301405 (Raj.).
21. Prahlad Singh Achara S/o Phool Singh Achara, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village And Post Shahpura, Thikariya, Tehsil (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (20 of 84) [SAW-256/2023] Khandela, Distt. Sikar - 332411 (Raj.).
22. Rajesh Kumar S/o Roor Mal Meena, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 128, Shyam Nagar, Near Nadi Ka Phatak, Benar Road, Jhothwara, Distt. Jaipur - 302012 (Raj.).
23. Yogender Singh S/o Vijay Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village-9 Ptd (B), Post Mokhamwala, Tehsil Raisingh Nagar, Distt. Shriganagar-335051 (Raj.).
24. Ajay Pal Singh S/o Heera Singh, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 384, Krishna Nagar, Bharatpur-321001 (Raj.).
25. Anil Kumar Meghwal S/o Bhanwar Lal Meghwal, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Gatod Sarada, Ghatod, Distt. Udaipur-13905 (Raj.).
26. Dharmendra Meena S/o Shivram Meena, Aged About 26 Years, R/o House No. 22 Gali No. 2, New Kesari Colony, Balupura Road, Adarsh Nagar, Distt. Ajmer-305001 (Raj.).
27. Bharat Kumar Sen S/o Devi Lal, Aged About 31 Years, R/o 189, Dagalmand Lakadwas, Girva, Distt. Udaipur - 313001 (Raj.).
28. Krishna Pal Singh Rathore S/o Narendra Singh Rathore, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Bemla, Post Bemla, Tehsil-Girwar, Distt. Udaipur-313002 (Raj.).
29. Bharat Bansal S/o Sunil Bansal, Aged About 25 Years, R/o 2/18, Rhb Colony, Sector-9, Saweena, (Rural) Distt. Udaipur - 313002 (Raj.).
30. Pradeep Singh Shekhawat S/o Ramesh Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o 4/48, Vivekanand Nagar, Near Meera Mandir, Kala Kuan, Distt. Alwar-301001 (Raj.).
31. Satyapal S/o Deva Ram, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Budharri Hudon Ki Dhani, Neembal Kot, Barmer - 344033 (Raj.).
32. Trilok Jangid S/o Lokmani Jangid, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Village Malootana, Thanagazi, Distt. Alwar (Raj.)
33. Arvind Singh S/o Kan Singh Rathore, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 52-A, Laxmi Nagar-A, Niwaru Road, Jhotwara, Distt. Jaipur 302012 (Raj.).
34. Sunita Choudhary S/o Gopal Krishan Choudhary, Aged About 26 Years, R/o 3/83 Panchsheel Enclave, Makdawali Road, Distt. Ajmer-305001 (Raj.).
(Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (21 of 84) [SAW-256/2023]
35. Manish Kumar S/o Ranveer Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Budaniya, Distt. Jhunjhunu - 333025 (Raj.).
36. Pooja Chaudhary D/o Bhanwar Lal Chaudhary, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Bawari, Post Rasidpura, Tehsil - Didwana, Distt. Nagaur - 341517 (Raj.).
37. Jaipal Singh S/o Phool Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Pehal, Tehsil - Mundawar, Distt. Alwar-301404 (Raj.).
38. Saurabh Singh S/o Sanjay Kumar, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Village And Post Pathena, Tehsil, Distt. Bharatpur (Raj.).
39. Narendra Saini S/o Bharat Singh Saini, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Swami Dayanand Nagar, Ward No. 4, Tijara, District Alwar, Rajasthan.
40. Dashrath Singh S/o Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o 53/151, Badrinath Colony, Sagar Road, Amer, Jaipur (Raj.).
41. Bhupendra Singh S/o Om Prakash, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Vpo Bachhrain, Tehsil Weir, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan.
42. Pankaj Kumar S/o Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Bhootoli, District Bharatpur - 321642.
----Appellants Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Transport Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, State Agriculture Management Institution Campus, Durgapura, Jaipur.
3. Yogendra Kumar Agarwal S/o Deen Dayal Agarwal, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Old Bayana Bus Stand, Neemda Gate, Bharatpur (Raj.).
4. Laxman Singh Bhati S/o Shiv Singh Bhati, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Flat No. 6156, Block- 40, Rangoli Garden Panchyawala, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.).
5. Tejbhan Singh S/o Rasal Singh, Aged About 35 Years, R/o 54, Near Cimmco Nagla, Tej Singh, Bharatpur (Raj.).
6. Meenakshi Sharma W/o Kamal Kumar Mishra, Aged About (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (22 of 84) [SAW-256/2023] 28 Years, R/o Plot No. A-19, Aravali Vihar, Vivekanand Colony, Dausakhurd, Dausa (Raj.).
----Respondents D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 247/2023
1. Manoj Sharma S/o Murari Lal Sharma, Aged About 34 Years, R/o 59 A, Shivaji Nagar, Near Jai Sharda School, Sector-71, Shyopur, Pratap Nagar, Jaipur 302033 (Raj.).
2. Udit Kumar Sharma S/o Anil Kumar Sharma, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Mansarover Colony, Behind Naveen Bus Stand, Rajgarh, Alwar 301408 (Raj.).
3. Akhilesh Paliwal S/o Narendra Kumar, Aged About 33 Years, R/o 3/ma/ 516, Indira Gandhi Nagar, Jagatpura, District Jaipur - 302017.
4. Naresh Kumawat S/o Laxminarayan, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Near Kedia Guest House, Ward No. 15/6, Chirwa, Distt. Jhunjhunu (Raj.).
5. Jeetendra Sharma S/o Hardayal Sharma, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Krishi Nagar, Toll Tax, Sanganer, Jaipur 302033 (Raj.).
6. Ram Naresh S/o Rampal Jakhar, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Opposite Of Sdm Office, Bhoplagarh, Tehsil Bhopalgarh, Distt. Jodhpur (Raj.).
7. Vikas Yadav S/o Kailash Chand Yadav, Aged About 26 Years, R/o 163/29 Pratap Nagar, Sanganer, Distt. Jaipur (Raj.).
8. Keshav Kumar Meena S/o Rajendra Kumar Meena, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Naharkhora, Post Dainda Badedi, Sikari, Distt. Dausa, Rajasthan - 303502.
9. Ashish Agarwal S/o Kailash Chand Goyal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o House No. 5, Prem Mandir Colony, Bajariya, Distt. Sawaimadhopur 322001 (Raj.).
10. Ankit Punia S/o Chandgi Ram Punia, Aged About 25 Years, R/o 229-A, Ganni Colony, Distt. Jhunjhunu 333001 (Raj.).
11. Mahesh Chand Meena S/o Omprakash Meena, Aged About 28 Years, R/o 55, Patel Nagar, Ranthambhore Road, Distt. Sawaimadhopur 322001 (Raj.).
12. Kana Ram S/o Harikaran Ram, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village Harnawa Patty, Tehsil-Parbatsar, Distt. Nagaur (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (23 of 84) [SAW-256/2023] (Raj.).
13. Lalit Jyani S/o Ramdeen Jyani, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 52-A, Civil Airport Road, Pabapura, Distt. Jodhpur - 342001 (Raj.).
14. Shailendra Kumar Meena S/o Ramji Lal Meena, Aged About 35 Years, R/o 4/b, Moti Nagar, Bandikui, Distt. Dausa - 303313 (Raj.).
15. Mahesh Meghwal S/o Chunni Lal, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Villageand Post Rani Station, Pratap Bazar, Subhash Nagar, Distt. Pali 306115 (Raj.).
16. Akshay Joshi S/o Kamal Nayan Joshi, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Opp. Govt. Girls School, Govt. Hospital Road, Makrana, Distt. Nagaur-341505 (Raj.).
17. Ravi Saraswat S/o Madan Mohan Saraswat, Aged About 31 Years, R/o 53, Bohro Ka Bass, Village And Post Muhana, Tehsil Sanganer, Distt. Jaipur-302029 (Raj.).
18. Pradeep Thinger S/o Shankar Lal Thinger, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Near Gren View Thinger Niwas, Mount Abu, Distt. Sirohi 307501 (Raj.).
19. Vivek Kumar Sharma S/o Vasudev Sharma, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village And Post Mocha, Tehsil Wazirpur, Distt. Sawaimadhopur - 322205 (Raj.).
20. Ved Prakash S/o Girraj Prasad, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Village And Post Ghansoli, Tehsil-Kishangarh Bas, Distt. Alwar - 301405 (Raj.).
21. Prahlad Singh Achara S/o Phool Singh Achara, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village And Post Shahpura, Thikariya, Tehsil Khandela, Distt. Sikar - 332411 (Raj.).
22. Rajesh Kumar S/o Roor Mal Meena, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 128, Shyam Nagar, Near Nadi Ka Phatak, Benar Road, Jhothwara, Distt. Jaipur - 302012 (Raj.).
23. Yogender Singh S/o Vijay Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village-9 Ptd (B), Post Mokhamwala, Tehsil Raisingh Nagar, Distt. Shriganagar-335051 (Raj.).
24. Ajay Pal Singh S/o Heera Singh, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 384, Krishna Nagar, Bharatpur-321001 (Raj.).
25. Anil Kumar Meghwal S/o Bhanwar Lal Meghwal, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Gatod Sarada, Ghatod, Distt.
(Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (24 of 84) [SAW-256/2023] Udaipur-13905 (Raj.).
26. Dharmendra Meena S/o Shivram Meena, Aged About 26 Years, R/o House No. 22 Gali No. 2, New Kesari Colony, Balupura Road, Adarsh Nagar, Distt. Ajmer-305001 (Raj.).
27. Bharat Kumar Sen S/o Devi Lal, Aged About 31 Years, R/o 189, Dagalmand Lakadwas, Girva, Distt. Udaipur - 313001 (Raj.).
28. Krishna Pal Singh Rathore S/o Narendra Singh Rathore, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Bemla, Post Bemla, Tehsil-Girwar, Distt. Udaipur-313002 (Raj.).
29. Bharat Bansal S/o Sunil Bansal, Aged About 25 Years, R/o 2/18, Rhb Colony, Sector-9, Saweena, (Rural) Distt. Udaipur - 313002 (Raj.).
30. Pradeep Singh Shekhawat S/o Ramesh Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o 4/48, Vivekanand Nagar, Near Meera Mandir, Kala Kuan, Distt. Alwar-301001 (Raj.).
31. Satyapal S/o Deva Ram, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Budharri Hudon Ki Dhani, Neembal Kot, Barmer - 344033 (Raj.).
32. Trilok Jangid S/o Lokmani Jangid, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Village Malootana, Thanagazi, Distt. Alwar (Raj.)
33. Arvind Singh S/o Kan Singh Rathore, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 52-A, Laxmi Nagar-A, Niwaru Road, Jhotwara, Distt. Jaipur 302012 (Raj.).
34. Sunita Choudhary S/o Gopal Krishan Choudhary, Aged About 26 Years, R/o 3/83 Panchsheel Enclave, Makdawali Road, Distt. Ajmer-305001 (Raj.).
35. Manish Kumar S/o Ranveer Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Budaniya, Distt. Jhunjhunu - 333025 (Raj.).
36. Pooja Chaudhary D/o Bhanwar Lal Chaudhary, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Bawari, Post Rasidpura, Tehsil - Didwana, Distt. Nagaur - 341517 (Raj.).
37. Jaipal Singh S/o Phool Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Pehal, Tehsil - Mundawar, Distt. Alwar-301404 (Raj.).
38. Saurabh Singh S/o Sanjay Kumar, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Village And Post Pathena, Tehsil, Distt. Bharatpur (Raj.).
(Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (25 of 84) [SAW-256/2023]
39. Narendra Saini S/o Bharat Singh Saini, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Swami Dayanand Nagar, Ward No. 4, Tijara, District Alwar, Rajasthan.
40. Dashrath Singh S/o Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o 53/151, Badrinath Colony, Sagar Road, Amer, Jaipur (Raj.).
41. Bhupendra Singh S/o Om Prakash, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Vpo Bachhrain, Tehsil Weir, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan.
42. Pankaj Kumar S/o Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Bhootoli, District Bharatpur - 321642.
----Appellants Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Transport, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.).
2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board (Rssb), Through Its Secretary, State Agriculture Management Institution Campus, Durgapura, Jaipur.
3. Pradeep Kumar Dixit S/o Shri Ishwari Prasad Dixit, Aged about 41 years, Resident Of Flat G2/ Plot No. 38,dr. Rajendra Prasad Nagar, Badarwaas, Jaipur.
----Respondents D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 251/2023
1. Manish Kumar Avasthi S/o Shri Yogesh Avasthi, Aged About 33 Years, R/o 9-A, Barkat Nagar, Tonk Phatak, Jaipur, Rajasthan (Roll No. 406594)
2. Shailendra Pal Singh S/o Shri Vijay Pal Singh, Aged About 28 Years, R/o A-15, Karni Nagar, Pawan Puri, Bikaner, Rajasthan -334003 (Roll No. 407526)
3. Saurabh Sharma S/o Shri M.l. Sharma, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Pili Kothi, Kayastha Pada, Santar Road, Dholpur, Rajasthan -328001 (Roll No. 401206)
4. Sumit Kumar Jangid S/o Manohar Lal Jangid, Aged About 29 Years, R/o A-224, Ram Nagariya, Jagatpura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. (Roll No. 402381)
5. Bhoopendra Kumar Meena S/o Kalyan Prasad Meena, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Todabhim, Kamalpura, Karauli, Rajasthan. (Roll No. 406620) (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (26 of 84) [SAW-256/2023]
6. Arun Kumar Prajapat S/o Prabhu Dayal Prajapat, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Nagar Parishad Ke Pass, Ward No.11, Churu, Rajasthan. (Roll No. 405413)
7. Devi Lal Meena S/o Hari Lal Meena, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village- Post Kamalpura, Todabhim, District Karauli, Rajasthan. (Roll No. 404956)
8. Ashish Gurjar S/o Ramphool Gurjar, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Baroni, Tonk, Rajasthan. (Roll No. 403691)
9. Asha Meena D/o Kailash Meena, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Plot No. 11, Shiv Colony, Dyanand Nagar, Jhalana Doongri, Jaipur. (Roll No. 404094)
10. Seema Vishnoi S/o Ramprakash Vishnoi, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Plot No. 372, Laxmi Nagar, Paota B Road, Jodhpur, Rajasthan. (Roll No. 407907)
11. Manan Rawal S/o Shri Bhupendra Rawal, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Punjpur, Dungarpur, Rajasthan. (Roll No. 407890)
12. Kanwar Pal Meena S/o Somlal Meena, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Ward No.11 Chotiundari, Badi Undari, Udaipur Khurd, Rajasthan. (Roll No. 400878)
13. Prateek Mittal S/o Shri Manoj Mittal, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Behind Jain Temple Near Katra School, Nadbai Bharatpur, Rajasthan. (Roll No. 404416)
14. Vikram Meena S/o Shri Sanwar Mal Meena, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village Guwarli, Dhani, Mayawali, Post Jaysingh, Tehsil Chomu, Jaipur, Rajasthan. (Roll No. 406766)
15. Umesh Meena S/o Banai Singh Meena, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Village Post Ranoli, Tehsil Todabhim, District Karauli, Rajasthan. (Roll No. 406329)
16. Dharam Singh S/o Babu Lal Meena, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Village Bilona Khurd, Tehsil Lalsot Dausa, Rajasthan. (Roll No. 405878)
17. Pawan Kumar S/o Balram Shukla, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Ganesh Pura Vistar Yojana, Near Swastik Gas Agency, Lakheri, Bundi, Rajasthan. (Roll No. 405974)
18. Manoj Kumar S/o Shri Hari Lal Bairwa, Aged About 33 Years, R/o 39, Shivaji Nagar, Near Church, Bijainagar, Ajmer, Rajasthan. (Roll No. 400132) (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (27 of 84) [SAW-256/2023]
19. Pourush Potaliya S/o Ramchandra Ji, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Vpo Green Park, Sagar Road, Near Sophia School, Bikaner, Rajasthan. (Roll No. 401624)
20. Virender Singh Bhati S/o Shri Gaje Singh Bhati, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Lawera Khurd, Lavera Baori, Jodhpur, Rajasthan. (Roll No. 407411)
21. Shweta Jhajhotar D/o Hemchand Jhajhotar, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Vinod Takija Ke Peeche, Bappa Basti, Banswara, Rajasthan. (Roll No. 402665)
----Appellants Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Transport, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board (Rssb), Through Its Secretary, State Agriculture Management Institution Campus, Durgapura, Jaipur.
3. Ravin Shekhawat S/o Padam Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Karni Colony Ajeetgarh, Tehsil Srimadhopur, District Sikar, Rajasthan -332701.
4. Narendra Saini S/o Bharat Singh Saini, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Swami Dayanand Nagar, Ward No.4, Tijara, District Alwar (Raj.)
5. Bharat Bhushan Pandey S/o Suresh Chand Pandey, Aged About 34 Years, R/o 588A, Sukya Nagar, Gopalpura Bye Pass, Jaipur (Raj.)
6. Dashrath Singh S/o Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o 53/151, Badrinath Colony, Sagar Road, Amer, Jaipur (Raj.)
7. Bhupendra Singh S/o Om Prakash, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Vpo Bachhrain, Tehsil Weir, District Bharatpur (Raj.)
8. Pankaj Kumar S/o Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Bhootoli District Bharatpur 321642
9. Prahlad Singh Achara Son Of Shri Phool Singh Achara, Resident Of Village And Post Shahpura, Thikaraiya, District Sikar (Rajasthan) (Roll No. 406926)
10. Naresh Kumar Son Of Shri Kishana Ram, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Daudsor, Tehsil Didwana, District Nagaur (Rajasthan) (Roll No. 402192) (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (28 of 84) [SAW-256/2023]
11. Krishna Pal Singh Rathore Son Of Shri Narendra Singh Rathore, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of 197, Bemlavaya, Kuradabad Kuraear, Kurawar Girwa District Udaipur (Roll No. 505553)
12. The Principal Secretary, To Government, Department Of Personal, Main Building, Secretariat, Jaipur.
13. Manish Kumar Aloria S/o Shri Kailash Chand Aloria, Resident Of Samod, Jaipur.
14. Ramkesh Choudhary S/o Shri Shyoji Lal Choudhary, Resident Of In Front Of Bade Hospital, Nainwa, Bundi.
15. Virendra Singh S/o Shri Balveer Singh Gurjar, Resident Of Jagdishpura, Karauli, Rajasthan.
16. Hansraj Sidh S/o Shri Bhagwan Nath Sidh, Resident Of Sidho Ka Bass, Vpo Benisar Tehsil Shridungargarh, Bikaner.
17. Samaksh Bhardwaj S/o Shri Ramavtar Bhardwaj, Resident Of Plot No. 30-A, Pratap Nagar, Old Ramgarh Mod, Jaipur.
18. Manjeet Singh S/o Shri Harphool Singh, Resident Of Ward No. 13, Jhunjhunu.
19. Yudhishthar S/o Shri Devendra Kumar, Resident Of House No. 133, Meghwala Pada, Dabla, Jaisalmer.
20. Mohammad Aasif S/o Abdul Rseed, Resident Of B-971, Bhatta Basti, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur.
21. Sunil Kumar S/o Shri Mahendra Singh, Dabri, Hanumangarh, Rajasthan.
22. Khagesh Sharma S/o Shri Surendra Kumar Sharma, Resident Of Arya Samaj Gali, Deeg, Bharatpur.
23. Ram Lal S/o Shri Prem Das, Resident Of 2 Bpsm, Ganganagar, Rajasthan.
24. Roshan Kumar S/o Shri Kashi Ram, Resident Of Manpura Bas, Bhalau Teeba, Bhalau Tal, Churu.
25. Lalit Jangid S/o Shri Shishpal Jangid, Resident Of Navadera Chourya, Ratanpur Road, Dungarpur, Rajasthan.
26. Magram Poonar S/o Shri Tikku Ram Poonar, Resident Of B-
106, Shankar Nagar, Jhawar Road, Jodhpur.
----Respondents D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 257/2023 (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (29 of 84) [SAW-256/2023]
1. Shiva Bairwa S/o Jay Kumar, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 2, Surya Nagar Colony, Bypass Road, Khareli Ganj, Alwar, Rajasthan
2. Kritartha Tailor S/o Sh. Dheeraj Tailor, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 24, Adarsh Nagar, Link Road, Dungarpur, Rajasthan.
3. Chaitanya Nayak S/o Jamnalal Nayak, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of Mukam Labana Colony, Gamri Ahada, Dungarpur, Rajasthan.
4. Dilip Singh Panwar S/o Pratap Singh Panwar, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of Village Bambori, Ward No. 2, Bambori, Pratapgarh, Rajasthan.
5. Pawan Singh Gurjar S/o Ram Kumar Gurjar, Aged About 32 Years, Resident Of 09, Manda, Karouli, Rajasthan.
6. Siddharth Yadav S/o Avinash Yadav, Aged About 29 Years, Resident Of Milakpur, Alwar, Rajasthan.
7. Abhishek Sharma S/o Ashok Kumar Sharma, Aged About 29 Years, Resident Of C-4, Jawahar Nagar, Bharatpur, Rajasthan.
8. Abhishek Sharma S/o Ambesh Kumar Sharma, Aged About 29 Years, Resident Of 36F, Arajiya Road, Subhash Nagar East Extension, Bhilwara, Rajasthan.
9. Naveen Kumar Bairva S/o Santosh Kumar Bairva, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Nagal Jhamarwada, Biwai, Dausa, Rajasthan.
10. Surendra Singh Devra S/o Arjun Singh Devra, Aged About 32 Years, Resident Of House No. 90, Singawato Ka Wada, Tehsil Girwa, Debari, Udaipur, Rajasthan.
11. Karan Khinchi S/o Shankar Lal Khinchi, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of Ramdwara Vistar Yojana Udaipur Road, War No. 7, Sagwara, Udaipur, Rajasthan.
12. Anshul Paliwal S/o Ramesh Chand Paliwal, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of 180, Diyan, Tehsil Gogunda, Sayra, Diyan, Udaipur, Rajasthan.
13. Ankit Sharma S/o Santosh Sharma, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of F-105, Road No. 2, Ipi Area, Kota, Indrapura, Kota, Rajasthan.
14. Naresh S/o Hanuman Ram, Aged About 28 Years, Resident (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (30 of 84) [SAW-256/2023] Of Telephone Exchange Tower, Pipar City, Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
15. Rijwan Samma S/o Liyakat Ali, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of New Masjid Road, Near Akhtar Ki Tall, Indra Colony, Bikaner, Rajasthan.
16. Arvind Pratap Singh S/o Prabhu Singh Rathore, Aged About 29 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 9, Rajpoot Mohalla, Odeet, Tehsil Ladnun, Odeet, Nagaur, Rajasthan
17. Hitendra Poonia S/o Nanu Ram Punia, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of 423, Puniyo Ki Dhaani, Vpo Bhainsaula, Renwal, Tehsil Phulera, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
18. Manish Kumar S/o Gopa Ram, Aged About 34 Years, Resident Of 301, Lakho Ji Ka Bera, Narwa Khichiyan, Jodhpur, Rajasthan
19. Sarveshwar Kumar Tailor S/o Mahaveer Prasad Tailor, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Naiyo Ki Gali, Vpo Jamola, Tehsil Masuda, Ajmer, Rajasthan.
20. Siddharth Singh Rajoriya S/o Rajendra Singh Rajoriya, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of Behind New Hostel, Kayasthpara, Dhaulpur, Rajasthan
21. Sanjay Kumar Suthar S/o Babulal Suthar, Aged About 33 Years, Resident Of 81 Vidhyanagar, Paota C Road, Jodhpur, Rajasthan
22. Tanwar Singh S/o Ummed Singh, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of Vpo Hingoniya, Jodhiyasi, Tehsil Nagaur, Rajasthan.
23. Abhishek Songara S/o Dharamchand, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of 5J5 Chandrashekhar Azad Nagar, Bhilwara, Rajasthan
24. Parul Pareek D/o Rajesh Pareek, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of 21 E/295, Chopasani Housing Board, Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
25. Sangeeta Geela D/o Narayan Lal Geela, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Village Gadri, Post Badhal, Tehsil Kishangarh, Renwal, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
26. Bhagchand Kumawat S/o Bhanwarlal, Aged About 36 Years, Resident Of Amkash Ki Dhaani, Nagar, Via Jobner, Tehsil Jobner, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
(Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (31 of 84) [SAW-256/2023]
27. Virendra Singh S/o Jagdeesh Singh, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Near Water Works, Lotholia Marg, Kukanwali, Nagaur, Rajasthan.
28. Nikhil Choudhary S/o Ramlal, Aged About 32 Years, Resident Of Sesli Road, Kishan Basti, Behind School Bera Lopara, Bali, Pali, Rajasthan.
29. Ravin Shekhawat S/o Padam Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Karni Colony Ajeetgarh, Tehsil Srimadopur, District Sikar, Rajasthan-332701.
----Appellants Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Transport, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board (Rssb), Through Its Secretary, State Agriculture Management Institution Campus, Durgapura, Jaipur.
3. The Principal Secretary, To Government, Department Of Personal, Main Building, Secretariat, Jaipur.
4. Manish Kumar Aloria S/o Shri Kailash Chand Aloria, Resident Of Samod, Jaipur.
5. Ramkesh Choudhary S/o Shri Shyoji Lal Choudhary, Resident Of In Front Of Bade Hospital, Nainwa, Bundi.
6. Virendra Singh S/o Shri Balveer Singh Gurjar, Resident Of Jagdishpura, Karauli, Rajasthan.
7. Hansraj Sidh S/o Shri Bhagwan Nath Sidh, Resident Of Sidho Ka Bass, Vpo Benisar Tehsil Shridungargarh, Bikaner.
8. Samaksh Bhardwaj S/o Shri Ramavtar Bhardwaj, Resident Of Plot No. 30-A, Pratap Nagar, Old Ramgarh Mod, Jaipur.
9. Manjeet Singh S/o Shri Harphool Singh, Resident Of Ward No. 13, Jhunjhunu.
10. Yudhishthar S/o Shri Devendra Kumar, Resident Of House No. 133, Meghwala Pada, Dabla, Jaisalmer.
11. Mohammad Aasif S/o Abdul Rseed, Resident Of B-971, Bhatta Basti, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur.
12. Sunil Kumar S/o Shri Mahendra Singh, Dabri, Hanumangarh, Rajasthan.
(Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (32 of 84) [SAW-256/2023]
13. Khagesh Sharma S/o Shri Surendra Kumar Sharma, Resident Of Arva Samaj Gali, Deeg, Bharatpur.
14. Ram Lal S/o Shri Prem Das, Resident Of 2 Bpsm, Ganganagar, Rajasthan.
15. Roshan Kumar S/o Shri Kashi Ram, Resident Of Manpura Bas, Bhalau Teeba, Bhalau Tal, Churu.
16. Lalit Jangid S/o Shri Shishpal Jangid, Resident Of Navadera Chourva, Ratanpur Road, Dungarpur, Rajasthan.
17. Magram Poonar S/o Shri Tikku Ram Poonar, Resident Of B-
106, Shankar Nagar, Jhawar Road, Jodhpur.
18. Bharat Bhushan Pandey S/o Suresh Chand Pandey, R/o 588A, Sukva Nagar, Gopalpura Bye Pass, Jaipur (Raj.)
19. Dashrath Singh S/o Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o 53/151, Badrinath Colony, Sagar Road, Amer, Jaipur (Raj.)
20. Pankaj Kumar S/o Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Bhootoli District Bharatpur 321642
21. Bhupendra Singh Son Of Shri Om Prakash, Resident Of Village Post Bachhren, Tehsil Bhusawar District Bharatpur (Roll No. 4011358)
22. Narendra Saini Son Of Shri Bharat Singh Saini, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Swami Dayanand Nagar, Ward No. 4, Tijara District Alwar (Roll No. 405459)
23. Prahlad Singh Achara Son Of Shri Phool Singh Achara, Resident Of Village And Post Shahpura, Thikaralya, District Sikar (Rajasthan) (Roll No. 406926)
24. Naresh Kumar Son Of Shri Kishana Ram, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Daudsor, Tehsil Didwana, District Nagaur (Rajasthan) (Roll No. 402192)
25. Krishna Pal Singh Rathore Son Of Shri Narendra Singh Rathore, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of 197, Bemlavaya, Kuradabad Kuraear, Kurawar Girwa District Udaipur (Roll No. 505553)
----Respondents D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 258/2023
1. Manoj Sharma S/o Murari Lal Sharma, Aged About 34 Years, R/o 59 A, Shivaji Nagar, Near Jai Sharda School, Sector-71, Shyopur, Pratap Nagar, Jaipur 302033 (Raj.).
(Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (33 of 84) [SAW-256/2023]
2. Udit Kumar Sharma S/o Anil Kumar Sharma, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Mansarover Colony, Behind Naveen Bus Stand, Rajgarh, Alwar 301408 (Raj.).
3. Akhilesh Paliwal S/o Narendra Kumar, Aged About 33 Years, R/o 3/ma/ 516, Indira Gandhi Nagar, Jagatpura, District Jaipur - 302017.
4. Naresh Kumawat S/o Laxminarayan, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Near Kedia Guest House, Ward No. 15/6, Chirwa, Distt. Jhunjhunu (Raj.).
5. Jeetendra Sharma S/o Hardayal Sharma, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Krishi Nagar, Toll Tax, Sanganer, Jaipur 302033 (Raj.).
6. Ram Naresh S/o Rampal Jakhar, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Opposite Of Sdm Office, Bhoplagarh, Tehsil Bhopalgarh, Distt. Jodhpur (Raj.).
7. Vikas Yadav S/o Kailash Chand Yadav, Aged About 26 Years, R/o 163/29 Pratap Nagar, Sanganer, Distt. Jaipur (Raj.).
8. Keshav Kumar Meena S/o Rajendra Kumar Meena, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Naharkhora, Post Dainda Badedi, Sikari, Distt. Dausa, Rajasthan - 303502.
9. Ashish Agarwal S/o Kailash Chand Goyal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o House No. 5, Prem Mandir Colony, Bajariya, Distt. Sawaimadhopur 322001 (Raj.).
10. Ankit Punia S/o Chandgi Ram Punia, Aged About 25 Years, R/o 229-A, Ganni Colony, Distt. Jhunjhunu 333001 (Raj.).
11. Mahesh Chand Meena S/o Omprakash Meena, Aged About 28 Years, R/o 55, Patel Nagar, Ranthambhore Road, Distt. Sawaimadhopur 322001 (Raj.).
12. Kana Ram S/o Harikaran Ram, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village Harnawa Patty, Tehsil-Parbatsar, Distt. Nagaur (Raj.).
13. Lalit Jyani S/o Ramdeen Jyani, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 52-A, Civil Airport Road, Pabapura, Distt. Jodhpur - 342001 (Raj.).
14. Shailendra Kumar Meena S/o Ramji Lal Meena, Aged About 35 Years, R/o 4/b, Moti Nagar, Bandikui, Distt. Dausa - 303313 (Raj.).
(Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (34 of 84) [SAW-256/2023]
15. Mahesh Meghwal S/o Chunni Lal, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village And Post Rani Station, Pratap Bazar, Subhash Nagar, Distt. Pali 306115 (Raj.).
16. Akshay Joshi S/o Kamal Nayan Joshi, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Opp. Govt. Girls School, Govt. Hospital Road, Makrana, Distt. Nagaur-341505 (Raj.).
17. Ravi Saraswat S/o Madan Mohan Saraswat, Aged About 31 Years, R/o 53, Bohro Ka Bass, Village And Post Muhana, Tehsil Sanganer, Distt. Jaipur-302029 (Raj.).
18. Pradeep Thinger S/o Shankar Lal Thinger, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Near Gren View Thinger Niwas, Mount Abu, Distt. Sirohi 307501 (Raj.).
19. Vivek Kumar Sharma S/o Vasudev Sharma, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village And Post Mocha, Tehsil Wazirpur, Distt. Sawaimadhopur - 322205 (Raj.).
20. Ved Prakash S/o Girraj Prasad, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Village And Post Ghansoli, Tehsil-Kishangarh Bas, Distt. Alwar - 301405 (Raj.).
21. Prahlad Singh Achara S/o Phool Singh Achara, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village And Post Shahpura, Thikariya, Tehsil Khandela, Distt. Sikar - 332411 (Raj.).
22. Rajesh Kumar S/o Roor Mal Meena, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 128, Shyam Nagar, Near Nadi Ka Phatak, Benar Road, Jhothwara, Distt. Jaipur - 302012 (Raj.).
23. Yogender Singh S/o Vijay Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village-9 Ptd (B), Post Mokhamwala, Tehsil Raisingh Nagar, Distt. Shriganagar-335051 (Raj.).
24. Ajay Pal Singh S/o Heera Singh, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 384, Krishna Nagar, Bharatpur-321001 (Raj.).
25. Anil Kumar Meghwal S/o Bhanwar Lal Meghwal, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Gatod Sarada, Ghatod, Distt. Udaipur-13905 (Raj.).
26. Dharmendra Meena S/o Shivram Meena, Aged About 26 Years, R/o House No. 22 Gali No. 2, New Kesari Colony, Balupura Road, Adarsh Nagar, Distt. Ajmer-305001 (Raj.).
27. Bharat Kumar Sen S/o Devi Lal, Aged About 31 Years, R/o 189, Dagalmand Lakadwas, Girva, Distt. Udaipur - 313001 (Raj.).
(Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (35 of 84) [SAW-256/2023]
28. Krishna Pal Singh Rathore S/o Narendra Singh Rathore, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Bemla, Post Bemla, Tehsil-Girwar, Distt. Udaipur-313002 (Raj.).
29. Bharat Bansal S/o Sunil Bansal, Aged About 25 Years, R/o 2/18, Rhb Colony, Sector-9, Saweena, (Rural) Distt. Udaipur - 313002 (Raj.).
30. Pradeep Singh Shekhawat S/o Ramesh Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o 4/48, Vivekanand Nagar, Near Meera Mandir, Kala Kuan, Distt. Alwar-301001 (Raj.).
31. Satyapal S/o Deva Ram, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Budharri Hudon Ki Dhani, Neembal Kot, Barmer - 344033 (Raj.).
32. Trilok Jangid S/o Lokmani Jangid, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Village Malootana, Thanagazi, Distt. Alwar (Raj.)
33. Arvind Singh S/o Kan Singh Rathore, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 52-A, Laxmi Nagar-A, Niwaru Road, Jhotwara, Distt. Jaipur 302012 (Raj.).
34. Sunita Choudhary S/o Gopal Krishan Choudhary, Aged About 26 Years, R/o 3/83 Panchsheel Enclave, Makdawali Road, Distt. Ajmer-305001 (Raj.).
35. Manish Kumar S/o Ranveer Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Budaniya, Distt. Jhunjhunu - 333025 (Raj.).
36. Pooja Chaudhary D/o Bhanwar Lal Chaudhary, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Bawari, Post Rasidpura, Tehsil - Didwana, Distt. Nagaur - 341517 (Raj.).
37. Jaipal Singh S/o Phool Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Pehal, Tehsil - Mundawar, Distt. Alwar-301404 (Raj.).
38. Saurabh Singh S/o Sanjay Kumar, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Village And Post Pathena, Tehsil, Distt. Bharatpur (Raj.).
39. Narendra Saini S/o Bharat Singh Saini, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Swami Dayanand Nagar, Ward No. 4, Tijara, District Alwar, Rajasthan.
40. Dashrath Singh S/o Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o 53/151, Badrinath Colony, Sagar Road, Amer, Jaipur (Raj.).
41. Bhupendra Singh S/o Om Prakash, Aged About 29 Years, (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (36 of 84) [SAW-256/2023] R/o Vpo Bachhrain, Tehsil Weir, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan.
42. Pankaj Kumar S/o Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Bhootoli, District Bharatpur - 321642.
----Appellants Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Transport, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.).
2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board (Rssb), Through Its President, State Agriculture Management Institution Campus, Durgapura, Jaipur.
3. Indraj Singh S/o Shri Guljhari Lal, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village Jat Bhagola, Tehsil Mundawar, Alwar, Rajasthan.
----Respondents D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 273/2023
1. Manoj Sharma S/o Murari Lal Sharma, Aged About 34 Years, R/o 59 A, Shivaji Nagar, Near Jai Sharda School, Sector-71, Shyopur, Pratap Nagar, Jaipur 302033 (Raj.).
2. Udit Kumar Sharma S/o Anil Kumar Sharma, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Mansarover Colony, Behind Naveen Bus Stand, Rajgarh, Alwar 301408 (Raj.).
3. Akhilesh Paliwal S/o Narendra Kumar, Aged About 33 Years, R/o 3/ma/ 516, Indira Gandhi Nagar, Jagatpura, District Jaipur - 302017.
4. Naresh Kumawat S/o Laxminarayan, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Near Kedia Guest House, Ward No. 15/6, Chirwa, Distt. Jhunjhunu (Raj.).
5. Jeetendra Sharma S/o Hardayal Sharma, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Krishi Nagar, Toll Tax, Sanganer, Jaipur 302033 (Raj.).
6. Ram Naresh S/o Rampal Jakhar, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Opposite Of Sdm Office, Bhoplagarh, Tehsil Bhopalgarh, Distt. Jodhpur (Raj.).
7. Vikas Yadav S/o Kailash Chand Yadav, Aged About 26 Years, R/o 163/29 Pratap Nagar, Sanganer, Distt. Jaipur (Raj.).
8. Keshav Kumar Meena S/o Rajendra Kumar Meena, Aged (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (37 of 84) [SAW-256/2023] About 28 Years, R/o Village Naharkhora, Post Dainda Badedi, Sikari, Distt. Dausa, Rajasthan - 303502.
9. Ashish Agarwal S/o Kailash Chand Goyal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o House No. 5, Prem Mandir Colony, Bajariya, Distt. Sawaimadhopur 322001 (Raj.).
10. Ankit Punia S/o Chandgi Ram Punia, Aged About 25 Years, R/o 229-A, Ganni Colony, Distt. Jhunjhunu 333001 (Raj.).
11. Mahesh Chand Meena S/o Omprakash Meena, Aged About 28 Years, R/o 55, Patel Nagar, Ranthambhore Road, Distt. Sawaimadhopur 322001 (Raj.).
12. Kana Ram S/o Harikaran Ram, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village Harnawa Patty, Tehsil-Parbatsar, Distt. Nagaur (Raj.).
13. Lalit Jyani S/o Ramdeen Jyani, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 52-A, Civil Airport Road, Pabapura, Distt. Jodhpur - 342001 (Raj.).
14. Shailendra Kumar Meena S/o Ramji Lal Meena, Aged About 35 Years, R/o 4/b, Moti Nagar, Bandikui, Distt. Dausa - 303313 (Raj.).
15. Mahesh Meghwal S/o Chunni Lal, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village And Post Rani Station, Pratap Bazar, Subhash Nagar, Distt. Pali 306115 (Raj.).
16. Akshay Joshi S/o Kamal Nayan Joshi, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Opp. Govt. Girls School, Govt. Hospital Road, Makrana, Distt. Nagaur-341505 (Raj.).
17. Ravi Saraswat S/o Madan Mohan Saraswat, Aged About 31 Years, R/o 53, Bohro Ka Bass, Village And Post Muhana, Tehsil Sanganer, Distt. Jaipur-302029 (Raj.).
18. Pradeep Thinger S/o Shankar Lal Thinger, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Near Gren View Thinger Niwas, Mount Abu, Distt. Sirohi 307501 (Raj.).
19. Vivek Kumar Sharma S/o Vasudev Sharma, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village And Post Mocha, Tehsil Wazirpur, Distt. Sawaimadhopur - 322205 (Raj.).
20. Ved Prakash S/o Girraj Prasad, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Village And Post Ghansoli, Tehsil-Kishangarh Bas, Distt. Alwar - 301405 (Raj.).
21. Prahlad Singh Achara S/o Phool Singh Achara, Aged About (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (38 of 84) [SAW-256/2023] 27 Years, R/o Village And Post Shahpura, Thikariya, Tehsil Khandela, Distt. Sikar - 332411 (Raj.).
22. Rajesh Kumar S/o Roor Mal Meena, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 128, Shyam Nagar, Near Nadi Ka Phatak, Benar Road, Jhothwara, Distt. Jaipur - 302012 (Raj.).
23. Yogender Singh S/o Vijay Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village-9 Ptd (B), Post Mokhamwala, Tehsil Raisingh Nagar, Distt. Shriganagar-335051 (Raj.).
24. Ajay Pal Singh S/o Heera Singh, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 384, Krishna Nagar, Bharatpur-321001 (Raj.).
25. Anil Kumar Meghwal S/o Bhanwar Lal Meghwal, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Gatod Sarada, Ghatod, Distt. Udaipur-13905 (Raj.).
26. Dharmendra Meena S/o Shivram Meena, Aged About 26 Years, R/o House No. 22 Gali No. 2, New Kesari Colony, Balupura Road, Adarsh Nagar, Distt. Ajmer-305001 (Raj.).
27. Bharat Kumar Sen S/o Devi Lal, Aged About 31 Years, R/o 189, Dagalmand Lakadwas, Girva, Distt. Udaipur - 313001 (Raj.).
28. Krishna Pal Singh Rathore S/o Narendra Singh Rathore, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Bemla, Post Bemla, Tehsil-Girwar, Distt. Udaipur-313002 (Raj.).
29. Bharat Bansal S/o Sunil Bansal, Aged About 25 Years, R/o 2/18, Rhb Colony, Sector-9, Saweena, (Rural) Distt. Udaipur - 313002 (Raj.).
30. Pradeep Singh Shekhawat S/o Ramesh Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o 4/48, Vivekanand Nagar, Near Meera Mandir, Kala Kuan, Distt. Alwar-301001 (Raj.).
31. Satyapal S/o Deva Ram, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Budharri Hudon Ki Dhani, Neembal Kot, Barmer - 344033 (Raj.).
32. Trilok Jangid S/o Lokmani Jangid, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Village Malootana, Thanagazi, Distt. Alwar (Raj.)
33. Arvind Singh S/o Kan Singh Rathore, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 52-A, Laxmi Nagar-A, Niwaru Road, Jhotwara, Distt. Jaipur 302012 (Raj.).
34. Sunita Choudhary S/o Gopal Krishan Choudhary, Aged About 26 Years, R/o 3/83 Panchsheel Enclave, Makdawali (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (39 of 84) [SAW-256/2023] Road, Distt. Ajmer-305001 (Raj.).
35. Manish Kumar S/o Ranveer Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Budaniya, Distt. Jhunjhunu - 333025 (Raj.).
36. Pooja Chaudhary D/o Bhanwar Lal Chaudhary, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Bawari, Post Rasidpura, Tehsil - Didwana, Distt. Nagaur - 341517 (Raj.).
37. Jaipal Singh S/o Phool Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Pehal, Tehsil - Mundawar, Distt. Alwar-301404 (Raj.).
38. Saurabh Singh S/o Sanjay Kumar, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Village And Post Pathena, Tehsil, Distt. Bharatpur (Raj.).
39. Narendra Saini S/o Bharat Singh Saini, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Swami Dayanand Nagar, Ward No. 4, Tijara, District Alwar, Rajasthan.
40. Dashrath Singh S/o Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o 53/151, Badrinath Colony, Sagar Road, Amer, Jaipur (Raj.).
41. Bhupendra Singh S/o Om Prakash, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Vpo Bachhrain, Tehsil Weir, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan.
42. Pankaj Kumar S/o Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Bhootoli, District Bharatpur - 321642.
----Appellants Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Transport, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, (Rssb), Through Its Secretary, State Agriculture Management Institution Campus, Durgapura, Jaipur.
3. Sunil Verma S/o Shri Ramji Lal Verma, Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of New Colony, Tehsil And Village Rajgarh, District Alwar.
4. Ravi Vyas S/o Shri Gautam Vyas, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of Karera Road, Bhartu Bhim Post Bhim Tehsil Bhim District Rajsamand.
----Respondents D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 281/2023 (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (40 of 84) [SAW-256/2023]
1. Akib S/o Yusuf Ali, Aged About 31 Years, Resident Of Near Kalu Khan Ward No. 22, Sardar Shahar, Churu .
2. Arun Bairwa S/o Shri Jagdish Prasad Bairwa, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of Gupteshware Road, Netaji Shubhash Chandra Bose Colony, Dausa
3. Sanjay Kumar Meena S/o Shri Battu Ram Meena, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Village Post Bairer, Tehsil Reni, Alwar
4. Puneet Sharma S/o Shri Rajendra Prasad Sharma, Aged About 32 Years, Resident Of 176, Block B, Shyam Nagar, Bhuwana, Udaipur
5. Akshat Singh Jhala S/o Shri Mahipal Singh Jhala, Aged About 31 Years, Resident Of 173, Khatiyon Ka Mohalla, Near Middle School, Gogunda
6. Abhay Raj Singh S/o Shri Tikendra Singh, Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of Dhalmu, Post Dudli Tanda, Dhalmoo, Pratapgarh
7. Akash Rajpurohit S/o Shri Rajendra Rajpurohit, Aged About 32 Years, Resident Of 5-E-251, Jnv Colony, Bikaner
8. Prashant Khandelwal S/o Shree Narayan Khandelwal, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 3, Laptiniyo Ka Mohalla, Viratnagar, Tehsil Viratnagar, Papri, District Jaipur
9. Narendra Singh Lekhi S/o Shri Mani Ram Jatav, Aged About 31 Years, Resident Of Ni Basti, Delhi Road, Diwakri, Alwar
10. Rahul Soni S/o Shri Girdhari Lal, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of R-4/521, Stps Thermal Colony, Shri Ganganagar, Suratgarh
11. Lakha Ram S/o Shri Jagdish Sankhla, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Khiyanio Ka Bera, Balesar, Satta, Balesar Satan, Jodhpur
12. Neeraj Kumar S/o Shri Raj Singh, Aged About 33 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 13, Laxman Das Colony, Jagannathpura, Khatipura Near By Jas Ram Public School, Jhotwara, Jaipur
13. Lokesh Kumar Meena S/o Shri Sohan Lal Meena, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Opposite D-10, Malviya Nagar, Alwar (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (41 of 84) [SAW-256/2023]
14. Sudarshan Jugtawat S/o Shri Arvind Jugtawat, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of H.no. 143, Mahajanon Ka Vas, Parlu, Barmer
15. Tushar Joshi S/o Shri Rameshwar Lal, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of 1 Ba 51, Old Housing Board, Pali
16. Hitesh Saini S/o Shri Kundan Singh Saini, Aged About 34 Years, Resident Of Lisoda Wala Kuwa, Near Roadways Bus Stand, Alwar
17. Mahaveer Singh S/o Shri Pradeep Singh, Aged About 29 Years, Resident Of 333, Kailashpuri, Lalgarh, Bikaner
18. Tayyaba Ali D/o Manzoor Ali, Aged About 22 Years, Resident Of Aarya Samaj Ke Samne, Farhat Manjil, Ward No. 6, Jhalrapatan, Jhalawar
19. Bhavya Kanwar Rawat D/o Shri Vijay Singh Rawat, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of 21, Balaji Nagar, Manwa Khera (Rural), Hiran Magri, Udaipur
20. Mohit Bholecha S/o Shri Narsing Ram Bholecha, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of 102, Society Nagar, Bhalelao Road Ke Pass, Pali
21. Priyanka Vijay D/o Shri Niranjan Lal Vijay, Aged About 38 Years, Resident Of 11, Chaya Deep 1St, Mahesh Nagar, Jaipur
22. Anusha Bhatt D/o Shri Jugal Kishore Bhatt, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of 124-C, Pratap Nagar, Chittorgarh
23. Gorvenshu S/o Shri Subhash Chandra, Aged About 29 Years, Resident Of Birol, Jhunjhunu
24. Rahul Kumar Meena S/o Shri Shiv Ram Meena, Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of The. Nadauti, Dhahariya, Karauli
----Appellants Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Transport, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, (Rssb), Through Its Secretary, State Agriculture Management Institution Campus, Durgapura, Jaipur.
3. The Principal Secretary, To Government, Department Of Personal, Main Building, Secretariat, Jaipur.
(Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (42 of 84) [SAW-256/2023]
4. Manish Kumar Aloria S/o Shri Kailash Chand Aloria, Resident Of Samod, Jaipur.
5. Ramkesh Choudhary S/o Shri Shyoji Lal Choudhary, Resident Of In Front Of Bade Hospital, Nainwa, Bundi.
6. Virendra Singh S/o Shri Balveer Singh Gurjar, Resident Of Jagdishpura, Karauli, Rajasthan.
7. Hansrajsidh S/o Shri Bhagwan Nath Sidh, Resident Of Sidho Ka Bass, Vpo Benisar Tehsil Shridungargarh, Bikaner.
8. Samaksh Bhardwaj S/o Shri Ramavtar Bhardwaj, Resident Of Plot No. 30-A, Pratap Nagar, Old Ramgarh Mod, Jaipur.
9. Manjeet Singh S/o Shri Harphool Singh, Resident Of Ward No. 13, Jhunjhunu.
10. Yudhishthar S/o Shri Devendra Kumar, Resident Of House No. 133, Meghwala Pada, Dabla, Jaisalmer.
11. Mohammad Aasif S/o Abdul Rseed, Resident Of B-971, Bhatta Basti, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur.
12. Sunil Kumar S/o Shri Mahendra Singh, Dabri, Hanumangarh, Rajasthan.
13. Khagesh Sharma S/o Shri Surendra Kumar Sharma, Resident Of Arya Samaj Gali, Deeg, Bharatpur.
14. Ram Lal S/o Shri Prem Das, Resident Of 2 Bpsm, Ganganagar, Rajasthan.
15. Roshan Kumar S/o Shri Kashi Ram, Resident Of Manpura Bas, Bhalau Teeba, Bhalau Tal, Churu.
16. Lalit Jangid S/o Shri Shishpal Jangid, Resident Of Navadera Chourya, Ratanpur Road, Dungarpur, Rajasthan.
17. Magram Poonar S/o Shri Tikku Ram Poonar, Resident Of B-
106, Shankar Nagar, Jhawar Road, Jodhpur.
18. Ravin Shekhawat S/o Padam Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Karni Colony Ajeetgarh, Tehsil Srimadopur, District Sikar, Rajasthan-332701.
19. Narendra Saini S/o Bharat Singh Saini, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Swami Dayanand Nagar, Ward No.4, Tijara, District Alwar (Raj.)
20. Bharat Bhushan Pandey S/o Suresh Chand Pandey, Aged About 34 Years, R/o 588A, Sukya Nagar, Gopalpura Bye Pass, Jaipur (Raj.) (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (43 of 84) [SAW-256/2023]
21. Dashrath Singh S/o Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o 53/151, Badrinath Colony, Sagar Road, Amer, Jaipur (Raj.)
22. Bhupendra Singh S/o Om Prakash, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Vpo Bachhrain, Tehsil Weir, District Bharatpur (Raj.)
23. Pankaj Kumar S/o Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Bhootoli District Bharatpur 321642
24. Prahlad Singh Achara Son Of Shri Phool Singh Achara, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Shahpura, Thikaraiya, District Sikar (Rajasthan) (Roll No. 406926)
25. Naresh Kumar Son Of Shrikishana Ram, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Daudsor, Tehsil Didwana, District Nagaur (Rajasthan) (Roll No. 402192)
26. Krishna Pal Singh Rathore Son Of Shri Narendra Singh Rathore, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of 197, Bemlavaya, Kuradabad Kuraear, Kurawar Girwa District Udaipur (Roll No. 505553)
----Respondents D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 286/2023
1. Satya Prakash Saini S/o Dhoor Mal Saini, R/o Bhomia Nagar, Near Sai Public School Kalwar Raod, Jhotwara, Jaipur, Rajasthan-302012
2. Sumit Chaudhary S/o Surya Pal Singh, R/o 96,gauri Shankar Colony, Near Saras Hotel, Bharatpur, Rajasthan- 321001
3. Mukesh Kumar Ola S/o Sagarmal Choudhary, R/o 155, Kishorepura, Doongarsi Ka Bas, Tehsil Kishangarh Renwal, Karansar, Jaipur Rajasthan-303603
4. Rajesh Kumar Meena S/o Kailash Chand Meena, R/o- 14, Vivek Vihar Mode, Jagatpura, Radha Krishna Colony, Jaipur- Rajasthan-302017.
5. Digamber Singh S/o Ramhans, Shroti Mohalla, Kaman, Bharatpur- Rajasthan-321022
6. Ranveer Singh Gurjar S/o, Shree Vijay Singh Gurjar, Kherla Khurd, Post- Hingotiya Tehsil-Lawan Distt.-Dausa, Rajasthan-303303
7. Krishan Kumar S/o Man Singh, R/o- Anah Gate Bajariya, (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (44 of 84) [SAW-256/2023] Bharatpura, Rajasthan-321001
8. Hariom Gurjar S/o Ladu Ram Gurjar, Dhani, Manpura, Vtc-
Balriya, Po- Balaria, Chauth Ka Barwara, District- Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan-322702.
9. Hement Makerr S/o Rugha Ram Makerr, Panchayat Samiti Ke Pichhe, Ward No. 27, Suratgarh, Ganganagar, Rajasthan-335804
10. Manoj Kumar Gurjar S/o Gajraj Singh Gurjar, Village-
Kutakpur, Tehsil-Mahwa Vtc- Amarpur, Dist.-Dausa Rajasthan-321612.
11. Hetram Gurjar S/o Sher Singh Gurjar, Jalalpur, Mundana, Alwar, Tijara, Rajasthan-301411.
12. Vijay Kumar S/o Om Prakash, R/o- Mehtab Colony, New Gharsana, Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan-335707.
13. Amit Verma S/o Girraj Prasad, B-256, Shakti Nagar, Kundanpuri Road, Alwar, Rajasthan-301001.
14. Mukesh Kumar Khatik S/o, Bansi Lal Khatik, R/o- 23, Malan, Ram Vihar Road, Subhash Nagar, Bhilwara, Rajasthan-311001
15. Hetram S/o Har Lal, R/o-160, Ward No. 1, Sds, Rajasthan-
335062.
16. Mohan Lal Gadwal S/o Murli Dhar Gadwal, R/o- Ward No.6, Dhani Garhwalon Ki, V.p.o. Jaje Kalan Tehsil- Shahpura, District- Jaipur,rajasthan-303103
17. Chirag Masar S/o Shri Ram Chandra Masar, R/o Fala-
Dinglal, Village-Gumanpura, Tehsil-Rishabdeo, District- Udaipur,
----Appellants Versus
1. Manish Kumar Aloria S/o, Shri Kailash Chand Aloria, R/o, Samod, Jaipur, Rajasthan
2. Ramkesh Chaudhary S/o Shri Shyoji Lal Choudhary, Resident Of In Front Of Bade Hospital, Nainwa, Bundi.
3. Virendra Singh S/o Shri Balveer Singh Gurjar, Resident Of Jagdishpura, Karauli, Rajasthan
4. Hansraj Sidh S/o Shri Bhagwan Nath Sidh, Resident Of Sidho Ka Bass, Vpo Benisar Tehsil Shridungargarh, Bikaner (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (45 of 84) [SAW-256/2023]
5. Samaksh Bhardwaj S/o Shri Ramavtar Bhardwaj, R/o, Plot. No. 30-A, Pratap Nagar, Old Ramgarh Mode, Jaipur.
6. Manjeet Singh S/o Shri Harphool Singh, R/o, Ward No. 13, Jhunjhunu.
7. Yudhisthar S/o Shri Devendra Kumar, R/o, H.no. 133, Meghwala Pada, Dabla, Jaisalmer.
8. Mohammad Aashif S/o Shri Abdul Rseed, R/o, B-971, Bhatta Basti, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur.
9. Sunil Kumar S/o Shri Mahendra Singh, R/o, Dabri, Hanumangarh, Rajasthan.
10. Khagesh Sharma S/o Shri Surendra Kumar Sharma, R/o, Arya Samaj Gali , Deeg, Bharatpur.
11. Ram Lal S/o Shri Prem Das, R/o, 2, Bpsm, Ganganagar.
12. Roshan Kumar S/o Shri Kashi Ram, R/o, Manpura Bas, Bhalau Teeba, Bhalau Tal, Churu.
13. Lalit Jangid S/o Shri Shispal Jangid, R/o, Navadera Chaurya, Ratanpur Road, Dungarpur, Rajasthan.
14. Magram Poonar S/o Shri Tikku Ram Poonar, R/o, B-106, Shankar Nagar, Jhawar Road, Jodhpur.
15. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Transport, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan
16. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board (Rssb), Through Its Secretary, State Agriculture Management Institution Campus, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan
17. Ravin Shekhawat, S/o Padam Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Karni Colony Ajeetgarh, Tehsil Srimadhopur, District Sikar, Rajasthan-332701
18. Narendra Saini, S/o Bharat Singh Saini, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Swami Dayanand Nagar, Ward No. 4, Tijara, District Alwar (Raj.)
19. Bharat Bhushan Pandey, S/o Suresh Chand Pandey, Aged About 34 Years, R/o , Swami Dayanand Nagar, Ward No. 4, Tijara, District Alwar ( Raj.)
20. Dashrath Singh, S/o Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o 53/151, Badrinath Colony, Sagar Road, Amer, Jaipur (Raj.)
21. Bhupendra Singh, S/o Shri Om Prakash, Aged About 28 (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (46 of 84) [SAW-256/2023] Years, R/o Vpo Bachhrain, Tehsil Weir, District-Bharatpur, Rajasthan
22. Pankaj Kumar, S/o Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o, Bhootoli District Bharatpur- 321642.
23. Prahlad Singh Achara, S/o Shri Phool Singh Achara, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village And Post, Shahpura, Thikaraiya, District Sikar,rajasthan.
24. Naresh Kumar, S/o Kishana Ram, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village And Post Daudsor, Tehsil Didwana, District- Nagaur- Rajasthan.
25. Krishna Pal Singh, S/o Shri Narendra Singh Rathore, Aged About 27 Years, R/o 197, Bemlavya, Kuradabad, Kuraear, Girwa District-Udaipur, Rajasthan.
26. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Personal, Government Of Rajasthan, Main Building, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Respondents D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 292/2023
1. Akhil Choudhary Son Of Bhooram Ram Khilary, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of 670, Haribhau Upadhyay Nagar Extension, Near Labour Court, Ajmer.
2. Anil Sharma Son Of Shri Vishambhar Dayal, Aged About 34 Years, Resident Of 303, Meena Colony, Durgapura, Jaipur.
3. Shivraj Singh Son Of Sangram Singh, Aged About 29 Years, Resident Of Dhanla Hattha, Panch Batti, Ratnada, Jodhpur.
----Appellants Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principle Secretary, Transport Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, State Agriculture Management Institution Campus, Durgapura, Jaipur.
3. Yogendra Kumar Agarwal Son Of Deen Dayal Agarwal, Aged About 42 Years, Resident Of Old Bayana Bus Stand, Neemda Gate, Bharatpur (Raj.).
4. Laxman Singh Bhati Son Of Shri Shiv Singh Bhati, Aged (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (47 of 84) [SAW-256/2023] About 36 Years, Resident Of Flat No.6156, Block-40, Rangoli Garden Panchyawala, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.).
5. Tejbhan Singh Son Of Rasal Singh, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of Near Cimmco Nagla, Tej Singh, Bharatpur (Raj.).
6. Meenakshi Sharma Wife Of Shri Kamal Kumar Mishra, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Plot No. A-19, Aravali Vihar, Vivekanand Colony, Dausakhurd, Dausa (Raj.).
----Respondents D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 322/2023 Vinay Pareek Son Of Shri Shiv Charan Pareek, Aged About 29 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 06, Second Floor Prem Nagar Second, Gurjar Ki Thadi, Jaipur (Raj.) (Roll No. 405383)
----Appellant Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Transport, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, (Rssb), Through Its Secretary, State Agriculture Management Institution Campus, Durgapura, Jaipur.
3. The Principal Secretary, To Government, Department Of Personal, Main Building, Secretariat, Jaipur.
4. Manish Kumar Aloria S/o Shri Kailash Chand Aloria, Resident Of Samod, Jaipur.
5. Ramkesh Choudhary S/o Shri Shyoji Lal Choudhary, Resident Of In Front Of Bade Hospital, Nainwa, Bundi.
6. Virendra Singh S/o Shri Balveer Singh Gurjar, Resident Of Jagdishpura, Karauli, Rajasthan.
7. Hansraj Sidh S/o Shri Bhagwan Nath Sidh, Resident Of Sidho Ka Bass, Vpo Benisar Tehsil Shridungargarh, Bikaner.
8. Samaksh Bhardwaj S/o Shri Ramavtar Bhardwaj, Resident Of Plot No. 30-A, Pratap Nagar, Old Ramgarh Mod, Jaipur.
9. Manjeet Singh S/o Shri Harphool Singh, Resident Of Ward No. 13, Jhunjhunu.
10. Yudhishthar S/o Shri Devendra Kumar, Resident Of House No. 133, Meghwala Pada, Dabla, Jaisalmer.
(Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (48 of 84) [SAW-256/2023]
11. Mohammad Aasif S/o Abdul Rseed, Resident Of B-971, Bhatta Basti, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur.
12. Sunil Kumar S/o Shri Mahendra Singh, Dabri, Hanumangarh, Rajasthan.
13. Khagesh Sharma S/o Shri Surendra Kumar Sharma, Resident Of Arya Samaj Gali, Deeg, Bharatpur.
14. Ram Lal S/o Shri Prem Das, Resident Of 2 Bpsm, Ganganagar, Rajasthan.
15. Roshan Kumar S/o Shri Kashi Ram, Resident Of Manpura Bas, Bhalau Teeba, Bhalau Tal, Churu.
16. Lalit Jangid S/o Shri Shishpal Jangid, Resident Of Navadera Chourya, Ratanpur Road, Dungarpur, Rajasthan.
17. Magram Poonar S/o Shri Tikku Ram Poonar, Resident Of B-
106, Shankar Nagar, Jhawar Road, Jodhpur.
18. Narendra Saini S/o Bharat Singh Saini, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Swami Dayanand Nagar, Ward No.4, Tijara, District Alwar, Rajasthan.
19. Dashrath Singh S/o Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o 53/151, Badrinath Colony, Sagar Road, Amer, Jaipur (Raj.)
20. Bhupendra Singh S/o Om Prakash, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Vpo Bachhrain, Tehsil Weir, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan.
21. Pankaj Kumar S/o Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Bhootoli District Bharatpur 321642
22. Ravin Shekhawat S/o Padam Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Karni Colony Ajeetgarh, Tehsil Srimadopur, District Sikar, Rajasthan-332701.
23. Bharat Bhushan Pandey S/o Suresh Chand Pandey, Aged About 34 Years, R/o 588A, Sukya Nagar, Gopalpura Bye Pass, Jaipur (Raj.)
24. Prahlad Singh Achara Son Of Shri Phool Singh Achara, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Shahpura, Thikaraiya, District Sikar (Rajasthan) (Roll No. 406926)
25. Naresh Kumar Son Of Shri Kishana Ram, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Daudsor, Tehsil Didwana, District Nagaur (Rajasthan) (Roll No. 402192) (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (49 of 84) [SAW-256/2023]
26. Krishna Pal Singh Rathore Son Of Shri Narendra Singh Rathore, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of 197, Bemlavaya, Kuradabad Kuraear, Kurawar Girwa District Udaipur (Roll No. 505553)
----Respondents D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 382/2023 Chaturbhuj Sharma S/o Shri Vishnu Dutt Sharma, Aged About 33 Years, Resident Of Lig, B-42, Ahinsa Marg, Panchsheel, Ajmer, District Ajmer.
----Appellant Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principle Secretary, Transport Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, State Agriculture Management Institution Campus, Durgapura, Jaipur
3. Yogendra Kumar Agarwal Son Of Deen Dayal Agarwal, Aged About 42 Years, Resident Of Old Bayana Bus Stand, Neemda Gate, Bharatpur (Raj.).
4. Laxman Singh Bhati Son Of Shri Shiv Singh Bhati, Aged About 36 Years, Resident Of Flat No. 6156, Block-40, Rangoli Garden Panchyawala, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.).
5. Tejbhan Singh Son Of Rasal Singh, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of Near 54, Cimmco Nagla, Tej Singh, Bharatpur (Raj.).
6. Meenakshi Sharma Wife Of Shri Kamal Kumar Mishra, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Plot No. A-19, Aravali Vihar, Vivekanand Colony, Dausakhurd, Dausa (Raj.).
----Respondents D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 450/2023 State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Transport, Secretariat, Jaipur.
----Appellant Versus
1. Manish Kumar Aloria S/o Shri Kailash Chand Aloria, Resident Of Samod Jaipur.
2. Ramkesh Choudhary S/o Shri Shyoji Lal Choudhary, (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (50 of 84) [SAW-256/2023] Resident Of In Front Of Bade Hospital, Nainwa, Bundi.
3. Virendra Singh S/o Shri Balveer Singh Gurjar, Resident Of Jagdishpura, Karauli, Rajasthan.
4. Hansraj Sidh S/o Shri Bhagwan Nath Sidh, Resident Of Sidho Ka Bass, Vpo Benisar Tehsil Shridungargarh, Bikaner.
5. Samaksh Bhardwaj S/o Shri Ramavtar Bhardwaj, Resident Of Plot No. 30-A, Pratap Nagar, Old Ramgarh Mod, Jaipur.
6. Manjeet Singh S/o Shri Harphool Singh, Resident Of Ward No. 13, Jhunjhunu.
7. Yudhishthar S/o Shri Devendra Kumar, Resident Of House No. 133, Meghwala Pada, Dabla, Jaisalmer.
8. Mohammad Aasif S/o Abdul Rseed, Resident Of B-971, Bhatta Basti, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur.
9. Sunil Kumar S/o Shri Mahendra Singh, Dabri, Hanumangarh, Rajasthan.
10. Khagesh Sharma S/o Shri Surendra Kumar Sharma, Resident Of Arya Samaj Gali, Deeg, Bharatpur.
11. Ram Lal S/o Shri Prem Das, Resident Of 2 Bpsm, Ganganagar, Rajasthan.
12. Roshan Kumar S/o Shri Kashi Ram, Resident Of Manpura Bas, Bhalau Teeba, Bhalau Tal, Churu.
13. Lalit Jangid S/o Shri Shishpal Jangid, Resident Of Navadera Chourya, Ratanpur Road, Dungarpur, Rajasthan.
14. Magram Poonar S/o Shri Tikku Ram Poonar, Resident Of B-
106, Shankar Nagar, Jhawar Road, Jodhpur.
15. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, (Rssb), Through Its Secretary, State Agriculture Management Institution Campus, Durgapura, Jaipur.
16. Ravin Shekhawat S/o Padam Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Karni Colony Ajeetgarh, Tehsil Srimadopur, District Sikar, Rajasthan-332701.
17. Narendra Saini S/o Bharat Singh Saini, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Swami Dayanand Nagar, Ward No.4, Tijara, District Alwar (Raj.)
18. Bharat Bhushan Pandey S/o Suresh Chand Pandey, Aged About 34 Years, R/o 588A, Sukya Nagar, Gopalpura Bye Pass, Jaipur (Raj.) (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (51 of 84) [SAW-256/2023]
19. Dashrath Singh S/o Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o 53/151, Badrinath Colony, Sagar Road, Amer, Jaipur (Raj.)
20. Bhupendra Singh S/o Om Prakash, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Vpo Bachhrain, Tehsil Weir, District Bharatpur (Raj.)
21. Pankaj Kumar S/o Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Bhootoli District Bharatpur 321642
22. Prahlad Singh Achara Son Of Shri Phool Singh Achara, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Shahpura, Thikaraiya, District Sikar (Rajasthan) (Roll No. 406926)
23. Naresh Kumar Son Of Shri Kishana Ram, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Daudsor, Tehsil Didwana, District Nagaur (Rajasthan) (Roll No. 402192)
24. Krishna Pal Singh Rathore Son Of Shri Narendra Singh Rathore, Resident Of 197, Bemlavaya, Kuradabad Kuraear, Kurawar Girwa District Udaipur (Roll No. 505553)
25. The Principal Secretary, To Government, Department Of Personal, Main Building, Secretariat, Jaipur.
----Respondents D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 463/2023
1. Sharwan Kumar S/o Lala Ram, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 3, Meno Ka Vass, Near Bus Stand, Malnoo, Pali, Rajasthan
2. Pooja Sharma S/o Dinesh Chand Sharma, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of 10/273, Sector No. 10, Malviya Nagar, Ward No. 37, Jaipur, Rajasthan
3. Mukesh Kumar Meena S/o Sanwar Mal Meena, Aged About 33 Years, Resident Of Anoppura, Jaipur, Rajasthan
4. Rohit Panwar S/o Leeladhar Panwar, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of Gali No.4, Rampura Basti, Lalgarh, Bikaner, Rajasthan.
----Appellants Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Transport, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, (Rssb), Through Its Secretary, State Agriculture Management Institution (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (52 of 84) [SAW-256/2023] Campus, Durgapura, Jaipur.
3. The Principal Secretary, To Government, Department Of Personal, Main Building, Secretariat, Jaipur.
4. Manish Kumar Aloria S/o Shri Kailash Chand Aloria, Resident Of Samod, Jaipur.
5. Ramkesh Choudhary S/o Shri Shyoji Lal Choudhary, Resident Of In Front Of Bade Hospital, Nainwa, Bundi.
6. Virendra Singh S/o Shri Balveer Singh Gurjar, Resident Of Jagdishpura, Karauli, Rajasthan.
7. Hansraj Sidh S/o Shri Bhagwan Nath Sidh, Resident Of Sidho Ka Bass, Vpo Benisar Tehsil Shridungargarh, Bikaner.
8. Samaksh Bhardwaj S/o Shri Ramavtar Bhardwaj, Resident Of Plot No. 30-A, Pratap Nagar, Old Ramgarh Mod, Jaipur.
9. Manjeet Singh S/o Shri Harphool Singh, Resident Of Ward No. 13, Jhunjhunu.
10. Yudhishthar S/o Shri Devendra Kumar, Resident Of House No. 133, Meghwala Pada, Dabla, Jaisalmer.
11. Mohammad Aasif S/o Abdul Rseed, Resident Of B-971, Bhatta Basti, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur.
12. Sunil Kumar S/o Shri Mahendra Singh, Dabri, Hanumangarh, Rajasthan.
13. Khagesh Sharma S/o Shri Surendra Kumar Sharma, Resident Of Arya Samaj Gali, Deeg, Bharatpur.
14. Ram Lal S/o Shri Prem Das, Resident Of 2 Bpsm, Ganganagar, Rajasthan.
15. Roshan Kumar S/o Shri Kashi Ram, Resident Of Manpura Bas, Bhalau Teeba, Bhalau Tal, Churu.
16. Lalit Jangid S/o Shri Shishpal Jangid, Resident Of Navadera Chourva, Ratanpur Road, Dungarpur, Rajasthan.
17. Magram Poonar S/o Shri Tikku Ram Poonar, Resident Of B-
106, Shankar Nagar, Jhawar Road, Jodhpur.
18. Bharat Bhushan Pandey S/o Suresh Chand Pandey, Aged About 34 Years, R/o 588A, Sukva Nagar, Gopalpura Bye Pass, Jaipur (Raj.)
19. Dashrath Singh S/o Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o 53/151, Badrinath Colony, Sagar Road, Amer, Jaipur (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (53 of 84) [SAW-256/2023] (Raj.)
20. Pankaj Kumar S/o Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Bhootoli District Bharatpur 321642
21. Bhupendra Singh Son Of Shri Om Prakash, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Village Post Bachhren, Tehsil Bhusawar, District Bharatpur (Roll No. 4011358).
22. Narendra Saini Son Of Shri Bharat Singh Saini, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Swami Dayanand Nagar, Ward No. 4, Tijara District Alwar (Roll No. 405459)
23. Prahlad Singh Achara Son Of Shri Phool Singh Achara, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Shahpura, Thikaraiya, District Sikar (Rajasthan) (Roll No. 406926)
24. Naresh Kumar Son Of Shri Kishana Ram, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Daudsor, Tehsil Didwana, District Nagaur (Rajasthan) (Roll No. 402192)
25. Krishna Pal Singh Rathore Son Of Shri Narendra Singh Rathore, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of 197, Bemlavaya, Kuradabad Kuraear, Kurawar Girwa District Udaipur (Roll No. 505553)
26. Ravin Shekhawat S/o Padam Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Karni Colony Ajeetgarh, Tehsil Srimadopur, District Sikar, Rajasthan-332701.
----Respondents D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 469/2023
1. Mahendra Singh Kasana S/o Shri Kailash Chand Kasana, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Kesharpur, District Alwar, Rajasthan - 301001.
2. Ankit Sharma S/o Shri Babulal Sharma, Aged About 32 Years, R/o C-174, Vishwakarma Colony, Tijara Phatak, District Alwar, Rajasthan- 301001.
3. Abhishek Jaiman S/o Shri Rajesh Jaiman, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Jain Mandir Mohalla, Moujpur, District Alwar, Rajasthan- 321633.
----Appellants Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Transport, Secretariat, Jaipur.
(Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (54 of 84) [SAW-256/2023]
2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, (Rssb), Through Its Secretary, State Agriculture Management Institution Campus, Durgapura, Jaipur.
3. The Principal Secretary, To Government, Department Of Personal, Main Building, Secretariat, Jaipur.
4. Manish Kumar Aloria S/o Shri Kailash Chand Aloria, Resident Of Samod, Jaipur.
5. Ramkesh Choudhary S/o Shri Shyoji Lal Choudhary, Resident Of In Front Of Bade Hospital, Nainwa, Bundi.
6. Virendra Singh S/o Shri Balveer Singh Gurjar, Resident Of Jagdishpura, Karauli, Rajasthan.
7. Hansraj Sidh S/o Shri Bhagwan Nath Sidh, Resident Of Sidho Ka Bass, Vpo Benisar Tehsil Shridungargarh, Bikaner.
8. Samaksh Bhardwaj S/o Shri Ramavtar Bhardwaj, Resident Of Plot No. 30-A, Pratap Nagar, Old Ramgarh Mod, Jaipur.
9. Manjeet Singh S/o Shri Harphool Singh, Resident Of Ward No. 13, Jhunjhunu.
10. Yudhishthar S/o Shri Devendra Kumar, Resident Of House No. 133, Meghwala Pada, Dabla, Jaisalmer.
11. Mohammad Aasif S/o Abdul Rseed, Resident Of B-971, Bhatta Basti, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur.
12. Sunil Kumar S/o Shri Mahendra Singh, Dabri, Hanumangarh, Rajasthan.
13. Khagesh Sharma S/o Shri Surendra Kumar Sharma, Resident Of Arya Samaj Gali, Deeg, Bharatpur.
14. Ram Lal S/o Shri Prem Das, Resident Of 2 Bpsm, Ganganagar, Rajasthan.
15. Roshan Kumar S/o Shri Kashi Ram, Resident Of Manpura Bas, Bhalau Teeba, Bhalau Tal, Churu.
16. Lalit Jangid S/o Shri Shishpal Jangid, Resident Of Navadera Chourya, Ratanpur Road, Dungarpur, Rajasthan.
17. Magram Poonar S/o Shri Tikku Ram Poonar, Resident Of B-
106, Shankar Nagar, Jhawar Road, Jodhpur.
18. Ravin Shekhawat S/o Padam Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Karni Colony Ajeetgarh, Tehsil Srimadopur, District Sikar, Rajasthan-332701.
(Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (55 of 84) [SAW-256/2023]
19. Bharat Bhushan Pandey S/o Suresh Chand Pandey, R/o 588A, Sukya Nagar, Gopalpura Bye Pass, Jaipur (Raj.)
20. Dashrath Singh S/o Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o 53/151, Badrinath Colony, Sagar Road, Amer, Jaipur (Raj.)
21. Pankaj Kumar S/o Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Bhootoli District Bharatpur 321642
22. Bhupendra Singh S/o Om Prakash, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Vpo Bachhrain, Tehsil Weir, District Bharatpur (Raj.) (Roll No. 4011358)
23. Narendra Saini S/o Bharat Singh Saini, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Swami Dayanand Nagar, Ward No.4, Tijara, District Alwar (Raj.) (Roll No. 405459)
24. Prahlad Singh Achara Son Of Shri Phool Singh Achara, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Shahpura, Thikaraiya, District Sikar (Rajasthan) (Roll No. 406926)
25. Naresh Kumar Son Of Shri Kishana Ram, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Daudsor, Tehsil Didwana, District Nagaur (Rajasthan) (Roll No. 402192)
26. Krishna Pal Singh Rathore Son Of Shri Narendra Singh Rathore, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of 197, Bemlavaya, Kuradabad Kuraear, Kurawar Girwa District Udaipur (Roll No. 505553)
----Respondents D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 532/2023 Bharat Sonagara S/o Shri Amolak Chand Sonagara, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Outside Chandpole, Sonagara Bhawan, Jodhpur (Raj.)
----Appellant Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Transport Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, State Agriculture Management Institution Campus, Durgapura, Jaipur.
3. Yogendra Kumar Agarwal S/o Deen Dayal Agarwal, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Old Bayana Bus Stand, Neemda Gate, (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (56 of 84) [SAW-256/2023] Bharatpur (Raj.).
4. Laxman Singh Bhati S/o Shiv Singh Bhati, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Flat No. 6156, Block -40, Rangoli Garden Panchyawala, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.).
5. Tejbhan Singh S/o Rasal Singh, Aged About 35 Years, R/o 54, Near Cimmco Nagla, Tej Singh, Bharatpur (Raj.).
6. Meenakshi Sharma W/o Kamal Kumar Mishra, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Plot No. A-19, Aravali Vihar, Vivekanand Colony, Dausa Khurd, Dausa (Raj.).
----Respondents D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 927/2023 Mohammad Zuber Khan S/o Mohammad Zafar Khan, Aged About 34 Years, R/o L-5, Gandhi Nagar, Mullatalai, District Udaipur, Rajasthan.
----Appellant Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Transport, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, (Rssb), Through Its Secretary, State Agriculture Management Institution Campus, Durgapura, Jaipur.
3. The Principal Secretary, To Government, Department Of Personal, Main Building, Secretariat, Jaipur.
4. Manish Kumar Aloria S/o Shri Kailash Chand Aloria, Resident Of Samod, Jaipur.
5. Ramkesh Choudhary S/o Shri Shyoji Lal Choudhary, Resident Of In Front Of Bade Hospital, Nainwa, Bundi.
6. Virendra Singh S/o Shri Balveer Singh Gurjar, Resident Of Jagdishpura, Karauli, Rajasthan.
7. Hansraj Sidh S/o Shri Bhagwan Nath Sidh, Resident Of Sidho Ka Bass, Vpo Benisar Tehsil Shridungargarh, Bikaner.
8. Samaksh Bhardwaj S/o Shri Ramavtar Bhardwaj, Resident Of Plot No. 30-A, Pratap Nagar, Old Ramgarh Mod, Jaipur.
9. Manjeet Singh S/o Shri Harphool Singh, Resident Of Ward No. 13, Jhunjhunu.
10. Yudhishthar S/o Shri Devendra Kumar, Resident Of House (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (57 of 84) [SAW-256/2023] No. 133, Meghwala Pada, Dabla, Jaisalmer.
11. Mohammad Aasif S/o Abdul Rseed, Resident Of B-971, Bhatta Basti, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur.
12. Sunil Kumar S/o Shri Mahendra Singh, Dabri, Hanumangarh, Rajasthan.
13. Khagesh Sharma S/o Shri Surendra Kumar Sharma, Resident Of Arya Samaj Gali, Deeg, Bharatpur.
14. Ram Lal S/o Shri Prem Das, Resident Of 2 Bpsm, Ganganagar, Rajasthan.
15. Roshan Kumar S/o Shri Kashi Ram, Resident Of Manpura Bas, Bhalau Teeba, Bhalau Tal, Churu.
16. Lalit Jangid S/o Shri Shishpal Jangid, Resident Of Navadera Chourya, Ratanpur Road, Dungarpur, Rajasthan.
17. Magram Poonar S/o Shri Tikku Ram Poonar, Resident Of B-
106, Shankar Nagar, Jhawar Road, Jodhpur.
18. Ravin Shekhawat S/o Shri Padam Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Karni Colony Ajeetgarh, Tehsil Srimadopur, District Sikar, Rajasthan-332701.
19. Narendra Saini S/o Bharat Singh Saini, R/o Swami Dayanand Nagar, Ward No.4, Tijara, District Alwar, Rajasthan.
20. Bharat Bhushan Pandey S/o Suresh Chand Pandey, Aged About 34 Years, R/o 588A, Sukya Nagar, Gopalpura Byepass, Jaipur (Raj.)
21. Dashrath Singh S/o Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o 53/151, Badrinath Colony, Sagar Road, Amer, Jaipur (Raj.)
22. Bhupendra Singh S/o Om Prakash, R/o Vpo Bachhrain, Tehsil Weir, District Bharatpur (Raj.)
23. Pankaj Kumar S/o Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Bhootoli District Bharatpur 321642
24. Prahlad Singh Achara Son Of Shri Phool Singh Achara, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Shahpura, Thikaraiya, District Sikar (Rajasthan) (Roll No. 406926)
25. Naresh Kumar Son Of Shri Kishana Ram, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Daudsor, Tehsil Didwana, District Nagaur (Rajasthan) (Roll No. 402192) (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (58 of 84) [SAW-256/2023]
26. Krishna Pal Singh Rathore Son Of Shri Narendra Singh Rathore, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of 197, Bemlavaya, Kuradabad Kuraear, Kurawar Girwa District Udaipur (Roll No. 505553)
----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. R.N. Mathur, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Utkarsh Dubey Mr. Akshit Gupta with Ms. Pragya Seth, Mr. Kamlesh Sharma, Mr. Shreyansh Dhariwal & Mr. Nakul Bansal.
Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG with Mr. Divanshu Gupta, AGC, Mr. Sachin Singh Rathore, AAAG, Mr. Anshuman Singh, Mr. Tanishq A. Parmar, Mr. Jitendra Kumar Takar & Mr. Indo Rathore Mr. Atul Bhardwaj Mr. Shivang Khandelwal on behalf of Dr. T.N. Sharma Mr. Devendra Sharma on behalf of Mr. Bal Ram Vashisth Mr. Tanveer Ahamad with Mr. Iliyas Khan Mr. Ajatshatru Mina with Mr. Himanshu Kala, Mr. Movil Jeenwal & Mr. Rajat Choudhary.
Mr. Himanshu Jain with Mr. Rishi Raj Maheshwari, Ms. Apoorva Agarwal, Mr. Yashraj Kumawat & Mr. Avinash Bhardwaj.
Mr. Anoop Pareek with Mr. Kshitiz Sharma & Mr. Pranav Pareek Mr. N.C. Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. A.K. Sharma, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Ashwinee Kumar Jaiman, Mr. Rachit Sharma, Mr. Madhav Dadhich Mr. Keshav Parashar, Mr. Moin Khan & Mr. Ashish Kabra Mr. Sunil Samdaria with Mr. Arihant Samdaria Mr. M.F. Baig with (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (59 of 84) [SAW-256/2023] Mr. Govind Gupta Mr. Munesh Bhardwaj Mr. Nalin G. Narain, through VC with Mr. Manish Bhardwaj & Mr. Devranjan Singh Shekhawat HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA JUDGMENT Date of conclusion of arguments : 07/05/2026 Date on which judgment was reserved : 07/05/2026 Whether the full judgment or only the operative part is pronounced : Full Judgment Date of pronouncement : 21st/05/2026 (Per Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice)
1. These D.B. Special Appeals are filed challenging the judgment passed by the learned Single Judge, whereby he allowed a bunch of writ petitions on 22.02.2023 and held as under:-
"54. As a result, the instant writ petitions are hereby allowed. The impugned office order dated 15.12.2021 issued by the RSSB is quashed. Respondent-RSSB is directed to prepare the final result on merit for the post of Motor Vehicle Sub- Inspector, pursuant to advertisement dated 24.11.2021, excluding degree holders in automobile/mechanical engineering and the appointment be given by the State as per merit list in accordance with law.
It is made clear that candidate(s) participated in the present recruitment process, possessing degree in automobile/mechanical engineering, if has/have already undergone to the diploma course and had acquired qualification of diploma in automobile/mechanical engineering, as per the prescribed norms of qualification in the advertisement dated 24.11.2021, shall be considered on merits. No costs."
Facts:-
2. The facts of the case are that an Advertisement was issued on 24.11.2021 by the Rajasthan Staff Selection Board (hereinafter referred to as 'RSSB') inviting applications for appointment on the post of Motor Vehicle Sub-Inspector. An office order was issued thereafter on 15.12.2021 by the RSSB enabling the candidates (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (60 of 84) [SAW-256/2023] possessing higher qualification than the requisite qualification to apply and to be treated as eligible to participate in the selection process. So far as the Motor Vehicle Sub-Inspector post is concerned, the same is to be filed in terms of the Schedule appended to the Rajasthan Transport Subordinate Service Rules, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules of 1963') which provides as under:-
SCHEDULE Name of Source of Qualification Post from Minimum Post Recruitment for direct which experience with recruitment appointment and percentage by qualification promotion is required for to be made promotion 1 2 3 4 5 Motor 100% by Motor Vehicle 5 Years Vehicle promotion Sub- experience on Inspector Inspector the post of mentioned in Column No.4 Motor 25% by 1. Must have Lover Confirmed Vehicle promotion passed Division LDC Sub- 75% by Secondary Clerks of possessing Inspector direct examination Transport diploma or recruitment of a Department certificate in recognized automobile Deleted board; Deleted Engg.
2. A diploma Recognized by 100% by in automobile the Govt. of direct Engineering Rajasthan recruitment (3 year's Or course) or a Who have diploma in passed a Mechanical departmental Engineering examination awarded by in automobile the State Engineering Board of prescribed by Technical the Transport Examination Department (3 years or the course) Government Or of Rajasthan Any qualification Deleted in either of the above disciplines declared equivalent by the Central (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (61 of 84) [SAW-256/2023] Government or State Government and.........
Note- It is indicated in the letter of DOP dated 30.08.2022 that the Rules of 1963 have been amended vide notification dated 08.03.2018 and after amendment, the direct recruitment on the post of Motor Vehicle Sub Inspector is 100%, instead of 75%. Thus consequently, columns No.2, 4 & 5 have been accordingly amended/deleted.
3. Thus, a candidate as per Clause 7, of the Advertisement which was similar to the aforesaid Schedule, was required to possess Class 10th qualification and three years Diploma in Mechanical Engineering/ Automobile Engineering Course from Government of India or State Government or any qualification either of the above disciplines declared equivalent by the Central Government or State Government. The candidate was further required to have one year experience in reputed Automobile Workshop for petrol and diesel engine of Light/ Heavy Vehicle and repairing. He was further required to possess a Driving License of Motorcycle, Heavy Vehicle License and Passenger Vehicle License as issued from competent authority. The level of examination was mentioned to be that of Secondary/ Technical Diploma.
4. The writ petitioners filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 15.12.2021 issued by the RSSB, whereby, it allowed candidates having higher academic qualifications than the three year mechanical engineering/ automobile engineering diploma to participate in the selection. During the pendency of writ petition, the result was declared.
5. The Department of Personnel (hereinafter referred to as 'DOP') gave its opinion that persons possessing higher qualification are eligible for recruitment on the post of Motor Vehicle Sub-Inspector. Vide order dated 03.08.2022, the same (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (62 of 84) [SAW-256/2023] was therefore, also challenged by the writ petitioners by amending the writ petitions.
6. The appellants who had participated in the selection process and cleared the examination were impleaded as respondent Nos.3 to 8 in one of the Writ Petitions bearing No.382/2022 and a reply was filed by them supporting the stand taken by the RSSB as well as by the State.
7. The State Government filed its reply to the writ petition and the writ petition was objected on the ground of maintainability stating that once the writ petitioners had participated in the selection process, they could not have challenged the selection as well as the conditions laid down by the RSSB regarding eligibility.
In support of their decision for allowing candidates having higher qualifications, the State in its reply submitted that the corrigendum of educational qualification allowing higher qualification like B.Tech, M.Tech as eligible qualification for applying for the post was in consonance with the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter 'the Act of 1988') and the RSSB had sought guidance from the Department of Higher Qualification.
8. It was further submitted that earlier in the examination of Motor Vehicle held in 2013 by the Rajasthan Public Service Commission (hereinafter referred to as 'RPSC'), guidance was sought from the Department of Higher Qualification. On 04.09.2015 it was stated that a higher qualification than three year diploma may be considered as sufficient for fulfilling the eligibility criteria. It was also stated that even prior to the Advertisement of 24.11.2021, candidates having higher (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (63 of 84) [SAW-256/2023] qualification of degree in Automobile Engineering or Mechanical Engineering, were allowed to participate in the selections.
9. It was further submitted that while there can be a minimum qualification laid down under the Rules, as candidates having higher qualification cannot be deprived from participation and would be therefore eligible to apply.
10. Section 213(1) of the Act of 1988 empowers the State Government to create a Transport Department and appoint Officers, as it thinks fit, as Transport Officers. The State Government may accept the qualifications or prescribed higher qualifications while framing Rules under the proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution and regarding such existing power, it cannot be said that the corrigendum issued to the Advertisement was unjustified. They have also relied on the judgment passed in the case of S. Satyapal Reddy And Others vs Govt. Of A.P. And Others1 wherein the Apex Court held that the State Government has the power to prescribe qualifications higher than that laid down by the Central Government.
11. It was further submitted that the degree in Mechanical/ Automobile Engineering is a higher qualification as compared to a three year Diploma in Mechanical and Automobile Engineering and would, therefore, be eligible to participate in the selection process.
The learned Single Judge, however, rejected the argument advanced before it. Hence, the present appeals.
Submissions Of The Parties:-
12. Learned Senior Counsel for the appellants, along with their assisting counsels, made the following submissions:-
1 (1994) 4 SCC 391 (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (64 of 84) [SAW-256/2023] 12.1. The Single Bench while deciding the first issue has seriously erred in holding that the ratio of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of S. Satyapal Reddy (supra) would have been applicable in the present case only, if the State Government itself has prescribed the qualification of Degree in Automobile / Mechanical Engineering, as higher qualification and eligibility alongwith diploma in Automobile, Mechanical Engineering, either in the advertisement dated 24.11.2021 itself while initiating recruitment process, or in the statutory rules by way of passing separate notifications. In this reference, it is stated that the learned Single Judge has failed to consider that the State Government, in the past recruitments, also for the post of Motor Vehicle Sub Inspector which were conducted through the RPSC has informed to treat a higher qualified person as eligible. Thus, when such has been the past practice under the same Rules for the same post to treat higher qualified persons like degree holders in the same faculty Automobile/ Mechanical Engineering as eligible, it was not required for the State Government to pass any fresh or separate order for the recruitment of 2021 also.
12.2 The learned Single Judge while deciding the first issue has seriously erred in holding that the stand of the State Government to treat degree holders in Automobile/ Mechanical Engineering as eligible (being higher qualified) cannot be relied upon, because during the course of writ petition the DOP has issued a letter dated 30.08.2022 and Equivalence Committee has given its report dated 14.10.2021 in compliance with directions of this Court vide order dated 20.09.2022. When the Commission by virtue of the letter dated 04.09.2015 issued by the Department of Transport (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (65 of 84) [SAW-256/2023] has treated degree holders as eligible for recruitment on the post of Motor Vehicle Sub Inspector, the Board has only followed the same process by issuance of office order dated 15.12.2021. In these circumstances, when by way of a writ petition, a challenge was made to the eligibility granted to degree holders for the post of Motor Vehicle Sub Inspector being against the qualification prescribed under Rule 11 read with Schedule I of the Rules of 1963. This Court by way of its order dated 03.08.2022, invoking Rule 36 of the Rules of 1963 sought opinion from the DOP to this effect. The aforesaid letter of the DOP dated 30.08.2022, therefore, provides interpretation to the qualification prescribed for the post of Motor Vehicle Sub Inspector under the Rules of 1963 which also allow higher qualified persons as eligible, the same was also the past practice in respect to the recruitment of Motor Vehicle Sub Inspector as was reflected in the letter dated 04.09.2015 issued by the Department of Transport.
12.3 The learned Single Judge while deciding the first issue, has also committed an illegality in mis-applying the ratio of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Jyoti K.K. And Others vs Kerala Public Service Commission And Others2, wherein, the controversy before the Hon'ble Supreme Court was whether the persons holding Degree in electrical engineering can be treated as eligible for holding the higher qualification. To answer the aforesaid question, the Hon'ble Supreme Court had held that whenever a person acquired higher qualification in the same faculty, such qualification can certainly stated to presuppose the acquisition of the lower qualification 2 (2010) 15 SCC 596 (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (66 of 84) [SAW-256/2023] prescribed for the post. Therefore, the case of Jyoti K.K. (supra) was applicable in the present case, however, in the case of S. Satyapal Reddy (supra) the Hon'ble Supreme Court had already held that graduation in mechanical engineering is one of the higher qualification than diploma in Mechanical Engineering. Even in the case of Jyoti K.K. (supra) itself, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that a degree in electrical engineering has to be treated as a higher qualification than Diploma in Electrical Engineering.
Thus, the gist of the aforesaid judgments in the case of S. Satyapal Reddy (supra) and Jyoti K.K. (supra) makes it crystal clear that a degree in engineering is a higher qualification than diploma in engineering when such degree in engineering is in the same faculty as it presupposes acquisition of the lower qualification.
12.4 The learned Single Judge has seriously erred in not relying upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Parvaiz Ahmad Parry vs State of Jammu And Kashmir And Others 3, it is stated that there is no dispute that diploma in engineering and B.Tech in Engineering are two different courses. The dispute is whether the degree holders in the same faculty of engineering can be treated eligible on the ground of presupposing the acquisition of lower qualification of diploma in engineering under the same faculty. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of S. Satyapal Reddy (supra) while dealing with the case of Motor Vehicle Sub Inspector with the qualification of degree in mechanical engineering and where the qualification prescribed was diploma in Mechanical Engineering and in the case of Jyoti K.K. (supra) for 3 (2015) 17 SCC 709 (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (67 of 84) [SAW-256/2023] recruitment on the post of Sub Engineering Electrical while dealing with the case of degree holders in electrical engineering where the qualification prescribed was diploma in electrical engineering, has already held that degrees shall be treated to be a higher qualification than diploma for being in the same faculty.
12.5 The learned Single Judge has seriously erred in holding that judgment of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir in the case of S. Gurmeet Singh And Others vs State And Others. 4 was not covering the facts of the present case and judgment was given in the peculiar facts of that case alone even when the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir was dealing with same controversy for the post of Motor Vehicle Sub Inspector in respect to the eligibility to the degree holders in Automobile/ Mechanical Engineering when the advertisement prescribed qualification only of diploma in Automobile/ Mechanical Engineering as eligibility. Hence, the impugned judgment dated 22.02.2023 passed by learned Single Judge deserves to be quashed and set aside.
12.6 The learned Single Judge has seriously erred in not relying upon judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Puneet Sharma And Others vs Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board Limited And Another5, even when in the aforesaid judgment candidates possessing degree in the same faculty were held to be eligible.
12.7 The learned Single Judge has seriously erred in relying upon judgments of the Full Bench of Allahabad High Court in the case of Deepak Singh vs State of U.P.6 and Abhishek Sharma And 4 (2008) 1 JKJ 68 5 2021 SCC Online SC 291 6 2019 SCC Online All 4471 (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (68 of 84) [SAW-256/2023] Others vs State of U.P. And Others7 wherein the Court has relied upon the case of Zahoor Ahmad Rather And Others vs Sheikh Imtiyaz Ahmad And Others8 for the reason that like in the State of Allahabad, in the State of Jammu & Kashmir also in the case of Zahoor Ahmad Rather (supra), it was held that it is the employers right to adjudge the eligibility. Thus, the ratio of the judgment in the case of Zahoor Ahmad Rather (supra) was that it is the State who has to decide the eligibility and the powers of judicial review cannot be exercised. When the aforesaid issue is applied in the present case, as the State has treated higher qualified persons as eligible, therefore, the case of Deepak Singh (supra) and Abhishek Sharma (supra) could not have been applied in the present matter.
12.8 The learned Single Judge while deciding the second issue has erred in holding that it would not be permissible for the Court to draw an inference that higher qualification necessarily presupposes the acquisition of another, albeit lower qualification and it is not part of the role or function of judicial review to expand upon the ambit of the prescribed qualification. It is pertinent to mention here that the appellants never pleaded before learned Single Judge to draw an inference that higher qualification presupposes the acquisition of another. On the contrary, the State Government in past recruitments (also for the post of Motor Vehicle Sub Inspector which were conducted through RPSC), has informed the RPSC to treat higher qualified person as eligible. Thus, when such has been the past practice under the 7 Judgment passed by the Allahabad High Court in Writ-A No.10266/2018, decision dated 27th April 2022 8 (2019) 2 SCC 404 (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (69 of 84) [SAW-256/2023] same Rules for the same post to treat higher qualified persons like degree holders in the same faculty of Automobile/ Mechanical Engineering as eligible, it was not required to draw any inference.
12.9 The learned Single Judge while deciding the second issue has erred in not relying upon the expert committee report dated 14.10.2022. The learned Single Judge has not appreciated the fact that the learned Single Judge considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners directed the Secretary, DOP to place the matter before the Equivalence Committee to be constituted in pursuance to the circulars dated 18.10.2021 with regard to eligibility of candidates who are having degree of Mechanical/ Automobile Engineering for appointment on the post of Motor Vehicle Sub Inspector. The Equivalence Committee submitted its report to the effect that candidates possessing degree in Automobile/ Mechanical engineering are eligible for the post of Motor Vehicle Sub Inspector.
12.10 The learned Single Judge while deciding the second issue has erred in holding that the ratio of judgment in the case of Zahoor Ahmad Rather (supra) stands in favour of diploma holders as in DOP letter dated 30.08.2022 as well as in report dated 14.10.2022 submitted by the Equivalence Committee, there is no finding to the effect that a degree in automobile/ mechanical engineering necessarily presupposes the acquisition of the qualification of diploma in the same discipline and there is no finding that degree should be treated as equivalent to the diploma in the discipline of automobile / mechanical engineering. The ratio of the judgment in the case of Zahoor Ahmad Rather (supra) was that it is the State who has to decide the eligibility and the (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (70 of 84) [SAW-256/2023] powers of judicial review cannot be exercised and when the aforesaid issue is applied in the present case, the State has treated higher qualified persons holding the qualification of Degree in Automobile /Mechanical Engineering as eligible.
12.11 The learned Single Judge while deciding the second issue has erred in holding that the rules of the game cannot be changed midway in the selection process. Once it has started, the letter dated 30.08.2022 of DOP cannot be made applicable to the present process of recruitment of Motor Vehicle Sub Inspector. The aforesaid letter of the DOP dated 30.08.2022, therefore, provides interpretation regarding the qualification prescribed for the post of Motor Vehicle Sub Inspector under the Rules of 1963 which also allows higher qualified persons to be eligible which was also the past practice in respect to the recruitment of Motor Vehicle Sub Inspector as was reflected in the letter dated 04.09.2015 issued by the Department of Transport and thus, the learned Single Judge committed an error in holding that the rules of game have been changed after it has started.
12.12 The learned Single Judge while deciding the second issue has erred in holding that the ratio of Ajith K. And Others vs Aneesh K.S. And Others9, shall be applicable to the facts of the present case. The aforesaid case shall not be applicable as in the instant case there has been determination of equivalence by the Expert Committee formed by the learned Single Judge on the application moved by private respondents. Also, private respondents have not challenged the order dated 15.12.2021 on 9 (2019) 17 SCC 147 (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (71 of 84) [SAW-256/2023] the ground that the candidates with higher qualification cannot be treated as eligible even on presupposing the lower qualification.
13. Learned Senior Counsel for the appellants, in support of their arguments, has placed reliance on the following judgments:-
a) Puneet Sharma And Others Etc (supra)
b) Ajit K. and Others (supra)
c) Jyoti K.K. (supra)
d) Parvaiz Ahmad Parry (supra)
e) Zahoor Ahmad Rather And Others (supra)
f) S. Satyapal Reddy and Others (supra)
g) Shri Chakrapani Das vs Sri Bhaskar Das And Others 10
h) Rajbir Singh And Others vs State of Punjab And Others11
i) Basanta Kumar Pait And Others vs The State of Assam And Others12
j) Ramnik Singh And Another vs UT of Jammu and Kashmir And Others13
k) Sri Pranab Majumder vs The State of Tripura And Others14
l) Nidhi Sharma And Others vs State of Haryana And Others15
14. Per contra, learned Senior Counsel for the respondents-writ petitioners, along with their assisting counsels, made the following submissions:-
14.1 The selection process for 197 posts of Motor Vehicle Sub-
Inspector was initiated vide Advertisement dated 24.11.2021. The office order dated 15.12.2021 (issued by the RSSB), enabling the candidates possessing higher qualification than the requisite 10 Judgment passed by High Court of Tripura in WA No.03/2017 dated 10.03.2020 11 Judgment passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana 2023:PHHC:070956 12 Judgment passed by the Gauhati High Court GAHC010126132022, 13 Judgment passed by the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh at Jammu in WP(C) No.2406/2021 dated 06.11.2023, 14 Judgment passed by the High Court of Tripura in WA No.09/2020 dated 31.03.2021 15 Judgment passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in LPA No.1861 of 2018 (O & M) and CWP No.8483 of 2021 decided on 11.05.2022.
(Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (72 of 84) [SAW-256/2023] qualification, was challenged by the diploma holders (writ petitioners).
14.2 Rule 11 of the Rules of 1963 deals with academic and Technical qualification which does not postulate that candidates who do not have basic qualification would be eligible.
14.3 There is no provision in the Rules of 1963 to consider degree in Automobile/ Mechanical Engineer as presupposing lower qualification. It is stated that the State Government has not chosen to amend the Rules of 1963 which have been framed in exercise of powers conferred by proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution of India and no amendment could have been prescribed by an administrative order which runs contrary to the statutory rules.
14.4 The Rules do not postulate the qualification as minimum qualification and therefore, the qualification prescribed under the schedule is the only qualification and no other qualification can be construed higher or equivalent contrary to the rules. Therefore, the order dated 15.12.2021 basically changed the rules of game.
14.5 The RSSB, being nodal agency to conduct the examination, could not have altered the qualifications on its own as prescribed by the statutory rules. Thus, the impugned order dated 15.12.2021 was beyond the competency and authority of the RSSB.
14.6 The inter-departmental communication in the previous recruitment cannot be construed as equivalence of qualification, as mandated under the Rules, as the Transport Department was not competent to declare any qualification as higher or equivalent.
(Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (73 of 84) [SAW-256/2023]
15. Learned Senior Counsel for the respondents in support of their arguments has placed reliance on the following judgments:-
a) Zahoor Ahmad Rather And Others vs Sheikh Imtiyaz Ahmad And Others (supra)
b) Prakash Chand Meena And Others vs State of Rajasthan And Others16
c) State of Punjab And Others vs Anita And Others17
d) Milind Shantilal Rathod and Others vs The State of Maharashtra Water Resource Department & Others18
e) Deepak Singh And Others vs State of U.P. & Others19
f) Pradeep Jangir vs State of Rajasthan And Others20
g) Manoj Kumar vs State of H.P. And Others21
h) Nishant Kumar And Another vs The State of Bihar & Others22
i) Nishant Kumar vs The State of Bihar And Others 23
j) Anoop M. And Others vs GireeshKumar T.M. And Others24
k) Md. Firoz Mansuri And Others vs The State of Bihar And Others25
l) Devender Bhaskar And Others vs State of Haryana And Others26
m) S. Gurmeet Singh And Others (supra)
16 (2015) 8 SCC 484 17 (2015) 2 SCC 170 18 Judgment passed by the Bombay High Court in Writ Petition No.8568/2022 on 30.01.2023. 19 Writ No.24273/2018 passed by the Allahabad High Court on 23.07.2019 20 Judgment passed by the Rajasthan High Court in D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No.1499/2019 on 17.02.2021 21 Judgment passed by the Himachal Pradesh High Court in CWP No.337/2020 on 13.03.2023 22 Judgment passed by the Patna High Court in S.B. Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9748/2020 decided on 23.11.2021 23 Judgment passed by the Patna High Court in D.B. Letters Patent Appeal No.312/2022 decided on 03.07.2024 24 (2025) 1 SCC 729 25 2026 INSC 68 26 (2024) 19 SCC 506 (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (74 of 84) [SAW-256/2023]
n) Chandrakala Trivedi vs State of Rajasthan And Others27
o) Ashok Kumar And Another vs State of Bihar And Others28
p) Union of India And Others vs S. Vinodh Kumar And Others29
q) Prakash Chand Meena And Others vs State of Rajasthan And Others30
r) Reshamlal Pradhan vs State of Chhatisgarh And Another31
s) Marripati Nagaraja And Others vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh And Others32
t) Ajith K And Others vs Aneesh K.S. And Others (supra) u) Robin Kumar & Another vs State of H.P. and Others 33
v) Deepak Singh And Others vs State of U.P. And Others 34 w) Abhishek Sharma And Others vs State of UP And Others35
x) Surekha Rana vs Rajasthan Subordinate & Ministerial Service Selection Board And Another36 y) Milind Shantilal Rathod And Others (supra) z) Devesh Sharma vs Union of India And Others37 27 (2012) 3 SCC 129 28 (2017) 4 SCC 357 29 (2007) 8 SCC 100 30 (2015) 8 SCC 484 31 Judgment passed by the High Court of Chattisgarh in Writ Petition (S) No.3169/2015 on 08.12.2015 32 (2007) 11 SCC 522 33 Judgment passed by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh in CWP No.138/2020 and other connected matters decided on 14.08.2020 34 Judgment passed by the Allahabad High Court in Writ A No.24273/2018 decided on 23.07.2019 35 Judgment passed by the Allahabad High Court in Writ A No.10266/2018 decided on 27.04.2022 36 Judgment passed by the Rajasthan High Court in D.B Special Appeal (Writ) No.219/2020 decided on 09.02.2021 37 (2023) 18 SCC 339 (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (75 of 84) [SAW-256/2023]
16. Learned counsel for the respondents-writ petitioners Mr. M.F. Baig has submitted that during the pendency of the writ petition, the learned Single Judge passed an order relying on Rule 36 of the Rules of 1963 and referred the matter to the DOP seeking their opinion as to whether persons having higher educational qualification, i.e., Degree in Mechanical Engineering are eligible to apply for the post of Motor Vehicle Sub-Inspector under the Rules of 1963. In compliance of the order dated 03.08.2022, the DOP gave its opinion to the RSSB vide their communication dated 30.08.2022 with regard to the persons having Degree of Mechanical Engineering and Automobile Engineering to be eligible and the learned counsel for the writ petitioner submitted that such an opinion given by the DOP could not be taken into consideration as the correct opinion and a circular had been issued by the State Government on 18.10.2021 to the effect that in case of any dispute regarding educational qualification, it would be the Committee which would decide the matter, whereas, only the Joint Secretary had given their opinion. The learned Single Judge, therefore, directed to place the matter before the Equivalence Committee constituted in pursuance of circular dated 18.10.2021.
17. Learned counsel has further submitted that the Experts/ Equivalence Committee gave its opinion on 14.10.2022, stating that it was neither rational nor justified to exclude the candidates holding a higher qualification than the diploma holders in the same discipline as ineligible (holding the qualification of degree in the subject of Mechanical Engineering and Automobile Engineering to be a higher qualification). The DOP also directed that such (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:32 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (76 of 84) [SAW-256/2023] candidate possessing the qualification shall be treated to be higher qualification and candidates possessing such qualification would be eligible to participate. He further pointed out that subsequently, even an amendment has been made and now candidates having higher qualification are also treated as eligible under the Rules.
18. It was also further pointed out that even in the previous recruitment examination of Motor Vehicle Sub Inspector, directions were issued allowing the candidates, who possess higher educational qualification than the prescribed educational qualifications, to be treated as eligible and therefore, there was no reason to depart from the settled principles.
19. Learned counsel Mr. M.F. Baig, therefore, supports the judgment passed by the learned Single Judge and reiterates his submissions made before the learned Single Judge in support of the prayer made of excluding the degree holders.
20. Learned counsel Mr. M.F. Baig also adopts the arguments as raised by learned Senior Counsel Mr. Ajeet Kumar Sharma.
21. Learned counsel Mr. Sunil Samdaria has also supported the judgment passed by the learned Single Judge.
22. The other counsels have also supported the judgment passed by the learned Single Judge and pointed out that even the report of the Expert Committee whereby the directions were issued, did not hold the qualification of degree in Automobile Engineering and Mechanical Engineering to be equivalent to diploma and merely directed that since it was a higher qualification, the same can be considered.
(Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:33 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (77 of 84) [SAW-256/2023]
23. We have considered the submissions and carefully gone through the judgment passed by the learned Single Judge and also the judgments which have been cited at Bar.
24. Before we examine the merits of the case, it would be apposite to discuss in short the import of the judgments cited at Bar by both the learned counsels for the parties.
25. In the case of Jyoti K.K. (supra), the appellants-therein were holders of B. Tech degree in Electrical Engineering, who were held to be ineligible for selection on the post of Sub-Engineers (Electrical) which provided the technical qualification of Diploma in Electrical Engineering of a recognized Institution after 3 years' course of study or a certificate in Electrical Engineering from any one of the recognized Technical Schools. The contention was that since they possess higher qualification, therefore, their non-
consideration was not correct.
The Supreme Court further noticed that the rules governing the appointment also provided under Rule 10(a)(ii), a non-
obstante clause which states that "notwithstanding anything contained in the rules such of those higher qualifications which presuppose the acquisition of the lower qualification prescribed for the post shall also be sufficient for the post."
The Supreme Court also noticed that for the promotional post of Assistant Engineer, a degree in Electrical Engineering has been prescribed and therefore, it proceeded to hold that for a higher post as the qualification of degree is provided, it would be pre-supposing that the acquisition of lower qualification of diploma in that subject prescribed for the post should be sufficient.
(Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:33 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (78 of 84) [SAW-256/2023]
26. In the case of Zahoor Ahmad Rather (supra), the post of Technician Grade-III was in question and qualification prescribed was Matriculation with the ITI in Electrical Grade. The appellants-
therein were diploma holders in Electrical Engineering/ Electronics and Communication but did not possess ITI certification. The Apex Court held as under:-
"26. We are in respectful agreement with the interpretation which has been placed on the judgment in Jyoti K.K. in the subsequent decision in Anita. The decision in Jyoti K.K. turned on the provisions of Rule 10(a)(ii). Absent such a rule, it would not be permissible to draw an inference that a higher qualification necessarily presupposes the acquisition of another, albeit lower, qualification. The prescription of qualifications for a post is a matter of recruitment policy. The State as the employer is entitled to prescribe the qualifications as a condition of eligibility. It is no part of the role or function of judicial review to expand upon the ambit of the prescribed qualifications. Similarly, equivalence of a qualification is not a matter which can be determined in exercise of the power of judicial review. Whether a particular qualification should or should not be regarded as equivalent is a matter for the State, as the recruiting authority, to determine. The decision in Jyoti K.K. turned on a specific statutory rule under which the holding of a higher qualification could presuppose the acquisition of a lower qualification. The absence of such a rule in the present case makes a crucial difference to the ultimate outcome. In this view of the matter, the Division Bench of the High Court was justified in reversing the judgment of the learned Single Judge and in coming to the conclusion that the appellants did not meet the prescribed qualifications. We find no error in the decision of the Division Bench.
27. While prescribing the qualifications for a post, the State, as employer, may legitimately bear in mind several features including the nature of the job, the aptitudes requisite for the efficient discharge of duties, the functionality of a qualification and the content (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:33 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (79 of 84) [SAW-256/2023] of the course of studies which leads up to the acquisition of a qualification. The State is entrusted with the authority to assess the needs of its public services. Exigencies of administration, it is trite law, fall within the domain of administrative decision-making. The State as a public employer may well take into account social perspectives that require the creation of job opportunities across the societal structure. All these are essentially matters of policy. Judicial review must tread warily. That is why the decision in Jyoti K.K. must be understood in the context of a specific statutory rule under which the holding of a higher qualification which presupposes the acquisition of a lower qualification was considered to be sufficient for the post. It was in the context of specific rule that the decision in Jyoti K.K. turned."
27. We notice that the case of Jyoti K.K. (supra) was also distinguished by the Apex Court in the case of Anita (supra). In that case [Anita (supra)], the qualification for J.B.T. Teacher required a Matric with two years course in J.B.T. Training with knowledge of Punjabi and Hindi language at matriculation standard or its equivalent. The respondents-therein had held qualification of M.A/ M.Sc. and aiming it to be a higher qualification, sought participation and eligibility for the post of J.B.T. Teacher. However, the Hon'ble Supreme Court disallowed such participation and distinguished Jyoti K.K. (supra), noticing the existence of Rule 10(a)(ii) in the Kerala State and Subordinate Services Rules, 1956, which was absent in Anita's Case (supra).
It would be apposite to quote the relevant para 15 of the judgment passed in the case of Anita (supra) as under:-
"15. It was sought to be asserted on the basis of the aforesaid observations, that since the private respondents possess higher qualifications, then the qualification of JBT/ETT, (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:33 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (80 of 84) [SAW-256/2023] they should be treated as having fulfilled the qualification stipulated for the posts of JBT/ETT Teachers. It is not possible for us to accept the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the private respondents, because the statutory rules which were taken into consideration by this Court while recording the aforesaid observations in Jyoti K.K. case, permitted the aforesaid course. The statutory rule, in the decision relied on by the learned counsel for the private respondents, is extracted hereunder:
(SCC p.598, para 6) "6. Rule 10(a)(ii) reads as follows:
'10.(a)(ii) Notwithstanding anything contained in these Rules or in the Special Rules, the qualifications recognised by executive orders or Standing Orders of Government as equivalent to a qualification specified for a post in the Special Rules and *such of those higher qualifications which presuppose the acquisition of the lower qualification prescribed for the post shall also be sufficient for the post*.' " (emphasis supplied) A perusal of the Rule clearly reveals that the possession of higher qualification would presuppose the acquisition of the lower qualification prescribed for the posts. Insofar as the present controversy is concerned, there is no similar statutory provision authorising the appointment of persons with higher qualifications."
28. A recent judgment in the case of Puneet Sharma (supra), the Apex Court was considering the qualification required for appointment and the question as to whether a degree in Electrical Engineering/Electrical and Electronics Engineering is technically a higher qualification than a diploma in that discipline and whether degree holders are eligible for appointment to the post of Junior Engineer (Electrical). In the said case, a rule which was mentioned in the Schedule as "Minimum educational and other qualifications required to direct recruits" and it was stated that the essential (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:33 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (81 of 84) [SAW-256/2023] qualification is minimum matriculation with diploma in Electrical/ Electronics and Communication/ Computer Sciences. Considering the word 'minimum' the Court proceeded to hold that a higher qualification would also be sufficient. By reading the Rule as a whole, it proceeded to held as under:-
"33. This Court is conscious that the issue in question is whether the minimum qualification of a diploma in electrical or electronic engineering or other prescribed qualifications includes a degree in that discipline. However, the rules have to be considered as a whole. So viewed, the two sub- quotas are:
(1) 5% enabling those diploma-holders who acquire degree qualifications during service as Junior Engineers; and (2) 5% enabling among those who hold degrees before joining as Junior Engineers.
34. The latter (2) conclusively establishes that what the rule-making authority undoubtedly had in mind was that degree-holders too could compete for the position of JEs as individuals holding equivalent or higher qualifications. If such interpretation were not given, there would be no meaning in the 5% sub-quota set apart for those who were degree-holders before joining as Junior Engineers -- in terms of the recruitment rules as existing.
35. The court's opinion is fortified by the latest amendment brought about on 3-6-2020. This clarifies beyond doubt that even for the post of Junior Engineers, those individuals holding higher qualifications are eligible to compete. In the opinion of this Court, though the amending rules were brought into force prospectively, nevertheless, being clarificatory, they apply to the recruitment that is the subject-matter of the present controversy. Such a position (i.e. clarificatory amendments operative retroactively, despite their enforcement prospectively) has been held in several previous judgments of this Court. In Zile Singh v. State of Haryana this Court examined the various authorities on statutory interpretation and concluded:(SCC pp. 8-9, paras 13-14) "13. It is a cardinal principle of construction that every statute is prima facie (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:33 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (82 of 84) [SAW-256/2023] prospective unless it is expressly or by necessary implication made to have a retrospective operation. But the rule in general is applicable where the object of the statute is to affect vested rights or to impose new burdens or to impair existing obligations. Unless there are words in the statute sufficient to show the intention of the legislature to affect existing rights, it is deemed to be prospective only--'nova constitutio futuris formam imponere debet non praeteritis'--a new law ought to regulate what is to follow, not the past. (See Principles of Statutory Interpretation by Justice G.P. Singh, 9th Edn., 2004 at p.
438.) It is not necessary that an express provision be made to make a statute retrospective and the presumption against retrospectivity may be rebutted by necessary implication especially in a case where the new law is made to cure an acknowledged evil for the benefit of the community as a whole (ibid., p. 440).
14. The presumption against retrospective operation is not applicable to declaratory statutes.... In determining, therefore, the nature of the Act, regard must be had to the substance rather than to the form. If a new Act is "to explain" an earlier Act, it would be without object unless construed retrospectively. An explanatory Act is generally passed to supply an obvious omission or to clear up doubts as to the meaning of the previous Act. It is well- settled that if a statute is curative or merely declaratory of the previous law retrospective operation is generally intended.... An amending Act may be purely declaratory to clear a meaning of a provision of the principal Act which was already implicit. A clarificatory amendment of this nature will have retrospective effect (ibid., pp. 468-69).""
29. It is settled law that the State as an employer is entitled to prescribe the qualification required to be held by any person for appointment on any post. The said qualification would be (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:33 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (83 of 84) [SAW-256/2023] incorporated in the rules framed under the proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution of India.
30. Having considered the aforesaid and detailed discussions in the judgment passed by the learned Single Judge, we find that the schedule as noticed above reflects a completely different picture.
For the post of Motor Vehicle Sub-Inspector, there is no word 'minimum qualification' mentioned, as specific qualification of Diploma in Automobile Engineering or a Diploma in Mechanical Engineering has been stated. Any qualification in either of the above disciplines declared equivalent by the Central Government or the State Government has also been treated as eligible. Thus, consciously the Rule making authority did not add the words 'higher qualification' nor it added 'degree holders' for the post.
31. The Equivalence Committee also consciously did not equate diploma with degree. Thus, what the appellants want this Court to do, is to add a qualification in the Schedule, which is absent. It is a settled principle of law that the rules have to be given the meaning for which they have been framed. So far as the higher qualification part is concerned, while we agree that the degree in the Automobile Engineering may be a higher qualification, but if the post is meant for those who are doing diploma, essentially what we find is that the legislature intended to give a source of employment to those who have done diploma alone and not to those who have done degree in a subject. As held in Zahoor Ahmad Rather's Case (supra), we would refrain from adding something more than what the Rule making Authority intended nor we can expand the canvass of qualification.
(Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:33 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:19821-DB] (84 of 84) [SAW-256/2023]
32. While exercising the writ jurisdiction, the judgment passed by the learned Single Judge, therefore, does not warrant any interference.
33. Although, the State Government may have later on amended the rule, the same would be made effective from the date of coming into force of the amendment and does not apply to an advertisement which has already been issued. It is settled law that the rules of game cannot be allowed to be changed after the game has already started. Reference in this regard is made to the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Tej Prakash Pathak And Others vs Rajasthan High Court And Others38.
34. In view of the above discussion, the appeals are dismissed.
35. The interim order stands vacated. The respondent-State shall now proceed with the selection and the same shall be concluded forthwith.
36. All pending applications stand disposed of accordingly.
37. A copy of this judgment be placed in each connected matter.
(BIPIN GUPTA),J (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA), ACTING CJ Himanshu Soni/Gaurav Kumar/reserve 38 (2013) 4 SCC 540 (Uploaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:01:25 AM) (Downloaded on 25/05/2026 at 11:29:33 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)