Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 4]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Deepak Kumar vs District & Sessions Judge, Delhi . on 16 April, 2014

dITEM NO.80                        REGISTRAR COURT.1                  SECTION XIV

               S U P R E M E         C O U R T   O F    I N D I A
                                  RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

                          BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEED

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).19731/2013

DEEPAK KUMAR                                                    Petitioner(s)

                     VERSUS

DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, DELHI & ORS.            Respondent(s)
(With prayer for interim relief and office report)
WITH SLP(C) NO. 23806 of 2013
(With office report)
Civil Appeal NO. 6305-6306 of 2013
(With office report)

Date: 16/04/2014        This Petition was called on for hearing today.

For Petitioner(s)
                           Dr.    vijendra Mahndiyan, Adv.
                           Ms.    Pallavi Awasthi, Adv.
                           Mr.    Deepak Goel,Adv.
                           Mrs    Lalita Kaushik, Adv.


For Respondent(s)
                           Mr.    Shiv Kumar Tripathi, Adv.
                           Mr.    D.S. Mahra,Adv.
                           Mr.    P. Parmeswaran, Adv.
                           Mr.    Praveen Swarup, Adv.

               UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following
                                   O R D E R
SLP(C) No.19731/2013

Counter affidavit on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2 has already come on record.

On behalf of respondent No.3, the learned Advocate, Mr. Shiv Kumar Tripathi has made a submission at Bar that no counter affidavit is required to be filed on record. Item No.80 -2-

The learned counsel for the petitioner to file the appropriate application for permission to file rejoinder affidavit on record within three weeks and on compliance, the same be processed as per rules. SLP(C) NO. 23806 of 2013 All the three respondents have failed to file counter affidavit, despite final chance granted on the last date.

Further necessary orders to be passed as and when the other connected matters would become ready. Civil Appeal NO. 6305-6306 of 2013 Office report not received.

List again on 25.7.2014.

(M.A. SAYEED) REGISTRAR rd