Gauhati High Court
Ghanashyam Mahanta vs The State Of Assam And 10 Ors on 14 July, 2025
Author: Sanjay Kumar Medhi
Bench: Sanjay Kumar Medhi
Page No.# 1/4
GAHC010142932025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : WP(C)/3807/2025
GHANASHYAM MAHANTA
S/O LATE ANANTA RAM MAHANTA, MANAGING PARTNER OF M/S
MASCOT REAL ESTATE, A REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM HAVING ITS
REGISTERED OFFICE AT M.C. ROAD, GUWAHATI-3, DIST- KAMRUP (M),
ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 10 ORS.
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE
GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-
6
2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
DIST- KAMRUP (M)
GUWAHATI
ASSAM
PIN-781036
3:THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY FOR LAND ACQUISITION (CAL)
DIST- KAMRUP (M)
ASSAM
PIN-781036
4:THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COMMISSIONER
KAMRUP (M)
GUWAHATI
ASSAM
PIN-781036
5:MANABENDRA KUMAR DAS
S/O LATE BIRENDRA KUMAR DAS
Page No.# 2/4
R/O KALAPAHAR
GUWAHATI
P.S.- FATASHIL AMBARI
GUWAHATI
DIST- KAMRUP (M)
ASSAM
6:DILIP KUMAR DAS
S/O LATE BIRENDRA KUMAR DAS
R/O KALAPAHAR
GUWAHATI
P.S.- FATASHIL AMBARI
GUWAHATI
DIST- KAMRUP (M)
ASSAM
7:GAURANGA ADHIKARI
S/O NAGENDRA CHANDRA ADHIKARI
R/O KALAPAHAR
GUWAHATI
P.S.- FATASHIL AMBARI
GUWAHATI
DIST- KAMRUP (M)
ASSAM
8:BISHNU PADA ADHIKAR
S/O NAGENDRA CHANDRA ADHIKARI
R/O KALAPAHAR
GUWAHATI
P.S.- FATASHIL AMBARI
GUWAHATI
DIST- KAMRUP (M)
ASSAM
9:KHUSHI ADHIKARI
W/O LATE PARTHA ADHIKARI
R/O KALAPAHAR
GUWAHATI
P.S.- FATASHIL AMBARI
GUWAHATI
DIST- KAMRUP (M)
ASSAM
10:SUBRATA ADHIKARI
S/O NAGENDRA CHANDRA ADHIKARI
R/O KALAPAHAR
GUWAHATI
P.S.- FATASHIL AMBARI
Page No.# 3/4
GUWAHATI
DIST- KAMRUP (M)
ASSAM
11:BABLA ADHIKARI
S/O NAGENDRA CHANDRA ADHIKARI
R/O KALAPAHAR
GUWAHATI
P.S.- FATASHIL AMBARI
GUWAHATI
DIST- KAMRUP (M)
ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR B P BORAH, MR J. B. CHOUDHURY,MR H MAZUMDER
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, REVENUE, GA, ASSAM
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
ORDER
14.07.2025 Heard Shri B.P. Borah, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Shri N. Das, learned State Counsel and Ms. P.R. Mahanta, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue Department.
The matter pertains to a grievance of inadequate compensation pertaining to acquisition of land. The petitioner has contended that a commercial building has been constructed and the assessment made is wholly inadequate. Though the petitioner has made a representation to the CALA, it appears that the remedy may be provided under Section 64 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.
At this stage, Shri Bora, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for some time to obtain instructions.
Page No.# 4/4 List on 16.07.2025.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant