Bombay High Court
Maha. Agrotech (India) Thr. Prop. ... vs State Of Maharashtra Thr. Police ... on 12 January, 2021
Author: Amit B. Borkar
Bench: Z. A. Haq, Amit B. Borkar
1 cr-apl-883-17&10-18j.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO. 883 OF 2017
WITH
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO. 10 OF 2018
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO. 883 OF 2017
1. Shri Santosh S/o. Ganpatrao Netam,
Age about 33 years, Occ. Service,
R/o. Ward No. 39, Gandhi Nagar,
Rajnandgaon, Tah. & Dist. Rajnandgaon,
(Chhattisgarh).
2. Shri Shubham S/o. Vikasji Manusmare,
Aged about 21 years, Occ. Service,
R/o. Ward No. 2, Koparna,
Tah. Koparna, Dist. Chandrapur. . . . APPLICANTS
...V E R S U S..
1. State of Maharashtra through
Police Station Officer,
Warora, Dist. Chandrapur.
2. Shri Madhukar S/o. Govindrao Sontakke,
Aged about 52 years, Occ. Service,
Office Address- District Quality Control
Inspector, Agriculture Office,
Chandrapur. . . . NON-APPLICANTS
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shri Rohit P. Masurkar, Advocate for applicants.
Shri T. A. Mirza, A.P.P. for non-applicant no. 1/State.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WITH
::: Uploaded on - 15/01/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 07/02/2021 12:53:08 :::
2 cr-apl-883-17&10-18j.odt
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO. 10 OF 2018
Maha. Agrotech (India) through its
Proprietor Sharad S/o. Nandkishore Mishra,
Age about 41 years, Occ. Business,
Office at Jagnaade Chowk, Main Road,
Tah. Amgaon, Dist. Gondia. . . . APPLICANT
...V E R S U S..
1. State of Maharashtra through
Police Station Officer, Warora,
Dist. Chandrapur.
2. Shri Madhukar S/o. Govindrao Sontakke,
Aged about 52 years, Occ. Service,
Office Address- District Quality Control
Inspector, Agriculture Office,
Chandrapur . . . NON-APPLICANTS
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shri Y. R. Kinkhede, Advocate a/w. Shri Rohit P. Masurkar, Advocate
for applicant.
Shri T. A. Mirza, A.P.P. for non-applicant no. 1/State.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM :- Z. A. HAQ AND
AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ.
DATED :- 12.01.2021
JUDGMENT (PER : AMIT B. BORKAR, J.) :-
1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of learned Advocate for the parties.
2. Since, both these applications challenge the same First Information Report (FIR), the applications are decided by common judgment.
::: Uploaded on - 15/01/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 07/02/2021 12:53:08 :::
3 cr-apl-883-17&10-18j.odt
3. The applicant/s by way present applications is/are challenging the FIR bearing no. 515/2017, dated 10.05.2017 registered by the non-applicant no. 1-Police Station for the offence punishable under Section 12, 13(I)(a), 7, 4, 5 and 35 of the Fertilizer Control Order, 1955 and under Section 7(I)(a)(II) of the Essential Commodities Act, 1957.
4. The FIR came to be registered against the applicant/s at the instance of the non-applicant no. 2, with accusation that the applicant/s supplied sub-standard seeds to the farmers by representing it as best quality. It is alleged that manufacturing company and their sales representatives without permission have manufactured and distributed and sold fertilizers and also sold sub-standard seeds, without issuing bills and without maintaining Sale Register and other required documents for cheating farmers and have committed offence alleged in the FIR.
5. The applicant/s therefore, challenged the FIR by filing the present applications. This Court issued notices to the non-applicants. This Court on 14.08.2008 granted stay to the further proceedings in Crime No. 515/2017.
::: Uploaded on - 15/01/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 07/02/2021 12:53:08 :::
4 cr-apl-883-17&10-18j.odt
6. The non-applicant no. 1 filed its reply and pointed out that the applicant/s have cheated villagers by supplying sub-standard fertilizers. It is also stated that laboratory report shows that the fertilizers sold by the applicant/s contain ingredients, which are banned in the State of Maharashtra. On 28.08.2018, the non-applicant no. 2 filed reply and pointed out that though there was interim relief granted on 29.01.1998 by this Court and continued on 29.06.2018, the Investigating Officer inadvertently filed charge-sheet on 13.08.2018. It is further submitted that the said Investigation Officer therefore, tenders unconditional apology. It is therefore submitted that proceeding initiated may kindly be dropped.
7. We have carefully considered the contents of the FIR and replies filed by the non-applicant no. 1. The prosecution has not pointed out any Order or Circular or Government Resolution or Notification to show that the above mentioned product is fertilizer within the meaning of the Fertilizer Control Order or it comes under any other Control Order, which is issued under Section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act. It is brought to our notice that Government Resolution dated 16.08.2010 issued under the Fertilizer Control Order, 1985 regarding constitution of committee for quality control has been cancelled by the Government Resolution dated 03.10.2017.
::: Uploaded on - 15/01/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 07/02/2021 12:53:08 :::
5 cr-apl-883-17&10-18j.odt
8. The prosecution is not able to bring on record any order or notification to show that fertilizer, which is subject matter of the FIR, has been mentioned as a banned product in the Fertilizer Control Order, 1985 or any other order issued under Section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act. Therefore, ingredients of offence punishable under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act are not made out. Continuation of proceeding against the applicant/s would amount to abuse of process of Court. We, therefore, pass the following order:
First Information Report bearing Crime No. 515/2017, dated 10.05.2017 against the applicant/s by the non-applicant no. 1- Police Station for the offence punishable under Section 12, 13(I)(a), 7, 4, 5 and 35 of the Fertilizers Control Order, 1955 and under Section 7(I)(a)(II) of Essential Commodities Act, 1957 against the applicant/s are quashed and set aside.
Both the Criminal Applications are allowed in the above terms. Rule is made absolute accordingly.
JUDGE JUDGE
RR Jaiswal
::: Uploaded on - 15/01/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 07/02/2021 12:53:08 :::