Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Sant Lal @ Santoo vs The State Of Chhattisgarh on 25 September, 2023

Author: Sanjay Karol

Bench: Sanjay Karol

                                                                1

     ITEM NO.1712                                      COURT NO.9                       SECTION II-C

                                      S U P R E M E C O U R T O F                I N D I A
                                              RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) Diary No(s). 35472/2023

     SANT LAL @ SANTOO & ANR.                                                          Petitioner(s)

                                                               VERSUS

     THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH                                                         Respondent(s)

     (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.187468/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and
     IA No.187467/2023-EXEMPTION FROM SURRENDERING WITHIN TIME )

     Date : 25-09-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :                    HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KAROL
                                                  [IN CHAMBER]

     For Petitioner(s)                       Mr. Kaustubh Shukla, AOR
                                             Mr. Mainak Sarkar, Adv.
                                             Ms. Manika Jolly, Adv.

     For Respondent(s)


                               UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                    O R D E R

1. The petitioners stand convicted for having committed an offence punishable under Sections 363,366 & 306 of IPC and sentenced him to undergo five years rigorous imprisonment.

2. It is stated across the bar that both during trial and pendency of appeal by the High Court, the petitioner was on bail. It stands clarified that initially with the registration of the FIR, the petitioner was arrested and suffered incarceration for a period of five months, thereafter, he was released on bail. Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by GEETA AHUJA Date: 2023.09.27

3. 18:03:13 IST Reason: It was further argued that the findings returned by the Courts below need to be interfered with in view of erroneous appreciation of the evidence laid by the prosecution which has resulted into 2 miscarriage of justice.

4. Application for exemption from surrendering is allowed.




(VARSHA MENDIRATTA)                           (RENU BALA GAMBHIR)
COURT MASTER (SH)                              COURT MASTER (NSH)