Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 8, Cited by 0]

Patna High Court - Orders

Madan Prasad & Ors vs The State Of Bihar on 15 September, 2016

Author: Anjana Mishra

Bench: Anjana Mishra

                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 Criminal Miscellaneous No.30624 of 2016
                              Arising Out of PS.Case No. -142 Year- 2015 Thana -PIPRAKOTHI
                                        District- EAST CHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI)
                 ======================================================
                 1. Madan Prasad, son of Late Mahendra Prasad.
                 2. Sobha Devi @ Shobha Devi, wife of Madan Prasad
                 3. Ashok Prasad @ Ashok Kumar, son of Madan Prasad,
                    All Residents of Village- Dhekahan, Kaswa Tola,
                    Police Station- Pipra Kothi, District- East Champaran
                                                                         .... .... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                    .... .... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s        :    Mr. Dhurendra Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s    :    Mr. Jitendra Kumar Roy-1, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA
                 ORAL ORDER

2   15-09-2016

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Pipra Kothi P.S. Case No.142 of 2015 for allegedly having committed the offences under Sections 341, 452, 323, 379, 354, 307, 504 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Daain Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present petitioners are the close family members of the informant and the dispute arose out of the cutting of Seasam tree in their ancestral land, which was disputed by the present petitioners. It is submitted that in connection with the said Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30624 of 2016 (2) dt.15-09-2016 2/2 occurrence, a case was also filed by the present petitioners.

Considering the nature of allegations made against the petitioners and that these petitioners have got no criminal antecedents, let all the three petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari, in connection with Pipra Kothi P.S. Case No.142 of 2015, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.




                                                (Anjana Mishra, J)
    PNM

U      T