Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 4]

Allahabad High Court

Milap Chandra Jain And Others vs Satae Of U.P. And Others on 22 June, 2010

Author: Ran Vijai Singh

Bench: Ran Vijai Singh

Court No. - 32

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 36281 of 2010

Petitioner :- Milap Chandra Jain And Others
Respondent :- Satae Of U.P. And Others
Petitioner Counsel :- L.K. Pandey
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.

Hon'ble Ran Vijai Singh,J.

While assailing the impugned transfer orders dated 16.3.2010, 29/30.3.2010 and 6.5.2010 passed by respondent Nos.3 & 2, learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the aforesaid transfer orders have been passed without there being prior approval of the Police Establishment Board. In the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioners these transfer orders are in teeth of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Prakash Singh & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors., reported in (2006) 8 SCC 1. This fact could not be disputed at this stage by the learned Standing Counsel. In view of that learned Standing Counsel, who has accepted notices on behalf of the respondents is directed to file counter affidavit within four weeks. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed by the petitioners within two weeks thereafter.

As an interim measure, without prejudice to the right and contention of the parties, it is provided that if the petitioners have not joined pursuant to the impugned orders, they will not be insisted to join at their transferred place till the next date of listing.

Order Date :- 22.6.2010 Mustaqeem.